Darrell L. Bock on the Unity of Luke and Acts

Darrell Bock talks about the relationship between Luke and Acts. Thoughts?

"You also might find these seldom spoke of end-time prophecies interesting.https://www.youtube.com/wat..."

Why the Rapture isn’t Biblical… And ..."
"Can God's character change? That is the overriding question. If it can, none of us ..."

Greg Boyd Gives 5 Bullet Points ..."
"God helps those who lean on Him. :)(Isaiah 41:9, 10) You, whom I*(*Jehovah God*)* took ..."

Jesus Never Said: “God helps those ..."
"Speaking of theological novelties from the mid 19th century, anyone want to discuss young earth ..."

Why rapture predictors are always wrong ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Chuck McKnight

    I agree. Luke and Acts are almost certainly two halves of a whole. It is a shame that the traditional book order for the New Testament breaks up the two.

    • http://hippieheretic.com/ Chuck McKnight

      Just for you, Kurt. 😉

      And look, I found an old comment of mine on your blog that I still agree with!

      • http://KurtWillems.com Kurt Willems

        And there you go… making my day! haha

  • http://zackallen.me Zack Allen

    TBotB ftw!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=516524954 Jacqui Norman

    I love this… I have never really understood why so many new Christians are advised to read John first, it can seem so complicated for the uninitiated! I have always advised people to start with Luke/Acts. There is a warmth and continuity, Jesus is revealed powerfully and yet without having passages that are so  difficult to understand.

    • Brad

      I believe that John is often recommended to new believers because it is the shortest of the gospels and it immediately “feeds” into Acts.  Maybe it’s a little like that “quick start” guide that comes with your new printer or digital camera.