Darrell L. Bock on the Unity of Luke and Acts

Darrell Bock talks about the relationship between Luke and Acts. Thoughts?

Shane Claiborne Discusses the Sermon on the Mount
Abraham, Evil, and Unsettling Faith (Mark Moore)
N.T. Wright gets asked: "What is the gospel?"
Rob Bell & Oprah talk about what they talk about when they talk about God
  • Chuck McKnight

    I agree. Luke and Acts are almost certainly two halves of a whole. It is a shame that the traditional book order for the New Testament breaks up the two.

  • http://zackallen.me Zack Allen

    TBotB ftw!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=516524954 Jacqui Norman

    I love this… I have never really understood why so many new Christians are advised to read John first, it can seem so complicated for the uninitiated! I have always advised people to start with Luke/Acts. There is a warmth and continuity, Jesus is revealed powerfully and yet without having passages that are so  difficult to understand.

    • Brad

      I believe that John is often recommended to new believers because it is the shortest of the gospels and it immediately “feeds” into Acts.  Maybe it’s a little like that “quick start” guide that comes with your new printer or digital camera.


CLOSE | X

HIDE | X