Latest from Paul Draper: “Atheism and Agnosticism” for SEP

Here’s a topic which generates no disagreement at all: how to define the words “atheism” and “agnosticism.”

LINK

I am honored to have been listed in the acknowledgments.

ETA: Comments on this post will be heavily moderated. My goal in having a comments box on this post, as with all posts, is to have informative comments. I would hope that most of the comments are educational in the sense that I or other readers can learn from them, much as I would expect to learn from a letter to the editor of a publication like Scientific American or a journal.

"I see your point. However, you are assuming a particular analysis of the term "actualization". ..."

Feser’s Case for God – Part ..."
"6. The occurrence of any change C presupposes some thing or substance S which changes....However, ..."

Feser’s Case for God – Part ..."
"So this is not circular?x changes if and only if x actualizes a potentialx actualizes ..."

Feser’s Case for God – Part ..."
"You are wrong. Feser works with a Thomistic vocabulary."

Feser’s Case for God – Part ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment