Catholicism and Bad Religion: a One-Two Punch

Last year, the book I spent more time urging you to read than any other was Robert Barron’s Catholicism, which I called a “course in revolution”, arguing that a better-understanding of who we Catholics are, where we came from and what we embody in the world can be a social and political game-changer like nothing else.

This year, I believe I am going to be nagging you to read Ross Douthat’s Bad Religion: How We Became a Nation of Heretics as a sort of “companion book” to Catholicism. Once we know who we are a people of faith, we need to understand what that has meant to our society, how we’ve ceded our own place in the public arena, and how to get it back so the revolution of mind, heart and soul can really take place.

Interestingly enough, the two links
I’m keen to give you today involve both Barron and Douthat, and public faith. At his Word on Fire blog Father Robert Barron has compiled a slew of reports of Christian persecution around the world, adding:

We’d all like to think that things are getting better. That religious tolerance is the norm. That people now are able to worship in peace without fear of reprisal. That is, unfortunately for Christians around the world, far from the case. Please take a minute to read these stories and pray for their plights.

The persecution and silencing of Christians in other parts of the world have always seemed so very remote to Americans, for whom the freedom of religion is an enumerated and codified fundamental right. Religious persecution, we think, cannot happen here. And yet, over the past few years we have noticed both a double standard about religion (President Obama may talk about Jesus; President Bush was ridiculed for it. Democrats may address constituents from a church-pulpit; a Republican dare not attempt it without hearing faux-outrage about “looming theocracies!”) and a genuine attempt in powerful quarters to limit the rights, speech and mission of churches. This administration alone has argued that churches have no right to define ministry and name its ministers, that their successful programs in aid to victims of human trafficking are no longer useful unless they include abortion, that church-run institutions “have no conscience” and therefore may be compelled by government to violate their precepts and teachings, and that those working for clerical or church interests are no longer qualified to receive student loan forgiveness.

Recently I heard a pastor say, “in America, religious persecution will involve silencing you, minimizing your presence and penalizing your teachings. At least to start.” He’s probably right and that is why my column at First Things this week focuses on Douthat’s thoughtful book.:

Douthat’s book is a neatly laid-out dissertation on the people of faith and their place in American society. It is a deft chronicle of where faith communities went right—spanning a heyday of religious commentary and social activism, from John Courtney Murray to Martin Luther King—where they gravely misstepped (through over-accommodation, self-defeating scriptural scholarship, and the inevitable discovery of “the God Within”) and where, through the embrasure of so-called “prosperity gospels” catering to the worst instincts of a post-binge capitalist society, they have simply gone mad.

Douthat also lays a humbly offered groundwork for how and where the churches may yet recover their sense of both social place and mission. Not surprisingly, it will involve a confrontation with the self that will be as painful as any bacchanal’s bleary-eyed gaze into a well-lit morning mirror; groaning pleas for mercy will make a slow, careful nod toward justice.

You can read the whole piece, here.

Saint Bernadette Soubirous: a Quiet Riot – UPDATED

Today is the feastday of Saint Bernadette Soubirous, the visionary of Lourdes — a woman brought up in such mean poverty that her whole family lived in the equivalent of a jail cell. She was a shepherdess; a poor student who could barely learn her catechism, yet was able to burst into her pastor’s office with the words “Immaculate Conception” pouring forth; a visionary who faced public ridicule for digging with her hands, until the healing spring showed forth the next day.

I love Bernadette. Her life was not long, and after the remarkable events at the grotto at Massabielle, it really wasn’t her own. Harangued for the rest of her life by theologians and churchmen who either doubted her story or could not accept that someone so ignorant would be blessed with visions of downright biblical proportions, and so connected with a dogma of such complexities and depths of nuance. They forgot, apparently, that throughout scripture God uses the most surprising and often humble people to do his will. But Bernadette had a sense of humor and a completely self-effacing way, and she possessed the forthrightness that is so characteristic of us Catholic peasants. When these theologians and bosses doubted her to her face, she countered, “my job is to inform, not to convince.”

She said it with perfect politeness, but there is such a shrug of detachment contained within those words. She answered their questions and kissed it up to God as to whether anyone believed her. Once we’ve had a taste of heaven, who cares for the opinions of the falsely exalted on earth? And Bernadette — who was remarkably grounded — would have counted herself among the falsely exalted. Told that pictures of her were being sold at Massabielle for ten sous, she sighed, “I am not worth that much.”

Can’t you just hear the shrug?

A while back I did a podcast on the Feast of the Immaculate Conception. Because Bernadette is so intimately connected to that dogma, she appears about 60 seconds into the thing, as I recount exactly how Bernadette blew her pastor’s mind. Give a listen, if you like — I wish I still had time to do those!

Father James Martin, who also has a great fondness for Bernadette (his chapter on her in My Life with the Saints is particularly good) shares more, here:

YouTube Preview Image

And Father Dwight on “The Day I Met St. Bernadette

Ecce Homo, Christ’s Church and Homosexuality – UPDATE

My column at First Things this week did not start out addressing the coming, unstoppable and necessary confrontation between the church and the homosexual community, but then I read about Cardinal Christoph Schönborn’s decision to support a gay member of a parish council over the priest who wished to unseat him, and Edward Peter’s sensible response. With Ross Douthat’s excellent, must-read book, Bad Religion; How We Became a Nation of Heretics swirling in my head, the column simply bent to a natural curve:

We only just begun this walk. Christianity, particularly in America, is struggling with balance as it becomes ever more embroiled (willingly or not) in secular matters, but this will be a defining question: how do we follow the Christ’s example to “first see the human being” (ecce homo) while reconciling it with Matthew 19:3-5 and 11-12—words Jesus did not utter by accident?

[. . .]

Douthat’s thoughts here are a kind of dual prompting: a Christianity struggling to reconcile belief with inclusion will have to “get rid of the beam” in its own eye before it will clearly see how to deal with the splinters of human people seeking Christ. And to do that, the church will have to go back to the basics, re-learn them and then re-teach them, but this time not as narrow, fundamentalist do’s and dont’s that excuse us from thinking, but as the fundamentally sophisticated and paradoxical means toward true freedom that they really are.

You can read the rest, here

I believe we are hearing a clarion call for the church to discourage reactionary emotionalism and give deep instruction from a very deep place. If she gets it right, this confrontation can become the finest fruit of the New Evangelization. If she gets it wrong, the lesser fruits will not nourish or strengthen the body of Christ to its potential.

We live in interesting, challenging times. Pray for the leadership of the church in their teaching, and for the laity who advise, recommend and reach out. What is before us is so huge and important that there is absolutely no room for errors based on intellectual laziness or tyrannical sentimentalism.

And by the way, I will write a larger review later, but please take my word for it — Ross Douthat’s book is going to be important for the church. Don’t get the impression it’s all about this issue, because really, Douthat barely writes on it. The book is a comprehensive look at the wrong turns of the Christian church in America, and a humble look at ways to get it right. It is almost like the necessary water-to-the-face that must follow Father Robert Barron’s Catholicism. Barron reminded us where we have come from, and why it is worth staying; Douthat is saying, “stay in truth; take a look at what we’ve done to ourselves and get a grip on the reality of living in the church that must guide us through this age.”

Exciting stuff.

UPDATE I: I have decided I must be a very bad writer, because people seem to think I am advocating Gay Marriage; I am not. I thought I made that clear in my FT column, when I used the citations from Matthew. What I am calling for — or rather, what I believe Douthat is calling for very brilliantly — is a deepening of teaching from the church that sheds more light, less heat, on the paradoxical truth (because God’s truth are so often paradoxes) that the obedience that so many see as nothing but “no” is actually a freeing act that leads to the whole YES that is God.

UPDATE II:
Terry at Abbey-Roads has more thoughts

UPDATE III: Aha! And read this: How Do We Render God Credible in This World?

Related: The Tolerance Disconnect

A GREAT Communion Gift!

It’s almost time for all the little girls in white and the little boys in blue (or white) to make their First Holy Communion, and every year I get folks writing me asking, “what is a good gift?” The kids usually get rosaries and prayerbooks in their “Communion Kits” so, what else is good?

This. This is good

Amy Welborn Dubruiel and Ann Kissane Engelhart collaborated on this charming, delightfully illustrated chronicle of a meeting between Pope Benedict XVI (who has often discusses his own fond memories of his first Communion when talking to kids) and a group of First Communicants.

I had the pleasure of interviewing Ann Kissane Engelhart recently for Patheos, and she shared a favorite moment:

This was one of my favorite interactions. A child named Andrea says, “My catechist told me that Jesus is present in the Eucharist, but how? I can’t see him!” The pope laughed, and pointing to his microphone, went on to use a metaphor of electricity. He explains that “we don’t always see the very deepest things . . . but we can see and feel their effects.” “We do not see the electric current, but we the light.” He said, “People change, they improve—therefore, we don’t see the Lord himself but we see the effects of the Lord: so we can understand that Jesus is present.” He continued to respond to the questions using these kinds of metaphors that children can relate to. He said that going to confession is like cleaning our rooms to prevent the dirt from building up, and to get a fresh start.

Now, come on? How perfect is that, for a First Communion gift?

I would have loved it!

Meanwhile, for the grown-ups
, Amy Welborn’s new book Wish You Were Here: Travels Through Loss and Hope — which I just received in the mail, and which, in my first gleanings, looks to be a gorgeously written little volume — seems like it would be a really good gift for “Communion Mom,” too.

Levering: Jesus and the Demise of Death

In promoting this book giveaway, I realized I had another book I wanted to bring to your attention: the Patheos Book Club is taking a look at Matthew Levering’s Jesus and the Demise of Death — which seems like excellent reading for the season, particularly for this week and next week, if this intro excerpt is any indication!

In his intro, Levering writes:

I seek to contribute to the “robust recovery of apocalyptic teaching and preaching” by setting forth a theology of resurrection and eternal life (Christ’s and ours). By means of a constructive retrieval of Thomas Aquinas’ theology of resurrection and eternal life, I argue that the Church’s traditional eschatology has a biblical perspicacity that has been missed by its critics. Since we learn about resurrection and eternal life from Scripture, I also examine in some detail the approaches of biblical scholars to these topics. This exegetical engagement provides the basis for appropriating Aquinas’ theological insights in a contemporary fashion. In this regard I agree with Joseph Ratzinger that theological insights “must be capable of holding up in biblical terms, but it would be false to treat them as exegetical conclusions because the way we have decided in their favor is that appropriate to systematic thought.”


Don’t get scared.
It sounds over-brainy, perhaps, but having read Levering’s The Betrayal of Charity; the Sins that Sabotague Divine Love I can tell you he’s a very accessible and readable chap and as demonstrated here in this interview with Patheos’ Kathleen Mulhern, a very thoughtful theologian:

Describe the beatific vision. Is this something that can really have an impact in modern life? How?

It is a simple thing, really. We are made for God, which is to say we are made for intimate personal communion in holiness. We are made for the joy and peace of charity and the adventure of wisdom. We are made to know Him as He is. Our earthly lives rightly entail many projects, but none of them fully fits us. The project that we want is actually to be known and loved by Him in such a way that we fully reciprocate that knowledge and love, so that we can really share in His life. Can God enable us to share in His life? Yes. And this is going to be an amazing thing. Jesus’ risen body shows us, too, that our glorified bodies will be able to take part in the communion of charity or true friendship with the triune God—the communion that is what we mean when we talk about beatific vision.

Very timely reading, I think!

Want a Free Book?

Image Books, a Random House imprint, and Patheos are giving away 100 copies of Mother Teresa’s book, Where There is Love, There is God.

Who doesn’t like free books? And it’s Mother Teresa! Who doesn’t like Mother Teresa (yes, yes, I know, Christopher Hitchens, but he may have changed his mind by now…)

Sign up, here! You get the Catholic Portal newsletter, too, if you want it, which — naturally — I hope you will!

Don’t forget to check out Patheos’ Book Club this week!

Is Sentimentalism the Last Step Before Violence?

InDisorientation: How to Go to College Without Losing Your Mind (which I highly recommend), I contributed an essay on the Soft Tyranny of Sentimentalism, wherein I wrote:

If 20th-century atheism rode in on the backs of totalitarian regimes, the 21st-century has delivered unto the world an anti-God, anti-Church movement that fits seamlessly into shallow, postmodern popular culture. Having no need for uprisings and the hardware of destruction, the new fog of faith has crept in on the little cat feet of Sentimentalism and it now sits on its haunches, surveying its splendidly wrought sanctimony.

Sentimentalism is the force of feel-goodism, the means by which we may cast off the conventions of faith and casually dismiss those institutions that refuse to submit to the trending times and morals. The Sentimentalist trusts his feelings over hallowed authority or the urgings of his reason, frequently answering hard religious questions with some noble-sounding phrase like “The God I believe in wouldn’t . . . ” (fill in the blank). What fits in that blank is typically some tenet of traditional faith that isn’t currently fashionable, some moral demand that pop culture considers impossible—and hence, not worth even trying. Thus the Sentimentalist, while believing he follows the inviolate voice of his conscience, is really sniffing after trends, forming his heart according to the sensus fidelium of middlebrow magazines and public radio.

A Sentimentalist cannot reconcile religious convictions—whether rooted in scripture, tradition, or cultural practice—that do not correspond with his own considered feelings, which for him are both weighty and principled. Convinced that the people he loves cannot possibly be denied anything they want by a just God, or that the same just God would not permit deformities, illness, war, childhood abuse, or any of the human sufferings common to us all, he will not participate in a Church so fault-riddled and out-of-step with a generous and enlightened generation as . . . his own.

You can read the whole essay, here. After you have you might want to slip over to Fr. Dwight Longenecker’s place and see what he has been pondering about sentimentalism:

Sentimentality lead to violence when sentimentality becomes an ideology. An ideology is a single driving idea that sweeps every other consideration aside. Those who follow an ideology are always self righteous, and they will use every means possible to enforce their ideology. The ideologue may attempt to argue logically or philosophically, but this will only be a tactic–it is not because he believes that logic, philosophy or theology have any real weight. These disciplines will serve the ideology–the ideology itself may never be questioned. Not only logic and philosophy are subject to the ideology, but all things are subject to the ideology. All other considerations are subject to his ideology–including moral considerations.

So the sentimental ideologue will eventually force his opponent to conform. He will use any means possible–political legislation, financial pressure, social pressure, shouting more loudly, imprisonment and persecution and finally bloodshed if necessary.

Almost makes you want to run off to a hermitage, somewhere! Read it all!

Related: The Caper of the Grape!