Evolving In Monkey Town (Rachel Held Evans) – A Wonderful Picture of Evolutionary Discipleship

About a month ago, I had the opportunity to read Rachel Held Evans’ first book – Evolving in Monkey Town: How a Girl Who Knew All the Answers Learned to Ask the Questions.  It was truly a delightful and refreshingly honest book that had many resonances with my own spiritual journey.  Some of the main questions that we share are those that involve culture wars and also the nature and scope of the Gospel of the Kingdom of God.  Not only so, but we have both had an “evolution” towards embracing theistic evolution.  But what is truly wonderful about this particular book is that it is not primarily about evolutionary biology, but about the nature of the evolution of the church and its disciples.  One of my favorite quotes (ok, in all honesty, her poetic use of language relinquishes several quotations that are worthy of being highlighted) explores the use of evolution as a metaphor rather than simply a biological perspective. [Read more...]

Can Evolution be Christian? An Introduction…

As many of you know, I am of the conviction that evolution and a high view of Scripture are compatible.  There are actually many credible voices in the evangelical community that agree with this.  Tim Keller, CS Lewis, Billy Graham, John Stott, NT Wright, Greg Boyd, Allister McGrath, John Polkinghorne, Scot Mcknight, and many more.

Today, I want to point you toward a wonderful intoduction to this topic, written by Tim Keller.  It is called: CREATION, EVOLUTION, AND CHRISTIAN LAYPEOPLE.  If you take 20 minutes to read this, I think you will appreciate the value of holding God’s Word and God’s World together.  Below are the four broad topics that the article will attempt to process.

In my estimation what current science tells us about evolution presents four main difficulties for orthodox Protestants. The first is in the area of Biblical authority. To account for evolution we must see at least Genesis 1 as non-literal. The questions come along these lines: what does that mean for the idea that the Bible has final authority? If we refuse to take one part of the Bible literally, why take any parts of it literally? Aren’t we really allowing science to sit in judgment on our understanding of the Bible rather than vica versa?
The second difficulty is the confusion of biology and philosophy. [Read more...]

Video to Ponder: "God is Love" Song

This is a video that I came across on my friend Nate McCorkindale’s blog.  It is about God being in essence: Love.  Now, it does not do justice to this topic theologically, but it sure is a fun expression of the transforming power of the love of Christ.  I’d love to hear your thoughts on it and ultimately, hope the theme chorus gets stuck in your head like it is in mine!!!!!!!! Click the following link to watch the video: [Read more...]

What Do I have To Believe to Be a Christian? (Guest Post: Chad Holtz)

“What do I have to believe to be a Christian?”

If you have been part of a church for any amount of time or spent even a few minutes surfing Christian blogs or church websites, this is a question you will encounter ad nauseam.  The question itself is loaded, since it assumes one has to believe something.  The only question to be wrestled with is what that something is.   Our answers will usually illumine the things we value most while simultaneously sorting out who is “in” and who is “out.”   This is a game humans (and animals) love to play.   In fact, if we are honest with ourselves, we might discover upon reflection that much if not most of our identity is rooted in who we distinguish ourselves over and against.   I am not that.  I am not them.

And so it is that when we hear someone in the Christian community say something like “Doctrine is important” or “What we believe matters” we are naturally inclined to hear those sentiments in an exclusionary way.   We assume that person is playing the game we all love to play (even though we all try like mad to pretend as though we aren’t players!).   We assume  the words doctrine or creed are dividing words, systems of an old regime that pit one people against another, draw lines in the sand and dictate what one must believe to be part of the club.

Our suspicions of the words doctrine and creed are not without merit.   The record will clearly show from present day to as far back as anyone cares to look that we have used doctrines and creeds in authoritarian ways.  Sadly, in many cases, we have  lorded over others maliciously.   We have good reason to be cautious.

Those who love the game of “Who’s In or Out?” have co-opted the words doctrine and creed (an easy thing to do) and have insisted there are certain things one must believe to be a Christian.  Those who were cautious and suspicious of those words to begin with because of the ways they are often used quite naturally resisted this Sorting Hat drama and, perhaps showing a bit of dramatic flair of their own, rejected the words outright, choosing instead an ethic of love alone.   Of course, their rejection of doctrines and creeds only made the first group dig their heels in the sand even more, insisting that the second group must be out because, after all, St. Paul said a day would come when people would not put up with sound doctrine (2 Tim. 4:3).  This only served to galvanize the second group, convincing them even further that nothing good can come of a faith built on believing certain things.   [Read more...]