Who was Robbed and Who was Right in Oscar Nominations

Now that Katniss Everdeen, um, I mean Jennifer Lawrence, has announced the nominations for this year’s Oscars, we can all second-guess The Academy of Motion Pictures. Who got robbed? (The Muppets! Andy Serkis!) Who got the recognition they deserved? (The Tree of Life! Meryl Streep!) And who shouldn’t be on a list of the nine Best Pictures of the year even if they were the only picture made that year? (I’m looking at you, Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close!)

 

Moi was robbed, Kermie!

Here are my reactions:

Best Animated Film


The Adventures of Tintin
A Cat in Paris
Chico & Rita
Kung Fu Panda 2

Puss in Boots
Rango

The news in this category is that, unlike last year when Toy Story 3 deservedly made it to the Best Picture category, the contenders this year were kind of blah. Kung Fu Panda is OK, I guess, and Puss in Boots is workable, but none of them reaches the transcendence of aToy Story 3. Rango is likely to win, but is my least favorite. 

The Academy should consider a category tweak. The Muppets was better than all these movies I’ve seen and would win against them for sure. But it has no home, no category in which to be nominated. Poor, poor Muppets. They should write a song about that.

Best Supporting Actress

Bérénice Bejo, The Artist
Jessica Chastain, The Help
Melissa McCarthy, Bridesmaids
Janet McTeer, Albert Nobbs
Octavia Spencer, The Help
I’m glad to see Melissa McCarthy nominated for her fresh, hilarious role in Bridesmaids. Funny, fresh movie and funny, fresh actress. 

Octavia Spencer definitely deserves a nod for The Help, but I would have picked Amy Ryan for Win Win and Shailene Woodley for The Descendants. Carey Mulligan in Drive was also fantastic.

Best Supporting Actor


Kenneth Branagh, My Week With Marilyn
Jonah Hill, Moneyball
Nick Nolte, Warrior
Christopher Plummer, Beginners
Max Von Sydow, Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close
So glad to see Nick Nolte nominated for Warrior. His emotional but understated depiction of a lifelong alcoholic trying to remain sober and atone for his misdeeds was excellent. Who knew he had it in him? Would love to see him win. 

I would have liked to see John Boyega for Attack the Block. He did a tremendous job as a thug in training who finds his calling and nobility in fighting aliens. Really. Watch it.

While I love Max Von Sydow, Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close is just an overdone movie and doesn’t measure up to being nominated.

The biggest scandal, however, is the absence of Andy Serkis for his motion capture acting as Caesar in Rise of the Planet of the Apes. He played an intelligent ape. Not a human shaped like an ape, but an actual thinking ape. That he did it in front of a green screen with little nobby things glued all over his body…even more amazing.

Best Actress


Glenn Close, Albert Nobbs
Viola Davis, The Help
Rooney Mara, The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo
Meryl Streep, The Iron Lady
Michelle Williams, My Week With Marilyn
This is about right, I suppose, although I’d probably trade Glenn Close for Charlize Theron in Young Adult. (I’d probably trade Glenn Close for just about anyone. She rubs me the wrong way.)

Best Actor


Demián Bichir, A Better Life
George Clooney, The Descendants
Jean Dujardin, The Artist
Gary Oldman, Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy
Brad Pitt, Moneyball
I would have liked to have seen Ryan Gosling for Drive, Paul Giamatti for Win Win and Brad Pitt for  The Tree of Life instead of Moneyball. The studio campaigned for him for Moneyball, and he is excellent in it, but he is transcendent in The Tree of Life

To make room for them, I’d take out the favorite, George Clooney, and Gary Oldman.

Best Director


Michel Hazanavicius, The Artist
Alexander Payne, The Descendants
Martin Scorsese, Hugo
Woody Allen, Midnight in Paris
Terrence Malick, The Tree of Life
No doubt in my mind that Malick deserves this win. No doubt. 

All these movies are well directed, however, and I’d be happy to see any of them win. Disappointed, though, that Nicolas Winding Refn wasn’t nominated for Drive.

Best Picture


The Artist
The Descendants
Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close

The Help
Hugo
Midnight in Paris
Moneyball
The Tree of Life
War Horse
War Horse and Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close are not in the same universe as the other films. One is long and boring, the other actively annoying. 

Films that should have been included: Drive, Win Win, and Warrior. That would make a nice, even ten.

The Tree of Life should win, but won’t. It’s the best movie in several years, but extremely polarizing. In a perfect world, it would win. But in a perfect world, we wouldn’t need it.

HTML Tables

Rise of the Planet of the Apes

Bottom Line: This undervalued movie is one of the best of the year.

The Gist: When scientific experiments raise Caesar the ape to have human-level intelligence, he must figure out what it means to know one’s self and find the apes place in the world.

The Verdict: Absolutely watch it. Andy Serkis, as Caesar through motion capture imagery, does an astonishing acting job. The themes of what it means to be human and what freedom means are fantastic. It is an excellent picture.

Be Aware: Rated PG-13 for intense action, the film has little language and no sexuality. It is a great film to watch with your older kids and teens.

Rise of the Planet of the Apes

When a movie universe has been well-trod, as in the “Planet of the Apes” franchise spanning at least six movies and countless TV programs,  it’s hard to believe anything new will measure up to the glories that have come before. George Lucas learned this the hard way, with his Star Wars prequels, as have any number of comic book superhero reboots. That’s why the awkwardly titled “Rise of the Planet of the Apes” is such a fantastic movie. It respects and builds upon all that has come before even as it creates its own powerful presence.

In present day San Francisco, Will Rodman (James Franco) toils away in one of those shiny, hi-tech medical labs that are all the rage in movies. He studies brain regeneration and intelligence enhancement, injecting chimpanzees with his experimental drugs. For Will, the research is not merely academic. He is slowly losing his father, played with touching pathos by John Lithgow, to the confusion and frustration of Alzheimer’s disease.

When his efforts succeed and, at the same time, go terribly wrong, all that remains is a newborn chimp. Will smuggles it home and his father, in a burst of lucidity, dubs him Caesar after the play by Shakespeare. The baby grows and becomes part of the family, somewhere between beloved pet and adored child. As Will teaches him sign language, Caesar demonstrates abnormal intelligence and human level understanding.

However, Caesar’s very animal response to a threat to the family lands him in an ape house, a simian prison of small cells and mistreatment. There, like an animal Nelson Mandela or Aung San Suu Kyi, he realizes justice will only come when apes unite.

This is Caesar’s movie. The human actors perform well, but they are only backdrop to the animal coming into self-awareness and knowledge of the world. Andy Serkis, the most famous actor you’ve never seen, brings Caesar to life through motion capture technology. Serkis also played Gollum in “The Lord of the Rings” trilogy and Kong in 2005’s “King Kong,” but the technology has come a long way since then. It now captures near-human levels of emotion in Caesar’s eyes and the smallest nuance of despair or anger in his body language.

The role is almost all body language and Serkis pulls it off amazingly, even more so that he doesn’t anthropomorphise the chimp. Caesar hoots, fights, runs, swings, connects, laughs, and emotes like an ape, not a man in  a monkey suit. He is an ape who knows himself, but an ape nonetheless.

With a posse of other chimps, a few orang-utans, and a silverback gorilla thrown in for good measure, the simian army becomes a force to fear. The movie spares no effort on effects. The animals take on the San Francisco police and the Golden Gate Bridge with edge-of-the-seat excitement. It includes a few winks to other “Apes” films, including the best re-use of a famous line I’ve ever seen. The film is rated PG-13 for intense action. It has no sexuality or profanity. It is entirely appropriate for children and teens who can handle fast paced action.

But it is the quiet moments that give the movie its power. Early in the movie, Caesar asks Will through sign language where he came from. When Will drives him by the lab and answers his questions honestly, Caesar not only understands his mother’s death, but asks the most human of questions: What am I?

This self-knowing is one of the main things that separate man from the animals. Even a baby human will rub dirt from his face in a mirror, something animals never understand. They don’t recognize the image as being themselves. When Caesar comes into awareness of himself, he inherits all the glories and trials of mankind: thirst for freedom, quest for meaning, hunger for truth, a sense of right and wrong.

For this reason, the audience completely relates to Caesar as he takes us on a ride to discover what freedom and meaning he can find in the world in which he finds himself. I was completely caught up in the story. Judging from the gasps and applause from the audience, they were as well.

It all adds up to an excellent movie, one that deserves the moniker “epic.” It ranks in the top three of the year so far. July was all about Harry Potter and his wizards, the rest of the summer belongs to the apes.