My Tuesday column at First Things is up. The year is hardly begun and already it seems like it will be an anxious one. Here I take a look at the anxieties born of the shooting of Gabrielle Giffords and the deaths of six others:
As you read this, those six human beings–mostly anonymous to the world but beloved of their families and friends–are being grieved, waked, remembered, mourned, celebrated and interred. They were murdered at a shopping center, on January 8 by an incoherent, mentally ill young man who was somehow able to get hands on a gun.
With the exception of Zimmerman and Green, the dead were senior citizens. Had they not been killed, it is likely that a couple of them would have lived long enough to observe the nation enter into serious discussion about what will be the defining issue of the new decade: the value of human life when it is “advanced” in age, imperfect in form, and too expensive to justify on the healthcare spread sheets. They are now past wondering if the lives they had, and wished to keep, would pass cost-analysis muster. In the language of the most-compassionate among us, they—and their families—have been “spared” those “quality of life” anxieties.
Zimmerman had just entered the ripest years of adulthood–the time when adolescent dreaming has been dashed upon the rocks of practicality; first-strivings have mercifully passed, and one is finally getting a sense of self, where one fits in, and what is still possible. His was an age of dreams re-defined, then refined. As an aide to Gabrielle Giffords, a congresswoman who–by all accounts–is liked and respected by her D.C. colleagues, Zimmerman could justly envision a future full of promise–one protected from most downturns, economic or electoral, thanks to the useful connections gathered during meetings, or purposeful strolls through the halls of the capital building. The pre-empting of all of that promise is grievous. And doubtlessly for the hundreds of thirty-ish political aides working in federal buildings and state capitals–those whom we called “young guns” before last weekend–Green’s violent death has produced a life-quality-impacting anxiety from which they and their families cannot be spared, but which over time will wane.
Please read the rest here
Also, check out Tim Dalrymple’s: Loughner Belonged to the Insane Party:
Although Americans are inclined to locate everyone on the Left-to-Right polarity, some people are simply off the grid. Loughner is no more a conservative for opposing the American government than Osama bin Laden is a liberal for hating Bush.
UPDATE: Ed Morrissey is looking at polls indicating the public is not buying the mainstream construct. We’ll see.
Margaret Cabaniss at Inside Catholic: Understanding Evil.





Thanks for the link to the Dalrymple piece. It was a breath of fresh air.
Thanks for the posts on this horrid tragedy.
My thoughts are prayers are with those poor victims and this struggling Country.
Interesting new blog site?
Anyhow, Hillary Clinton is up to her ugly ways as well, and the entire Democratic Party has not learned a thing. They really seem to need professional help – didn’t the Wellstone Memorial Hatred impart any lessons?
See:
“One Arizona nutjob is not the moral equivalent of the 9/11 terrorists, no matter what Hillary Clinton says — and she should be ashamed of herself for saying so.
At a weekend town hall meeting in the United Arab Emirates, the secretary of state responded to a question about 9/11 thusly: “We have extremists in my country” — Rep. Gabrielle Giffords “was just shot by an extremist in our country.”
This is patent nonsense. Jared Loughner is a howling-at-the-moon psychopath. For Clinton to equate him with Islamic terrorists means:
* She believes it, which is beyond stupefying.
* Or she was deliberately denigrating her country while a guest in a foreign nation, which is beyond shameful.”
Fred Phelps and his group are planning to picket the funeral of the little girl (and presumably the judge) because they are Catholic. I like the response of giant angel wings to shield the funeral http://www.cnn.com/2011/US/01/11/arizona.funeral.westboro/index.html?hpt=T1
I think Rasmussen polled on this, with results pointing towards not believing the media narrative being peddled (57%-36%). But, a third of those polled does believe the narrative.
However, I don’t find this tragic shooting to be a subject suitable for polling.
[I happen to agree with you. I wondered who underwrote the poll -admin]