<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Pangea Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patheos.com/blogs/thepangeablog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/thepangeablog</link>
	<description>Kurt Willems&#039; Blog at Patheos</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 06:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on N.T. Wright &amp; Pete Enns Agree: Adam is Israel in Exile! by Kurt Willems</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/thepangeablog/2012/02/03/n-t-wright-pete-enns-agree-adam-is-israel-in-exile/#comment-7904</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt Willems</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 06:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patheos.com/blogs/thepangeablog/?p=4430#comment-7904</guid>
		<description>@8e2489e8e6d41f2f43624c99aa8ca30e:disqus ... your distinction is almost right, but not quite.  Pete views the Adam story as the older of the two creation stories... predating the exilic period.  It functioned as a &quot;wisdom&quot; story, and in its final form as an &quot;Israel&quot; / exile story.  I wonder if you read the review I wrote for his book the &quot;Evolution of Adam&quot; yesterday.  This video was connected to that particular post.  The article you list in your comment only scratches the surface of Pete&#039;s view as it is laid out in the book.  Here&#039;s the review and consider reading the book.  Its really quite excellent.  http://www.patheos.com/blogs/thepangeablog/2012/02/02/evolving-with-enns-reflections-on-the-evolution-of-adam/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@8e2489e8e6d41f2f43624c99aa8ca30e:disqus &#8230; your distinction is almost right, but not quite.  Pete views the Adam story as the older of the two creation stories&#8230; predating the exilic period.  It functioned as a &#8220;wisdom&#8221; story, and in its final form as an &#8220;Israel&#8221; / exile story.  I wonder if you read the review I wrote for his book the &#8220;Evolution of Adam&#8221; yesterday.  This video was connected to that particular post.  The article you list in your comment only scratches the surface of Pete&#8217;s view as it is laid out in the book.  Here&#8217;s the review and consider reading the book.  Its really quite excellent.  <a href="http://www.patheos.com/blogs/thepangeablog/2012/02/02/evolving-with-enns-reflections-on-the-evolution-of-adam/" rel="nofollow">http://www.patheos.com/blogs/thepangeablog/2012/02/02/evolving-with-enns-reflections-on-the-evolution-of-adam/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on N.T. Wright &amp; Pete Enns Agree: Adam is Israel in Exile! by jacobz</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/thepangeablog/2012/02/03/n-t-wright-pete-enns-agree-adam-is-israel-in-exile/#comment-7903</link>
		<dc:creator>jacobz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 02:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patheos.com/blogs/thepangeablog/?p=4430#comment-7903</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s important to note that Enns&#039; point is that Israel came first and Adam was written later to incorporate what they knew to be true about themselves as primordial history. Adam is a posthoc story about the nation&#039;s history, not humanity in general.
So then Israel is Adam, NOT Adam is Israel.
Did you see this?  http://biologos.org/blog/adam-is-israel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s important to note that Enns&#8217; point is that Israel came first and Adam was written later to incorporate what they knew to be true about themselves as primordial history. Adam is a posthoc story about the nation&#8217;s history, not humanity in general.<br />
So then Israel is Adam, NOT Adam is Israel.<br />
Did you see this?  <a href="http://biologos.org/blog/adam-is-israel" rel="nofollow">http://biologos.org/blog/adam-is-israel</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Evolving With Enns: Reflections on &#8220;The Evolution of Adam&#8221; by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/thepangeablog/2012/02/02/evolving-with-enns-reflections-on-the-evolution-of-adam/#comment-7902</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 00:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patheos.com/blogs/thepangeablog/?p=4423#comment-7902</guid>
		<description>Adam and Eve?  Challenge yourself.  Google First Scandal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam and Eve?  Challenge yourself.  Google First Scandal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Darrell L. Bock on the Unity of Luke and Acts by Zack Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/thepangeablog/2012/02/03/darrell-l-bock-on-the-unity-of-luke-and-acts/#comment-7901</link>
		<dc:creator>Zack Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patheos.com/blogs/thepangeablog/?p=4436#comment-7901</guid>
		<description>TBotB ftw!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TBotB ftw!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Evolving With Enns: Reflections on &#8220;The Evolution of Adam&#8221; by Brad Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/thepangeablog/2012/02/02/evolving-with-enns-reflections-on-the-evolution-of-adam/#comment-7900</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 21:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patheos.com/blogs/thepangeablog/?p=4423#comment-7900</guid>
		<description>I like this. I&#039;m slightly more conservative then Enns, I think, when it comes to dating certain portions of the OT (which is simply to say that I think more of the Torah can be considered older than many scholars would accept), and I don&#039;t locate quite as much in the exile as he would. I also was taught a covenantal understanding of Gen 1 - entities on the first three days were put under the &quot;rule&quot; of entities on the second three days, all of whom were put under the rule of God on the Sabbath. This provided Israelites a covenantal logic to creation, etc., tying what Yahweh was doing in their midst to Yahweh&#039;s cosmic acts of creation. I learned this from a fabulous teacher with a PhD from Harvard (in the 1990s), but I know many scholars would disagree with her.

Of course, all this is also why I&#039;m in theology and not biblical studies proper...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this. I&#8217;m slightly more conservative then Enns, I think, when it comes to dating certain portions of the OT (which is simply to say that I think more of the Torah can be considered older than many scholars would accept), and I don&#8217;t locate quite as much in the exile as he would. I also was taught a covenantal understanding of Gen 1 &#8211; entities on the first three days were put under the &#8220;rule&#8221; of entities on the second three days, all of whom were put under the rule of God on the Sabbath. This provided Israelites a covenantal logic to creation, etc., tying what Yahweh was doing in their midst to Yahweh&#8217;s cosmic acts of creation. I learned this from a fabulous teacher with a PhD from Harvard (in the 1990s), but I know many scholars would disagree with her.</p>
<p>Of course, all this is also why I&#8217;m in theology and not biblical studies proper&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on For the Love of Mumford: Learning about Love and Forgiveness by Kellen Freeman</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/thepangeablog/2012/02/02/for-the-love-of-mumford-learning-about-love-and-forgiveness/#comment-7899</link>
		<dc:creator>Kellen Freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patheos.com/blogs/thepangeablog/?p=4419#comment-7899</guid>
		<description>I found out about Mumford and Sons through thesixtyone.com. Awake My Soul was the first song I heard of theirs and I jumped at the chance to get the album. It&#039;s a fantastic example of story telling and a real sense of emotion that I think is lacking in a lot of music today both Christian and secular. One of my favorite albums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found out about Mumford and Sons through thesixtyone.com. Awake My Soul was the first song I heard of theirs and I jumped at the chance to get the album. It&#8217;s a fantastic example of story telling and a real sense of emotion that I think is lacking in a lot of music today both Christian and secular. One of my favorite albums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on C.S. Lewis Should Be An Evangelical Reject Too! (John Janzen) by Helen</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/thepangeablog/2011/07/18/c-s-lewis-should-be-an-evangelical-reject-too-john-janzen/#comment-7898</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patheos.com/blogs/thepangeablog/?p=3163#comment-7898</guid>
		<description>I think that anyone who thinks things through for themselves will never fit neatly into a category unless it&#039;s one they&#039;ve invented themselves. And possibly not even then! Not just in the field of religion, but politics, music and any other time there are several schools of thought or styles. 

Why should &#039;conservation&#039; of nature and natural resources be seen as a left issue and opposed by &#039;conservatives&#039;? How did they end up on opposite sides of the fence? Likewise how much sense does it make for abolishing abortion but supporting the death penalty, or abolishing the death penalty but supporting rights to choose abortion, to end up as part of the same package of beliefs?My intention is not to spark debate about these issues in particular, just to point out that sometimes beliefs get packaged together that shouldn&#039;t necessarily have to be taken  wholesale. As a skilled user may choose &#039;custom&#039; settings when with installing new software on a computer which make more sense for them, a skilled thinker (or at least someone thinking through their beliefs themselves) does not have to adopt the default beliefs of a group of people, although they may hold many in common with that group.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that anyone who thinks things through for themselves will never fit neatly into a category unless it&#8217;s one they&#8217;ve invented themselves. And possibly not even then! Not just in the field of religion, but politics, music and any other time there are several schools of thought or styles. </p>
<p>Why should &#8216;conservation&#8217; of nature and natural resources be seen as a left issue and opposed by &#8216;conservatives&#8217;? How did they end up on opposite sides of the fence? Likewise how much sense does it make for abolishing abortion but supporting the death penalty, or abolishing the death penalty but supporting rights to choose abortion, to end up as part of the same package of beliefs?My intention is not to spark debate about these issues in particular, just to point out that sometimes beliefs get packaged together that shouldn&#8217;t necessarily have to be taken  wholesale. As a skilled user may choose &#8216;custom&#8217; settings when with installing new software on a computer which make more sense for them, a skilled thinker (or at least someone thinking through their beliefs themselves) does not have to adopt the default beliefs of a group of people, although they may hold many in common with that group.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Preaching Against Evolution in Evangelical Churches Creates Atheists by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/thepangeablog/2012/01/12/preaching-against-evolution-in-evangelical-churches-creates-atheists/#comment-7897</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patheos.com/blogs/thepangeablog/?p=4288#comment-7897</guid>
		<description> Oh, and the cumulative effect of pretending that belief and science can co-exist peacefully? A &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/budding-scientist/2012/02/01/u-s-state-science-standards-are-mediocre-to-awful/?fullpage&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;national disgrace&lt;/a&gt; in science standards. Thank goodness we can fill the university science programs with Indians and Chinese who actually &lt;i&gt;know&lt;/i&gt; science. 

My question is, why are you okay with the US becoming a second rate country in education? Is your respecting religious belief worth it to the generations to follow? I don&#039;t think so. I think you&#039;re failing your in your civic duty.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Oh, and the cumulative effect of pretending that belief and science can co-exist peacefully? A <a href="http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/budding-scientist/2012/02/01/u-s-state-science-standards-are-mediocre-to-awful/?fullpage" rel="nofollow">national disgrace</a> in science standards. Thank goodness we can fill the university science programs with Indians and Chinese who actually <i>know</i> science. </p>
<p>My question is, why are you okay with the US becoming a second rate country in education? Is your respecting religious belief worth it to the generations to follow? I don&#8217;t think so. I think you&#8217;re failing your in your civic duty. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on N.T. Wright &amp; Pete Enns Agree: Adam is Israel in Exile! by James</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/thepangeablog/2012/02/03/n-t-wright-pete-enns-agree-adam-is-israel-in-exile/#comment-7896</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patheos.com/blogs/thepangeablog/?p=4430#comment-7896</guid>
		<description>I agree with this idea.  I was first introduced to it in book, &quot;The Evangelical Universalist&quot;, by Gregory McDonald, which uses the idea of Adam as Israel in Exile as a major building block for his thesis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with this idea.  I was first introduced to it in book, &#8220;The Evangelical Universalist&#8221;, by Gregory McDonald, which uses the idea of Adam as Israel in Exile as a major building block for his thesis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Darrell L. Bock on the Unity of Luke and Acts by Chuck McKnight</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/thepangeablog/2012/02/03/darrell-l-bock-on-the-unity-of-luke-and-acts/#comment-7895</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck McKnight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.patheos.com/blogs/thepangeablog/?p=4436#comment-7895</guid>
		<description>I agree. Luke and Acts are almost certainly two halves of a whole. It is a shame that the traditional book order for the New Testament breaks up the two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. Luke and Acts are almost certainly two halves of a whole. It is a shame that the traditional book order for the New Testament breaks up the two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 390/435 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.patheos.com @ 2012-02-04 08:58:07 -->
