Stupid Apologetics Tricks

Here are some stupid apologetics tricks I’ve come across lately in things I’ve been reading. Feel free to add your own in the combox. If I like it enough, I may just add yours to the list!

Stupid Apologetics Trick #1:

(1) Really crappy debaters used stupid arguments and objections against H.
(2) Therefore, H is true.

Stupid Apologetics Trick #2:

(1) H is true.
(2) Therefore, H is true.

Stupid Apologetics Trick #3:

Step 1. Literally ignore all of the evidence for X .
Step 2. Say there is no evidence for X.

Stupid Apologetics Trick #4:

(1)  H1 sucks as an explanation for X.
(2) Therefore, H2 is true.

Stupid Apologetics Trick #5:

(1) My opponent believes H1.
(2) Here are a bunch of objections to H2.
(3) Therefore, H3 is true.

Stupid Apologetics Trick #6:

(1) E1 is evidence for H1 and against H2.
(2) E2 is evidence for H1 and against H2.
(3) …
(n) En is evidence for H1 and against H2.
(n+1) Therefore, H1 is more probable than H2.

Stupid Apologetics Trick #7:

(1) If X and Y, then H1 is false.
(2) Authority A thinks that H1 is true and X is true.
(3) Authority B thinks that H1 is true and Y is true.
(4) Therefore, H1 is false.

Update (16 May 2014): Edited the conclusion of #1 and added #7.

 

"Keith,Since physical and logical laws are of a mechanical nature I am surprised we disagree ..."

The Laws of Physics and the ..."
"That won't work as a counterexample, because it is unclear whether evolution is greater than ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."
"Excellent points.Although the Butterfly effect does casts doubt on the claim that "the cause must ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."
"Parfit means that some truths, such as arithmetical truths, logical truths and normative truths, are ..."

Richard Dawkins and Moral Realism

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment