Ex-Apologist on Craig’s “Holy Spirit Epistemology”

This isn’t brand new; I just saw it mentioned on EA’s post listing his favorite posts of 2012 and I don’t remember seeing this before. EA criticizes Michael Martin’s objections to Craig’s Holy Spirit epistemology and then offers his own objection.

LINK

"Any idea how he justifies the underlying assumption of time being discrete?"

Feser’s Case for God – Part ..."
"Can you elaborate on what you mean by instantaneous causation? Imagine 2 moments: T1, which ..."

Feser’s Case for God – Part ..."
"If i were yo hazard a guess, perhaps he considers events to be discrete things? ..."

Feser’s Case for God – Part ..."
"Does he not also believe in instantaneous causation, meaning change occuring at the very next ..."

Feser’s Case for God – Part ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment