L.B.: Dissipation

Left Behind, pp. 332-337

When last we saw Buck Williams, he was rushing off to the airport to meet Hattie Durham even though he doesn’t really even remember what she looks like. He remembers that she is “drop dead gorgeous,” but nothing more specific.

It’s hard to fault Buck for this fuzzy mental image, since that three-word cliche is nearly all we readers were told about what Hattie looks like. We’ve also been told she is “attractive” and “beautiful,” but beyond that nothing. It’s possible this tells us something about the authors’ idea of female beauty. Maybe they think all beautiful women look alike, or that “gorgeous” women are all interchangeable. Or maybe they think “hot or not” is all that matters when describing a woman. Then again, we don’t really know what Buck, Rayford, Bruce, Steve or Rosenzweig looks like either.

Here was the last thing we read in the Buck story line:

Buck was glad for the diversion of seeing Hattie Durham. His only question now was whether he would recognize her. They had met under most traumatic circumstances.

And here is the very first thing we read when this story line resumes:

Hattie had rushed up to Buck when he arrived at the club around 11. His anticipation of any possibilities dissipated when the first thing out of her mouth was, “So, am I gonna get to meet Nicolae Carpathia?”

So we still don’t know, and Buck still doesn’t care, what she looks like. And once Buck’s “anticipation of any possibilities dissipated,” he seems to lose all interest in her. I do love that phrase, though. It sounds like something from a pharmaceutical ad: “If anticipation of possibilities fails to dissipate within four hours, see your doctor.”

Once Buck’s anticipation shrivels, so too does his opinion of Hattie, and it suddenly occurs to him how strange it was of him to offer to introduce this flight attendant he barely knows to the president of Romania, with whom he is only slightly better acquainted (though I suppose collaborating on the coverup of two murders does give Buck and Nicolae a kind of intimate bond). He was eager to boast that he was chummy with the Sexiest Antichrist Alive when he thought this might lead to “possibilities” with Hattie, but once he realizes she’s more interested in possibilities with the Gatsby-look-alike political rock star, he tries to weasel out of it:

When Buck had originally promised to try to introduce her to Nicolae, he hadn’t thought it through. Now, after hearing Steve rhapsodize about the prominence of Carpathia, he felt trivial calling to ask if he could introduce a friend, a fan. He called Dr. Rosenzweig, “Doc, I feel kinda stupid about this, and maybe you should just say no, that he’s too busy. I know he’s got a lot on his plate and this girl is no one he needs to meet.”

“It’s a girl?”

“Well, a young woman. She’s a flight attendant.”

“You want him to meet a flight attendant?”

Buck didn’t know what to say. That reaction was exactly what he had feared. When he hesitated, he heard Rosenzweig cover the phone and call out for Carpathia. “Doc, no! Don’t ask him!”

As much fun as it is to watch our cocksure protagonist squirm like this, the whole scene is still deeply odd and contrived. None of this would be happening if Plank, Stonagal, Nicolae, President Fitzhugh or the authors had any idea how to go about their jobs. Carpathia is supposed to be the toast of the town in New York and Hattie can’t be the only “fan” or social climber desperate to meet him. You’d think, then, that somebody — his new press secretary, his influential banker-patron, the president who invited this fellow head-of-state to stay at the White House — would be arranging some kind of formal reception at which people might actually be able to meet him without showing up, unannounced, at his hotel suite during the middle of a week day. Buck could have invited Hattie as his guest — a less awkward situation all around as well as a somewhat classier attempt by Buck to pursue his possibilities with Hattie the Hottie. But Buck, Hattie and the authors all lack the patience for such normal behavior. They’re all determined to pursue their various agendas now, so instead we end up with this weird little scenario.

Rosenzweig came back on and said, “Nicolae says that any friend of yours is a friend of his. He has a few moments, but only a few moments, right now.”

Buck and Hattie rushed to the Plaza in a cab. Buck realized immediately how awkward he felt and how much worse he was about to feel. Whatever reputation he enjoyed with Rosenzweig and Carpathia as an international journalist would forever be marred. He would be known as the hanger-on who dragged a groupie up to shake hands with Nicolae.

No sooner has Buck dismissively characterized Hattie as a “groupie” than we get a page of dialogue intended mainly to portray Hattie as pushy and overly forward. This section of the book follows Buck’s perspective amd it’s hard not to read this as another example of how jet-setting international writer Buck Williams is a transparent Mary-Sue stand-in for author Jerry Jenkins. Once Hattie makes it clear that Buck/Jenkins has no “possibilities” with her, she is portrayed as a groupie/slut/bitch. It must be thoroughly, um, disippating for Jenkins to experience such rejection from a fictional female that he created.

Here again we should probably try to entertain the possibility that the authors are attempting some subtle form of unreliable narration. Buck, after all, has not yet said the magic words, so he remains a degenerate sinner. Maybe this whole scene is meant to illustrate that Buck’s attitude and actions here are, in fact, sinful. Maybe this is a sophisticated attempt to show that Buck’s misogyny borne of rejection and his self-centered refusal to see Hattie as valuable apart from her potential as a sexual conquest are evidence of his bad behavior, not hers.

Would that it were so, but unfortunately that interpretation contradicts everything else these books these books have to say about women and men. Every attitude expressed by Buck here — his condescending exploitation, his bitter, spiteful frustration — is reinforced later in the book or the series by born-again characters intended to be perceived as wholly reliable narrators. Hattie refuses to be merely a sexless and submissive helpmeet, so she is condemned as a slut. These are, in the world of Left Behind, binary options for women.

In the hallway Hattie stopped by a mirror and checked her face. A bodyguard opened the door, nodded at Buck, and looked Hattie over from head to toe. She ignored him, craning her neck to find Carpathia. Dr. Rosenzweig emerged from the parlor. “Cameron,” he said, “a moment please.”

Buck excused himself from Hattie, who looked none too pleased. Rosenzweig pulled him aside and whispered, “He wonders if you could join him alone first?”

There follows a bit of less-than-intriguing intrigue between Buck and Nicolae, which we’ll get back to later. Their conversation ends with Buck saying:

“I just wanted to apologize for bringing this girl up to meet you. She’s just a flight attendant, and –”

“Nobody is just anything,” he said, taking Buck’s arm. “Everyone is of equal value, regardless of their station.”

Carpathia led Buck to the door, insisting he be introduced. Hattie was appropriate and reserved, though she giggled when Carpathia kissed her on each cheek. He asked her about herself, her family, her job. Buck wondered if he had ever taken a Carnegie course on how to win friends and influence people.

If we can trust Buck’s “Carnegie” quip, then perhaps there was something too-slick and salesmanlike about Carpathia’s conversation with Hattie. Even so, the contrast between this encounter and her recent conversations with Rayford is remarkable. Even if it’s only feigned, Nicolae expresses an interest in her as a person; Rayford just held the phone at arm’s length, rolling his eyes and waiting for her to stop boring him with talk about her family and her fears so that he could invite her over for a sermon. Nicolae concludes the conversation by shaking hands with Hattie, kissing her hand and saying “Miss Durham, it shall be my pleasure should our paths cross again.” That’s more courtesy and affection than Rayford displayed in all the years of his non-affair.

Buck ushered her out and found her nearly overcome. “Some guy, huh?” he said.

“He gave me his number!” she said, nearly squealing.

“His number?”

Hattie showed Buck the business card Nicolae had handed her. It showed his title as president of the Republic of Romania, but his address was not Bucharest as one would expect. It was the Plaza Hotel, his suite number, phone number, and all. Buck was speechless. Carpathia had penciled in another phone number, not at the Plaza, but also in New York. Buck memorized it.

Buck’s two-pronged jealousy here invites another round of Buck/Nicolae slash, but apart from the easy jokes, it also reminds me of another story that illustrates what this rise-of-the-Antichrist tale might have been in the hands of more capable writers. This trio of Nicolae, Buck and Hattie reminds me of the trio of Willie Stark, Jack Burden and Anne Stanton at the center of All the King’s Men. That tragedy of hubris and the seduction of power could have provided a template for this story, but LaHaye and Jenkins aren’t interested in tragedy because they’re not interested in humanity and the choices we humans make.

“We can eat at the Pan-Con Club,” Hattie said.

Every time she says that, I think of the Kit Kat Club and then I get this mental image of the Pan-Con Girls doing the Fosse choreography to “Don’t Tell Mama.” Come to think of it, Cabaret could also have served as a template for this rise-of-the-Antichrist story (complete, again, with a Buck/Burden writer-as-narrator figure). But that, again, would have required an appreciation for tragedy — and despite some similarities, Hattie Durham is no Sally Bowles.

“I don’t really want to see this pilot at one, but I think I will, just to brag about meeting Nicolae.”

“Oh, now it’s Nicolae, is it?” Buck managed, still shaken by Carpathia’s business card. “Trying to make someone jealous?”

“Something like that,” she said.

All this business about business cards and phone numbers suddenly reminds Buck of what book he’s in.

“Would you excuse me a second?” he said. “I need to make a call …”

  • cjmr

    I want to be one of those flat thin wing pieces. Maybe a left wing.
    Lego is teh awsum.

    That would be a seriously geeky open thread topic:
    What LEGO are you?

  • Ecks

    GROOOUUPP HUUUUG (careful o’ your strings everyone*)!!!
    * based on the premise that the entire slactivist comments threads are actually populated by only two people with an army of aliases, intractable self loathing, and a pretty good sense of humour.

  • Socks of Sullenness

    *Hugs.*
    Look, mum, no strings.

  • Salamanda

    What LEGO are you?
    Ooo, I’m one of those little single-unit round nubs used for lights in the more sci-fi type sets. A pretty green one. Or maybe one of those transparent blue pieces meant to serve as windows for your badass space pod.
    Oh man. My brother and I were huge Lego freaks. We had an enormous toybox full of multiple sets, all thrown together into one big hodgepodge. I don’t think we ever built anything according to actual instructions…
    Of course, that big of a box (trunk, really) made it difficult to locate particular types after a while. So we sort of had this running code:
    “Hey, can you keep an eye out for a 8×2 blue flat?”
    “Yeah. I need a few 2×1 blacks if you come across any.”
    He and I both liked creating starships (instructions, phhht) and I seemed to have a fondness for building houses. Not just cutesy little closed up homes with one room, but realistic houses to scale, with reasonably convincing toilets and furniture and food. Obsessive over detail, much? Perhaps.
    Oh, and I built the Dawn Treader once. It was pretty kickass.
    As if this thread isn’t heinously long enough, but…what were all of your favorite things to build? :)

  • Rozzen

    One of the things I liked about Lego is that unlike other toys like playmobil (that I also liked, mind), you can stage real fights with real damage and real repairs. Like when your knigts do tourneys, you can actually tell who won and who got thrown of his horse ! And spaceships actually crash !
    What LEGO are you?
    I’d be the 2×6 wedge shape. The one that you use to make all the cool shapes especially spaceships.

  • http://jesurgislac.greatestjournal.com Jesurgislac

    Every year at Christmas my mom bought the three of us Lego sets with appropriate instructions, and gave them to us at lunch so we’d spend the afternoon building them and she and my dad could sleep peacefully. (Of course, this stopped working when we were in our 20s. ;-)
    Plus, we had three enormous boxes one year of the basics – the 2 by 6s and so on – and so we had three big drawersful in the cupboard of enough lego for projects beyond belief. I never did the Dawn Treader, but I used to build houses. Fantasy houses, usually, because that way I could include more cool gadgets from the kits. My brother built bridges. My sister built cars. The instructions always got lost.

  • SueW

    Ohmygod, not a Lego thread! I want to be the motor. Before some geeky kid like myself takes it apart to see how it works, that is.
    Ever take candy Legos to a party where they were playing with real Legos? The candy ones are very realistic. You should have seen the look on one guy’s face when I popped one in my mouth. :-D

  • 85% Duane

    but I used to build houses. Fantasy houses, usually, because that way I could include more cool gadgets from the kits.
    Lego McMansions?

  • Jeff

    Lego McMansions?
    Only a greedy asshole would… ooops, wrong thread!
    I’d be a base. Everyone needs something to build on! Gears are fun, too.

  • Salamanda

    Plus, we had three enormous boxes one year of the basics – the 2 by 6s and so on – and so we had three big drawersful in the cupboard of enough lego for projects beyond belief. I never did the Dawn Treader, but I used to build houses. Fantasy houses, usually, because that way I could include more cool gadgets from the kits. My brother built bridges. My sister built cars. The instructions always got lost.
    OMG Jesu, your family and my family need to have a Lego party, stat! Combining our forces, we could be unstoppable! *MUAHAHAHAHA* We could build Sprawlville! In space! On ice!

  • http://jesurgislac.greatestjournal.com Jesurgislac

    Sorry, Salamanda – we’d also need a time machine. And where would we get the Lego for that?

  • Anonymous

    “I think the notion of feminine vs. masculine clothes is a little weird to me outright. Why am I supposed to wear one thing because I have a penis, and you are supposed to wear something else because you don’t?”
    Clothes are made to fit a particular body shape, most of the time modern people wear clothes that have been made to fit a range of sizes by using fabric which stretches and numerous straps, buttons, and similar fastenings. But for special occasions, or if you’re an unusual size you make or buy clothes to fit you exclusively. Male and female body shapes are quite different on average, although as with height there’s an overlap, these physical cues are used to subconsciously classify people you aren’t looking at yet, which can cause some confusion when they’re mistaken.
    So far as I can tell the reason why you can’t easily buy e.g. a summer frock for a 190cm tall bloke (long arms, no bust) is that there’s no market. The people designing and making these clothes don’t care, but if you can’t sell it in volume then you can’t justify making it. If you make stuff yourself, or know someone who is handy with a sewing machine then it’s not a problem. For me the problem is always skirt length, I have terrible legs (and haven’t shaved them since I was a teenager) not to mention the knees, so I want a floor-length skirt, but I’m in the upper tier of sizes for men, let alone women. Fortunately I don’t like feminine clothes enough to need a whole wardrobe of them.
    I guess none of that really answers your question, perhaps the best answer is, “it’s just a meaningless cultural difference” like the fact that women like flowers or men tend to be interested in sports. Don’t read too much into it (in particular, don’t assume that every difference you encounter is the patriarchy trying to keep women down or feminists trying to have their cake and eat it).

  • Ecks

    I guess none of that really answers your question, perhaps the best answer is, “it’s just a meaningless cultural difference” like the fact that women like flowers or men tend to be interested in sports. Don’t read too much into it (in particular, don’t assume that every difference you encounter is the patriarchy trying to keep women down or feminists trying to have their cake and eat it).
    Yup, I agree. Like I say, it’s pretty arbitrary (“thin fabric and skirts… err, oh that’s definitely for women. Couldn’t be any other way”). Like the rest of the planet, it’s mostly harmless. The only real problem is how excited people get about enforcing it, and that it helps sustain the perception that men and women are entativitily (with due apppologies for jargon) different things… which would seem to back up them being treated differently in other more important areas.
    All of which isn’t TERRIBLE, and it’s nothing can’t be worked around by sensible people… I just worry how few sensible people there are out there, so the whole issue bugs me minorly when I think about it too much.
    On more imortant topics, lego candy is kick ass. I love that you can actually make them work to some extent, and lock some of them together.
    True story: We were canoe camping up north a few years ago, and I stood lego candy in hand on this rock that sloped steeply into the lake when I slipped. My friend ran over and found me hanging by one hand to the rock, and the other hand to the lego candy.
    “Give me your hand!” he says
    “No, take the candy! save the candy!” says I.

  • Jeff

    Sorry, Salamanda – we’d also need a time machine. And where would we get the Lego for that?
    You could ask these guys. They have access to one.

  • http://d-84.livejournal.com cjmr’s husband

    Did someone say Lego Time Machine???
    (that’s my store on BrickLink, mention slacktivist and get 10% off)

  • Jeff

    On gender relations, gender politics and gamers, today’s xkcd is brilliant. The forum discussion is mostly good, but there’s a few weenies who JUST DON’T GET IT, even after reading the strip. Linked to in the comments is an essay by a female IRCer and gamer, called “OMG Girlz Don’t Exist on teh Intarweb!!!!1″.
    I thought it appropriate considering some of the things we’ve discussed.
    One study found that a silent nick on IRC would receive 25 (twenty-five!) times as many harassing posts if the nick was obviously female, as opposed to male or ambiguous. Blech!

  • Rozzen

    Ha ! I should really play WoW then ! It sounds like fun :D

  • Jeff

    Ha ! I should really play WoW then ! It sounds like fun :D
    From what I’ve seen of your posts, I think you would blow more than a few minds. On the other hand, it would decrease the amount of time you have available for Slacktivist, and we can’t have that!

  • http://grimhalla.blogspot.com/ Deoridhe

    WoW is a blast. I was amused the other night when we were doing a Scarlet Monestary run (one of the instances – lots of humans to kill, and some great lewt) and the character genders were the same as the offline genders – 2 female/3 male – but the people didn’t match; one of the males was playing a female toon, and one of the females was playing a male toon.
    Many of my female friends play WoW, and one of the leaders of my ex-roomie’s raiding guild is female, so I don’t tend to think about it much anymore except when listening to general chat and the idiotic, misogynistic statements some of those morons spout. Last time that happened, there were five women on. *snicker*
    Oh, and because I feel I must: FOR THE HORDE!!!

  • QLH

    How did he have time to have business cards made with his NYC hotel address?

  • Phoenix

    I know it would take years and it’s probably not in your best interest, but part of me is so hoping you get to the part where they introduce Leah.  The way Buck and Rayford treat her is out of this world awful and it Just.Does.Not.Stop.  They even acknowledge how bad it is from time to time (before going right back to doing it some more).