I work in Delaware. Manufactured homes provide the majority of housing for low- and moderate-income households in lower Delaware. Below the canal (the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal that slices across the northernmost New Castle County) Delaware remains largely rural. In such areas, apartments and rental properties are scarce. I live in an apartment. If I lived in lower Delaware, I might well live in a trailer.
People who live in manufactured homes are in a vulnerable situation. They own their home, but not the land it sits on, for which they must pay rent. Just like apartment dwellers, they have leases and those leases can include rent increases when they are up for renewal. But here apartment dwellers are at an advantage — we are far more mobile, more able to move elsewhere if confronted with an unreasonable increase in rent.
That fact is at the center of an ongoing dispute in Delaware between the residents of seven manufactured home parks and their landlord, Manufactured Home Communities, Inc., whose latest rent increase is up to 70 percent.
The residents are over a barrel — they can't afford a 70-percent rent increase. They can't afford to move their homes elsewhere. Many of these residents are retired and on fixed incomes (see the photos accompanying earlier articles here and here).
Part of what's going on here is that rural areas aren't immune from the same kind of gentrification that displaces urban renters. The housing bubble causing beach-area prices to soar in lower Delaware is rippling further and further inland and MHC seems to want a piece of that action.
Hundreds of residents of six Delaware mobile home parks must decide whether to move or find some way to pay rent increases of up to 70 percent after losing a court battle to stop a mobile home park owner from renewing leases without rent increase caps.
In a case brought by the Attorney General's Office, the Supreme Court rejected arguments that Delaware law prevented renewals that did not abide by clauses limiting annual rent increases. Manufactured Home Communities Inc. now is free to institute sharp increases for lots in six parks in Sussex County. The decision could affect as many as 700 tenants.
The court's decision seems to me to be based on the flawed assumption that the relationship between landlord and tenant at a trailer park is the same as that between a landlord and tenant in an apartment building. This disregards the extreme difference in mobility. It seems to be assuming lots of market options on behalf of residents who have no such options. They cannot afford to stay. They cannot afford to move. The landlord (just think about that word) holds all the cards and has no reason not to milk the tenants dry.