McDowell’s Trilemma – Part 2

McDowell's Trilemma Argument (hereafter: MTA), can be found in The New Evidence that Demands a Verdict (hereafter: NETDV) by Josh McDowell (see pages 158-163).=================...Jesus definitely claimed to be God (see below and in Chapter 6).  So every person must answer the question: Is His claim to deity true or false?   (NETDV, p.158)=================The first key premise of MTA is this:Jesus claimed to be God.This first premise appears to be false.  Jesus did NOT cla … [Read more...]

McDowell’s Trilemma – Part 1

Here are the basic premises of McDowell's Trilemma Argument (hereafter: MTA), from The New Evidence that Demands a Verdict (hereafter: NETDV by Josh McDowell:=================...Jesus definitely claimed to be God (see below and in Chapter 6).  So every person must answer the question: Is His claim to deity true or false?  This question deserves a most serious consideration.[...]Jesus' claim to be God must be either true or false.  If Jesus' claims are true, then He is the Lord, an … [Read more...]

Debate: External Evidence for Jesus – Parts 5B and 5C

Joe Hinman's fifth argument for the existence of Jesus based on external evidence is presented in two sections of his post on the Web of Historicity:5B. Big Web of Historicity5C. Jesus Myth Theory Cannot Account for the WebThe fifth argument for the existence of Jesus can be summarized in terms of a single premise:1.There is a web of historicity.Therefore:2. It is probable that Jesus of Nazareth was a flesh-and-blood historical person.Given this very simple summary, … [Read more...]

Debate: External Evidence for Jesus – Part 5A: Five Principles

Joe Hinman's fifth argument for the existence of Jesus is presented in three sections:5A. Historical Methods5B. Big Web of Historicity5C. Jesus Myth Theory Cannot Account for the WebI will comment on, and raise objections to, points in each of these three sections, but this post will only cover part of the section on "Historical Methods".  Specifically, I will cover the five high-level principles of historical investigation proposed by Hinman in his discussion of "Historical … [Read more...]

Has the Journal Philo Died?

I've heard privately from several philosophers that they submitted articles and heard nothing for months. It's been years since a new issue of the journal came out. If you go to the journal's new website, there is now a statement that "Philo is no longer accepting submissions."I have no inside information about what may or may not have happened behind the scenes, but I think it is very unprofessional to leave authors and subscribers in the dark like this for so long. If they are going to … [Read more...]

Debate: External Evidence for Jesus – Part 2

========================NOTE: This post is now complete, as of 11:25 pm pacific time on Saturday, July 2, 2016.========================The first sentence of Joe Hinman's argument from the external evidence of Papias makes a very dubious claim:Papias was the student of the Apostle John.By this, Hinman means that Papias had personal, face-to-face conversations with the Apostle John.This claim was explicitly rejected by Eusebius, the the first historian of … [Read more...]

What is Christianity? Part 16

In his book Naming the Elephant (hereafter: NTE), the Christian apologist James Sire raises various objections against his previous analysis of the concept of a “worldview” that he had presented in his earlier book The Universe Next Door (hereafter: TUND).I have reviewed three of Sire’s objections to his earlier cognitivist analysis of the concept of a “worldview” and argued that those objections were unsuccessful (see previous posts 10, 11, 12, and 13).In post 15, I argued that Sire's be … [Read more...]

Dunning-Kruger Effect in Action: How NOT to Defend a ‘Best’ Explanation

I'm not going to name names, but I recently read something that could have not said more loudly, "I have no clue about inductive logic, Bayes' Theorem, or inference to the best explanation. I definitely should NOT be defending my position publicly because I have no clue what I am talking about, but I'm going to keep doing that anyway because I am clueless--even about my own cluelessness!"The context was this. Person #1 said that X is the best explanation for the data, and so probably true. … [Read more...]


CLOSE | X

HIDE | X