Empty Defense of an Empty Tomb: A Reply to Anne A. Kim’s Misunderstandings

I finished this essay many years ago, but due to my hiatus never got around to publishing it until now. It will be announced on the Secular Web’s What’s New?” page very soon. It can be accessed immediately by using the link below, however.
Abstract: William Lane Craig has argued for the historicity of Jesus’ empty tomb on the basis of ten lines of evidence. In response, Jeffery Jay Lowder argued that Craig had not yet shown that any of his ten items of evidence make the empty tomb more probable than not. Anne A. Kim has attempted to defend some of Craig’s arguments against Lowder’s objections, but as Lowder shows in this response to Kim, Kim has repeatedly misunderstood his points and attacked caricatures of his arguments rather than his actual arguments.
LINK

"Just FYI, all the discussions on this page will close soon. My email address is ..."

Tim Crane on Religious Violence
"They claim evil is an absence of good, and thus God cannot have it. Of ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."
""Thoughts and Prayers" are going out to everyone reading this obvious tautological nightmare!!!"

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."
"Luke, at this point, I am going to express some frustration. My basic point in ..."

Tolerating the Intolerant: The Central Paradox ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment