Latest from Paul Draper: “Atheism and Agnosticism” for SEP

Here’s a topic which generates no disagreement at all: how to define the words “atheism” and “agnosticism.”

LINK

I am honored to have been listed in the acknowledgments.

ETA: Comments on this post will be heavily moderated. My goal in having a comments box on this post, as with all posts, is to have informative comments. I would hope that most of the comments are educational in the sense that I or other readers can learn from them, much as I would expect to learn from a letter to the editor of a publication like Scientific American or a journal.

"I think most humans DO embed themselves into traditions, and I consider the diversity of ..."

Tolerating the Intolerant: The Central Paradox ..."
"Thanks for your reply. My point is that there are other concepts of what "perfect ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."
"Taylor seems to presume that scientism, and valuelessness, are intrinsic aspects to a secular society. ..."

Tolerating the Intolerant: The Central Paradox ..."
"The errors there are the same which led you to conclude that radioactive decay is ..."

Kreeft’s Case for God – Part ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment