LINK: Draper on Naturalism, Theism, and the Burden of Proof Ex-Apologist … [Read more...]

LINKS: Scientific American Summarizes the Cases For and Against the Multiverse

"The Case for Parallel Universes: Why the multiverse, crazy as it sounds, is a solid scientific idea" by Alexander Vilenkin and Max Tegmark (HT: Explicit Atheist)"Does the Multiverse Really Exist?" by George Ellis … [Read more...]

The Cases For and Against Christianity in 30 Minutes or Less

"The Case for Christianity in 15 Minutes or Less" by J.W. Wartick"The Case Against Christianity in 15 Minutes or Less" by A is for AtheistHT: Debunking Christianity … [Read more...]

Gervais and Norenzayan: Analytical Thinking Promotes Religious Disbelief

Abstract: Scientific interest in the cognitive underpinnings of religious belief has grown in recent years. However, to date, little experimental research has focused on the cognitive processes that may promote religious disbelief. The present studies apply a dual-process model of cognitive processing to this problem, testing the hypothesis that analytic processing promotes religious disbelief. Individual differences in the tendency to analytically override initially flawed intuitions in … [Read more...]

LINK: 3 Reasons Young Americans are Giving Up on God

According to The Week, young Americans are "giving up" on God for three reasons.1. Fundamentalists are turning off some young people2. Atheists and agnostic role models are getting more vocal3. Liberal attacks on religion are to blameHmmm... Assuming the statistical data reported by this article is accurate, I think the title is misleading. Yes, the percentage of people who "never doubt the existence of God" may have decreased, but it still is a supermajority.Also, I think this article missed a … [Read more...]

LINK: Steve Lovell Reviews Erik Wielenberg’s God and the Reach of Reason

LINK … [Read more...]

LINK: “But Theists Do It Too: An Objection To Plantinga’s EAAN” by Jimmy Licon

Abstract: In this paper, I present an objection to Plantinga’s evolutionary argument against naturalism called the theistic parity reply. Since traditional theism holds there is a great deal about the thoughts/intentions of God that is unknown to his creations, it could be that God desires that his subjects lack doxastic reliability for some good, unknown to them. If such a scenario cannot be blocked by the theist, then she must admit the probability her cognitive faculties are reliable is i … [Read more...]

LINK: Nate Shannon on Anderson and Welty’s Ambiguous Necessity

"In their argument for the existence of God from the laws of logic,* James Anderson and Greg Welty (AW) claim that the laws of logic exist necessarily. Their claim is that the laws of logic possess de re necessity, the type of necessity—metaphysical necessity—predicated of objects. How do they get there? They don’t, in my view, and their oversight is a smooth ambiguity between de re and de dicto necessity."LINK … [Read more...]