Link: “Slavery, Southern Conservatism, and Darwinian Natural Right” by Larry Arnhart

“Some of the opponents of Darwinian moral naturalism insist that morality requires a transcendent source in religious belief. But in this debate over slavery, we see that such religious belief–at least as coming from Biblical revelation–does not provide us reliable moral guidance. Cobb was able to show that the Bible–both the Old Testament and the New Testament–sanctioned slavery. (Recent books by Mark Noll and Eugene Genovese have surveyed the history of Southern proslavery arguments based on the Bible.) If the Bible cannot resolve such a moral debate, then we have to appeal to our natural moral experience that does not depend on religious belief. Darwinian science indicates how such moral experience might be founded in our evolved human nature.”

LINK

"I think you would find this site of interest: https://disqus.com/home/cha...Its author shares your concern over ..."

How Atheists get it Wrong, According ..."
"I was not aware that the US Constitution requires the federal government to ensure that ..."

Tolerating the Intolerant: The Central Paradox ..."
"Keith,I would like to object to an aspects of this OP:First, the Hare Krishnas were ..."

Tolerating the Intolerant: The Central Paradox ..."
"Karl Popper addressed most of these points in the Open Society and its Enemies. Democracies ..."

Tolerating the Intolerant: The Central Paradox ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment