A Question about Palestinian Statehood

(This is only indirectly related to metaphysical naturalism and theism, so please forgive me if this seems too off-topic for you.)

In light of the recent decision about the UN’s decision to recognize Palestine as a Non-Member Observer State and the opposition to that status by the U.S., Israel, and others, I have a simple question.

If North Korea gets to be recognized as a full member of the UN, then what objective basis is there for excluding Palestine? Most of the international community opposes the policies and actions of North Korea, but I’m not aware of anyone suggesting that North Korea should be stripped of its UN membership. Why should Palestine be treated differently?

"In the case of about-ness, normativity, first-person perspective, and purpose, the content of the physical ..."

Can Brains Think?
"Yair,What criteria would you use to determine what a brain is feeling?"

Can Brains Think?
"I certainly agree that physicalism threatens the ontological existence of the person. However, I think ..."

Can Brains Think?
"I concede that physics cannot add up to create aboutness, objective normativity, or objective purpose. ..."

Can Brains Think?
POPULAR AT PATHEOS Nonreligious
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment