The prefix ‘pro-’ was nounced dead Tuesday …

The prefix ‘pro-’ was nounced dead Tuesday after suffering from what grammatical fessionals describe as longed strain and abuse. Officials have ruled the death a homicide.

“It was such a positive, upbeat little prefix,” said Dr. Elaine McKenzie, chief coroner for the Oxford English Dictionary and a lific author. “But there’s only so much twisting and straining a word can endure.”

Years of imper use and tracted, found abuse had a gressive, cumulative effect, McKenzie said. The final, fatal blow came Tuesday when the Susan G. Komen for the Cure foundation, America’s leading breast-cancer charity, adopted a new policy hibiting grants to vide cancer-screening for low-income women.

“This was in response to political pressure from so-called ‘-life’ activists,”  McKenzie noted. “That was just more than the poor prefix could bear. In what possible sense could hibiting cancer-screening for poor women be considered ‘favorably disposed toward’ life?”

Meanwhile, English speakers struggled Tuesday to come to grips with the newly duced gap in their language.

“It’s a shock,” said Stanford fessor Russell A. Berman, president of the Modern Language Association. “It creates a very large blem for English-speakers. It was such a digious little prefix, one each of us used bably dozens of times every day. I will miss it.”

Berman said replacing the slain prefix would be a challenging ject, but that the cess had already begun and the association was already considering posed alternatives.

  • FangsFirst

     

    Squirrel. Girl.

    By the time of that story, Starlin had decided never to work for Marvel again–it was already too late :(

  • http://apocalypsereview.wordpress.com/ Apocalypse Review

    What Lori said. I can bone up a little on stats if you need it, but I’m no great whiz at it. Keep me in mind and you can alwasy comment on my blog if you need to, I check my dashboard at least once a day for new comments.

  • Apocalypse Review

    Also: Can Canadians donate to PP or will PP get a crapton of trouble over it?

  • http://jamoche.dreamwidth.org/ Jamoche

    Komen’s rule is that an organization loses its funding if there’s an investigation and may regain it if cleared of any wrong-doing. 

    Not surprised. A charity that really did have everyone’s best interests in mind wouldn’t set up a rule like that because of the chance of accidentally getting into a situation where the investigation is baseless and politically motivated; it’s obvious that in Komen’s case this was no accident.

    (And while we’re on the subject of Death and Komen – their slogan that “everyone deserves a lifetime” always makes me think of what Death of the Endless said to someone who complained when he died: “You got what everyone did. You got a lifetime”.)

  • Lori

    To the best of my knowledge there are no restrictions on PP receiving donations from non-USians. Their online donor form allows you to chose a country other than the US when filling in your address. Presumably if outside donations weren’t allowed they’d have disabled that. 

  • Anonymous

    There was some muttering in the right-wing newspapers in Britain before the cervical cancer vaccine was introduced because it might “encourage young girls to be promiscuous”. This petered out when parents ~ who had to give their consent, as the target group was under-age ~ decided pretty much en masse that (a) they trusted their daughters, and (b) hormonal adolescents will do bloody silly things regardless so they may as well be given whatever protection is available.

  • Mary Kaye

    A ray of hope in this sorry mess:  more than 6000 people donated to PP yesterday, giving a total of over $650,000, which is nearly enough to replace a *year* of Komen funding.

    Here is the story.

    It also notes that some Komen branches are fighting the national decision.  I wish them luck.

  • http://redwoodr.tumblr.com Redwood Rhiadra

    Mother Jones proves Komen’s story about cutting off funding due to the investigation to be complete hypocrisy – Komen is still funding Penn State, which is… under investigation by the federal government!

    http://motherjones.com/mojo/2012/02/komen-foundation-gave-75-million-grant-penn-state

  • Lori

    The decision to defund PP is not Koman’s only politically motivated new policy. They will also no longer give funding for any research using stem cells. The policy appears to including those in existing stem cell lines, which puts Koman to the Right of George Bush on the issue. 

    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/02/02/1061151/-New-Komen-Foundation-policy-also-refuses-funding-for-embryonic-stem-cell%C2%A0research?detail=hide&via=blog_1

    Many people have been calling for Koman to refund PP, but honestly I think that between the problems they already had with high administrative costs, pink-washing and being litigation happy and their new hard Right political turn it makes more sense for donors to simply “defund” Koman by giving their money to better organizations. 

  • Lori

    Related to the Koman flap, there’s now a tumblr for people to share their stories about care they’ve received from Planned Parenthood. It isn’t run by or affiliated with PP. The person who started it describes herself as a fan and just wants to support PP by giving clients a place to share their stories. Check it out if you have a positive PP story you think you’d like to share. 

    http://plannedparenthoodsavedme.tumblr.com/

  • http://apocalypsereview.wordpress.com/ Invisible Neutrino

    Swell. :) Just hit up PP’s website and warmed up the old credit card.

  • Rikalous

    Good Omens Death was a stretch. He came off as more disinterested in humanity than actually malicious.

  • Anonymous

    Oh, for fuck’s sake. It’s like they’re not even trying to not be outright flaming assholes. Back in my day, assholes at least attempted to front like they were normal decent humans.

    Related to which, I’m 30-some articles into my review of what one guy called the “mountains of research” about the abortion-breast cancer link that the Big Med Machine is studiously ignoring, and it’s jaw-dropping how easy they are to refute once you do the PITA legwork of tracking the actual articles down. I mean, not even refute — most of them just flat-out say the total opposite of what the fearmongers claim they say. Sometimes in bold type, right in the abstract. Some of the fearmonging is weaseling and cherry-picking, but I’m kind of astounded at how much of it is just sheer asshole bluster.: throw a study with scary words in the title, sit back, and wait for everyone to cower before the title.

    I’m a little disappointed. I knew they were mendacious; I didn’t know they were lazy.

  • Sgt. Pepper’s Bleeding Heart

    There is a program (out of the CDC, I think, and run through the state Health Departments) called the Breast and Cervical Cancer Project. If you are * a woman (men who think they may have breast cancer are out of luck) * without insurance (if you have it but can’t afford the copays/coinsurance, you’re out of luck)* with income less than twice the Federal Poverty Level* between specific ages (under 65, above 40 or 50 depending on the screening you’re seeking)then you may be eligible to register through your state to get a free screening.

    Wow. For us, the following are covered by the public program (called Medicare, but unlike the US available to all citizens with no other eligibility requirements):

    - regular mammograms for women 50+
    - regular Pap smears to all women
    - regular FOBT (for bowel cancer) for all people over…45? 50?
    - regular digital rectal exam for prostatic hypertrophy for men over…40? 50?
    - regular visions checks and glaucoma tests for everyone
    - hearing tests for children
    - STI screening at sexual health clinics on demand
    - a bunch of tests for pregnant women and neonates – don’t know all of them off the top of my head, but it includes chlamydia testing during pregnancy and a genetic screen for PKU immediately after birth
    - the standard stuff in a regular primary care checkup – blood pressure, cholesterol, blood glucose
    - and a whole slew of vaccinations, of course (and parents are paid for meeting certain immunisation milestones for their kids)

    Plus high-risk population groups (e.g. Indigenous people, diabetics) are eligible for extra screening/check-ups for various conditions.

    Libertarians? How is this not worth paying a little bit of tax for?

  • Sgt. Pepper’s Bleeding Heart

    If I posted some stats, could anyone pinch-hit?     

    Yup. Throw ‘em up and I’ll have a look.

    Unless you already have and I haven’t got to that part of the thread yet, in which case…sorry for my laziness :)

  • Tricksterson

    Not to detract from the seriousness of the issue but does anyone else think Fred waschanneling Jasper Fforde?  The article read like something that might show up in his Thursday Next series.  On the other hand if one is to steal it might as well be from the best.