Ex-Apologist on Craig’s “Holy Spirit Epistemology”

This isn’t brand new; I just saw it mentioned on EA’s post listing his favorite posts of 2012 and I don’t remember seeing this before. EA criticizes Michael Martin’s objections to Craig’s Holy Spirit epistemology and then offers his own objection.

LINK

"Thomists usually allow for the possibility of an infinite chain of cause and effect stretching ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."
"It seems to me that the Argument from Contingency uses some misleading nomenclature, because "necessary" ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."
"Rather than ask clarification on words, you could just ask him to re-write his argument ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."
"I've noticed a simple problem with proposition 1c: "...if that thing depends on something else ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment