For Victor Reppert: The Metaethical Objections to Craig’s Moral Argument Which His Sophisticated Critics Use, But Craig Never Acknowledges in Debate Opening Statements

For Victor Reppert: The Metaethical Objections to Craig’s Moral Argument Which His Sophisticated Critics Use, But Craig Never Acknowledges in Debate Opening Statements February 23, 2016

(Redated post originally published on 21 June 2012)

This is a quick follow-up to my last reply to Victor Reppert. The title of Reppert’s post is, “The Moral Argument that Christians don’t use, but atheists always rebut.” In reply, we can point to “The Metaethical Objections to Craig’s Moral Argument Which His Sophisticated Critics Use, But Craig Never Acknowledges in Debate Opening Statements.”

LINK

"This was a very high level and interesting discussion.Matt says, in lecture you linked, that ..."

Matthew Flannagan and Jason Thibodeau Discuss ..."
"JJ: I'd like to know one thing I can study about any religion that isn't ..."

Skepticism about Religion – Part 3: ..."
"It is a bit mysterious how religious identity enhances congregational friendships to produce happiness, and ..."

Skepticism about Religion – Part 2: ..."
"sorry about that, It is a summary, I did not use the word "tiresome:" that ..."

Skepticism about Religion – Part 3: ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


TRENDING AT PATHEOS Nonreligious
What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment