What follows is a special 3 part series by my good friend Dan Martin. He is one of the original 3 bloggers that I got close to when no one else ever read this blog 😉 Not only do we have some roots, but we challenge each other regularly and share many views on theology. You really should read these posts and then read his blog like crazy!
Every kingdom’s culture has powerful symbols that convey the character and sovereignty of that kingdom. Let’s take a look at two highly symbolic elements of the kingdom, and how they aren’t commonly practiced in church, although perhaps they should be.
First the element of sanctuary. We all know the word; until the more-hip “worship center” started taking hold in churches that didn’t want to sound too “churchy,” it was what we called the giant room in most church buildings, where the Sunday morning service was held, and the notion that it was a holy place where people should enter with reverence (and kids should be quiet) is a venerable, if not exactly Biblical, tradition.
But the concept of “sanctuary”–not as restricted space but as refuge–actually has a long and proud history within Judaeo-Christian tradition, and perhaps other faiths as well though I am not familiar with them. 1 Kings 1:50-53 is an example where a man who feared the wrath of the king took refuge in the sanctuary and held onto the horns of the altar for protection. Medieval churches took the concept quite seriously, and for the most part one who had taken sanctuary within a church compound (sometimes the building itself, sometimes the church property as a whole) was out of reach of the civil law as long as he remained there. Part of the scandal of St. Thomas More’s murder was that he was slain in the sanctuary while at prayer. In modern times, some churches in the United States have declared themselves to be sanctuaries for undocumented persons, although I do not know how successful they’ve been with American civil authority.
But a corollary to this idea, and one about which I feel quite viscerally, is that the host country flag has no business being displayed in a sanctuary of the Kingdom of God. From all I’ve heard and seen, this seems to be a particularly American issue; I don’t recall seeing flags in the churches I’ve visited in most other countries, but in American Evangelical churches it’s almost de rigueur. And it’s deeply wrong, I believe, primarily because Americans (especially, but not only, conservative Christian Americans) treat the flag rather like an idol (it’s not possible to “desecrate” something that’s not first sacred).
But if the church is an embassy of the Kingdom of God, the place the American flag should fly–if at all–is not on the platform in the sanctuary, but rather at the front door. Think of it. . .if we recognize our status as citizens of God’s kingdom, resident as ambassadors in the earthly kingdoms of the Powers, then every time we step across the threshold of the Sanctuary (properly taught),we’re stepping into the sovereign territory of our home Kingdom, and that door is a sacred border! Placing the flag at the threshold between the territory of the two kingdoms could be a helpful reminder to the believers of where our final loyalties must lie. We certainly need to rediscover that, when we go out “into the world,” we go as ambassadors, not as citizens.