Bobier’s New Paper on the Kalam Argument: “God, Time, and the Kalam Cosmological Argument”

Christopher Alan Bobier, “God, Time, and the Kalam Cosmological Argument”Sophia (May 2013).
Here’s the abstract:

The Kalām cosmological argument deploys the following causal principle: whatever begins to exist has a cause. Yet, under what conditions does something ‘begin to exist’? What does it mean to say that ‘X begins to exist at t’? William Lane Craig has offered and defended various accounts that seek to establish the necessary and sufficient conditions for when something ‘begins to exist.’ I argue that all of the accounts that William Lane Craig has offered fail on the following grounds: either they entail that God has a cause or they render the Kalām argument unsound. Part of the problem is due to Craig’s view of God’s relationship to time: that God exists timelessly without creation and temporarily with creation. The conclusion is that Craig must abandon either the Kalām argument or his view of God’s relationship to time; he cannot consistently hold both.

HT: Ex-apologist

"Keith,Your OP was fairly long, and contained a variety of questions. Have I not ansered ..."

Can you know what it is ..."
"I have bought into the tentative, evidence based, hypothesis forming of Popper's empiricism. I start ..."

Can you know what it is ..."
"For the record, I would call myself a dualist who is not committed to any ..."

Can you know what it is ..."
"dcleve, thanks for responding. So it seems you are a bonafied Cartesian substance dualist! That's ..."

Can you know what it is ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment