Church bulletin announcements

Religion News Service reports that:

The Southern Baptist Convention is again considering changing its name, after a national survey found 40 percent of Americans hold an unfavorable view of the denomination. Somewhat surprisingly, the SBC’s negatives were highest in the South.

It’s not surprising. To paraphrase Ed Koch, in the South, people know the SBC.

Those negatives probably aren’t helped by Southern Baptist bookstores taking a firm stance in favor of breast cancer.

Lifeway Christian Bookstores, which is owned by the Southern Baptist Convention … is making news again for having pulled from its stores pink Bibles that were designed to promote awareness of breast cancer, with proceeds going the Susan G. Komen for the Cure Foundation for breast cancer screenings.  It turns out that some Komen funding had gone to Planned Parenthood for exams and mammograms in the past.

In response to this sort of thing, Wonkette usually provides the best headlines: “Wingnuts Refuse to Sell Breast Cancer-Fighting Bibles, Out of Love for Cancer.”

Timothy Kincaid writes:

Although Komen’s funding of specific Planned Parenthood programs paid for 139,000 breast exams and about 5,000 mammograms, detecting 177 cases of cancer in the past five years, the lives of those 177 women are immaterial. They are just collateral damage in a Culture War.

* * * * * * * * *

Christianity Today:Yet Another College Investigates InterVarsity Christian Fellowship“:

The [University of Buffalo's] Student Association issued the suspension after campus newspaper The Spectrum reported that the IVCF chapter’s treasurer Steven Jackson was pressured to resign from his leadership role because of his sexual orientation. IVCF requires its student leaders to sign a statement affirming several basic Christian beliefs, including the authority of the Bible.

Both IVCF and CT are engaged in a bit of question-begging there. I think they’re both genuinely bewildered by the idea that “the authority of the Bible” doesn’t simply and obviously entail all of the cultural assumptions they mean by it. Those who are not deeply immersed in the American evangelical subculture don’t appreciate that “the authority of the Bible” here is a synonym for “God says the treasurer of your club can’t be gay.”

* * * * * * * * *

I managed to quote Warren Throckmorton on the subject of the Golden Rule without linking to one of his favorite projects: The Golden Rule Pledge.

The pledge is a Christian anti-bullying effort that started on the Day of Silence in 2008.

GLBT students and peers as well as other who appear different have been the target of harassment, violence and scorn. We believe this is wrong. The church should lead the way in combatting violence and harassment in schools. … One way to live out our faith is to treat others fairly and with respect.

They’re promoting this pledge among Christian students:

I pledge to treat others the way I want to be treated.

This is a Good Thing.

* * * * * * * * *

Mike Todd points us toward John Cusack’s description of Jesus:

Who are your heroes in real life?

Let’s go with Jesus. Not the gay-hating, war-making political tool of the right, but the outcast, subversive, supreme adept who preferred the freaks and lepers and despised and doomed to the rich and powerful. The man Garry Wills describes “with the future in his eyes … paradoxically calming and provoking,” and whom Flannery O’Connor saw as “the ragged figure who moves from tree to tree in the back of [one’s] mind.”

Garry Wills’ What Jesus Meant is, again, a book I highly recommend. And apparently so does Lloyd Dobler.

As Satanic as a silkworm …” Helen Walne enjoys a yoga class on Monday nights. Despite what Fr. Gabriele Amorth and Fraternity Brother Mark Driscoll say, Walne says she doesn’t feel like a Satanist.

At Adventus, RMJ shares an astonishing story about Oscar Romero in which the martyred archbishop gives a wrong answer, and then a proper response.

Stephanie Simon offers a generous, insightful profile of an earnest experiment in “New Monasticism”: “What chores would Jesus do?

NOM — the anti-gay National Organization for Marriage — sings another chorus of “They’ll Know We Are Christians by Our Venomous Spite and Spittle-Flecked Resentment of Others.”

J.G.C. Wise of The Curator celebrates the many, diverse roots of Christmas and criticizes the corporatism of it — in verse: “The Devolution of Christmas.”

For Advent, the writers of the Empire Remixed blog are asking us to imagine. You may say they’re just dreamers, but they’re not the only ones.

And finally, a little while back I joked that Louis Menand’s discussion of George F. Kennan accidentally provided a perfect one-sentence summary of Reinhold Niebuhr’s theology: “We need to be realists because we cannot trust ourselves to be moralists.” Since then I’ve been musing about other such one-sentence summaries.

So here’s my attempt at Dietrich Bonhoeffer in one sentence: “I’m walking away from Omelas, but I’m not leaving without that kid.

(Would that John Cusack joke above have been funnier if I’d said Lane Meyer? Martin Blank? Hoops McCann?)

  • P J Evans

    With the previous version, you could set it to show ads on specific pages. For me, it depends on the site. (Some ads are more annoying than others.)

  • Anonymous

    No popups here, using latest version of FF, with adblock disabled on Patheos.

    My standard thing with ad-blocking is that I have it on by default, but if I visit a site lots then I turn it off. Really annoying ads get blacklisted everywhere, though.

  • Anonymous

    I grinned at the Ruth Institute poll about whether or not 11 year olds are mentally able to determine their gender.  I know some trans-positive folks who are likely to vote “Yes” just to make the point that NOM’s ideas aren’t welcome in American society.

  • http://profiles.google.com/marc.k.mielke Marc Mielke

    The name change does coincide with two things that DID make them better: Warehouse 13 and Haven. 

  • http://profiles.google.com/marc.k.mielke Marc Mielke

    Yeah. It feels wrongheaded to say that as an atheist, but while I admire the artistry and riskiness of post-Beatles Lennon I don’t really care for the actual product. Just like Yoko Ono, actually: I never really got the hate people have for her and respect her as an artist, but find her work unlistenable. 

  • http://stealingcommas.blogspot.com/ chris the cynic

    Indeed the SeeFee channel seems to be consistently less likable than the Sci fi channel that preceded it.

    Their movies, I have noticed, still suck but now have a much stronger tendency to suck in ways that aren’t fun.  That’s but one example, and probably a small one as things go, but today is Saturday.

  • http://mordicai.livejournal.com Mordicai

    SyFy? Oh, you mean that Pro Wrestling channel, right?

  • Lori

    Warehouse 13 and Haven: Good, but not even close to making
    up for killing the last season of Farscape.

    It doesn’t matter what they call themselves, I’m never letting that go.

  • http://dpolicar.livejournal.com/ Dave

    > whether or not 11 year olds are mentally able to determine their gender

    Wait, what, huh? I’m coming in late to this, and I think I must have misunderstood this… is what sense is this in question? When I was 11, I was pretty clear about my gender, and most of the 11-year-olds I’ve met are pretty clear about it as well. And some are not, which is also perfectly fine. But the idea that 11-year-olds as a class might not be mentally capable of this feat is just puzzling.

    The only way I can make sense of this is if I assume that “determining my gender” refers to something I do only once, more-or-less irrevocably, and the question is whether 11-year-olds should be considered capable of making the decision to do that thing.

    But the only reasons I can think of for understanding “determining my gender” to mean that are uncharitable ones.

     

  • http://dpolicar.livejournal.com/ Dave

    > whether or not 11 year olds are mentally able to determine their gender

    Wait, what, huh? I’m coming in late to this, and I think I must have misunderstood this… is what sense is this in question? When I was 11, I was pretty clear about my gender, and most of the 11-year-olds I’ve met are pretty clear about it as well. And some are not, which is also perfectly fine. But the idea that 11-year-olds as a class might not be mentally capable of this feat is just puzzling.

    The only way I can make sense of this is if I assume that “determining my gender” refers to something I do only once, more-or-less irrevocably, and the question is whether 11-year-olds should be considered capable of making the decision to do that thing.

    But the only reasons I can think of for understanding “determining my gender” to mean that are uncharitable ones.

     

  • PurpleGirl

    I use Adblocker and Flashblocker because animated ads and stuff create a neurological problem for me which can cause physical pain. I don’t feel bad about a blog’s revenue implications at all. If it will keep me from experiencing a problem or pain, I’m good with it. I protect myself first.

  • FangsFirst

    Secret hint: Free “likes” for all pro-Farscape comments.

    Just sayin’.
    I don’t know a Crichton-styled leather vest for nothing. Even if almost no one ever knows what it is.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jonathan-Pelikan/100000903137143 Jonathan Pelikan

    Ah, I never knew that about adblocker, I really appreciate you spreading the word here. I’ll definitely look into this, especially on this old rig. It’s behind on updates and begging to be hit by a good virus.

  • Anonymous

    I’m pretty sure they’re referring to transgender people, because that seems like the sort of thing that would cause a NOM Moral Panic–and because a 12-year-old TS kid in Germany recently got HRT to become female.  Unfortunately, it comes across as, “Do you think a preteen is too stupid to figure out whether it’s a boy or a girl?”

  • Anonymous

    If you use FireFox, the NoScript add-on is good too.  It’s easy to set it to allow non-annoying ads, and to give it permissions for that one site you trust without leaving you unprotected from the less-desirable parts of the Internet.  And its default is to block EVERYTHING Java, Flash, ActiveX, etc. until you specifically allow them from specific sites.  I’ve been to some rather nasty parts of the Internet with it and emerged completely unscathed.

    (Just make sure you set it to Allow Disqus, or the comments here will look all wonky and you won’t be able to type.)