Hinman’s ABEAN Argument – Part 1: “Eternal and Necessary”

Joe Hinman wants me to seriously consider two arguments for the conclusion that "God is real".  I'm going to focus on his ABEAN argument for a number of posts, before I examine his argument from religious experience.I have attempted to summarize Hinman's  first argument in a brief standard form argument:Hinman's ABEAN Argument 1. All natural phenomena are contingent and temporal. 2. IF all natural phenomena are contingent and temporal, THEN some aspect of being is eternal and n … [Read more...]

Is Christianity True? – Part 2: The Christian Worldview

The Four Basic Worldview QuestionsA religion is fundamentally a system of religious beliefs.  What makes a collection of religious beliefs a "system" is that they are built up around a set of core beliefs called a "worldview".  There are different ways of conceptualizing worldviews; I favor conceiving of worldviews as problem-solving schemas, on analogy with medical problem solving, involving four basic questions/concepts: 1. SYMPTOMS: What are the most important problems of human l … [Read more...]

Is Christianity True? – Part 1: What is Christianity?

I have been producing a series of podcasts on the question "Is Christianity true?".  So far, four podcasts have been published, and I'm currently working on podcast # 5:http://thinkingcriticallyabout.podbean.com/The first four podcasts are introductory in nature, but in podcast #5,  I will be shifting gears and will start working on an evaluation of Christianity.  The first four podcasts are introductory, because I was working on the questions "Why think critically about whether Ch … [Read more...]

How NOT to Argue for Agnosticism

I recently purchased a couple of introductory books on the philosophy of religion.  One of the books is by a contemporary analytic philosopher of religion, Richard M. Gale, titled: On The Philosophy Of Religion (Thompson Wadsworth, 2007).  The other is by a philosopher named Gary Cox, who is not a specialist in philosophy of religion: The God Confusion (Bloomsbury, 2013; hereafter: TGC)  Gary Cox is a British philosopher who appears to be primarily interested in Sartre and exi … [Read more...]

Hinman’s Two Ways – Part 1: Outline of Argument #1

Joe Hinman wants me to set aside Mr. Geisler's pathetic case for God, and to give serious consideration to his case for God, which includes at least two arguments:Argument 1: an Aspect of Being is Eternal And Necessary (ABEAN),andArgument 2: Religious Experience Meets Epistemic Criteria (REMEC).In this first post, I will only get started with Hinman's first argument, attempting to clarify the basic structure of that argument.Here is an excerpt from Hinman's initial post on t … [Read more...]

Geisler’s Five Ways – Part 18: The God of the Bible Exists?

After laying out his case for the existence of God in When Skeptics Ask (hereafter: WSA), Dr. Norman Geisler attempts to link the God that he thinks he has proven to exist with "the God of the Bible":Is this the God of the Bible? At the burning bush, God told Moses his name and said, "I AM WHO I AM" (Ex. 3:14).  This signifies that the central characteristic of the God of the Bible is existence.  His very nature is existence.  ...The Bible also calls God eternal (Col. 1:17; Heb. 1:2), un … [Read more...]

INDEX: Geisler’s Five Ways

Here is my multi-part critical examination of Dr. Norman Geisler's case for the existence of God in his book When Skeptics Ask (coauthored with Ronald Brooks):Geisler’s First Argument http://www.patheos.com/blogs/secularoutpost/2016/10/16/geislers-first-argument/Geisler’s Five Ways http://www.patheos.com/blogs/secularoutpost/2016/10/16/geislers-five-ways/Geisler’s Five Ways – Part 2: How Many Arguments for God? h … [Read more...]

Geisler’s Five Ways – Part 17: God Exists?

Because Dr. Norman Geisler is unclear and confused in his use of the word "God", he fails to properly conclude his case for the existence of God in his book When Skeptics Ask (hereafter: WSA).But this failure is easily fixed.  I will reconstruct the final inference of his case for God in this post.  First, here is a comment that indicates part of what Geisler thinks he has proven:We have said that God is all-powerful, all-knowing, all-good, infinite, uncreated, unchanging, eternal, and om … [Read more...]