Allergies

I have often used the line, “I am allergic to academic guild meetings.”  To that, I usually hear a response, “Yes, they’re horrible affairs.”  That’s because of two reasons, I think.  The first is that the brown-nosing at these events is noxious.  Almost everyone, it seems, is on the prowl for a job — especially those of us who are untenured.  The second reason is that the content delivered in the vast majority of sessions is regarding the most picayune of details in academia; the worst kind of hyper-specialization is on display at these meetings.

In theological circles, the annual American Academy of Religion meeting is the granddaddy, and it’s happening this coming weekend in San Diego (in conjunction with the Society of Biblical Literature (the meetings will be held in tandem for the last time, as the AAR feels that they no longer need the SBL)).  And I’m going.

Thanks to Paraclete Press, I’ll be on a 2 1/2 hour panel on the emergent church on Saturday morning. The other panelists are Diana Butler Bass and Scot McKnight, and the moderator is Keith Matthews of Azusa Pacific (late of Cedar Ridge Community Church).  I’m looking forward to the panel — Cleave recorded a similar panel last year and we podcasted it, and I hope to do the same thing this year.

Between the panel and other meetings, I’m booked from 7:15am until 10pm, then I fly home on Sunday, completing 10 straight weekends of travel.  I don’t think I’ve ever looked forward to Thanksgiving more.  I just hope my allergies settle down.

  • Annie Bullock

    hmm…I’ll be at the AAR. I like the AAR. Sure, lots of panels are…odd. But others are really fascinating.

    funny you’d say that about the AAR/SBL split because I’ve heard an unbelievable amount of vitriol from SBL folks regarding all that useless crap that goes on in the AAR. Maybe the AAR *can* do without that.

    I’m one of those people who falls somewhere between the two, so I’ve spent a lot of time and energy figuring out where I belong, what I’m going to do with myself and trying to comprehend the politics of the split. What continues to frustrate me is that there are no sessions appropriate to my work left in the AAR and yet, in SBL, I’m barely on the radar, a moderately interesting footnote to the New Testament and wait, I don’t explicitly link my work to the new testament, which would be why 3/4 of a the room got up and left immediately before my paper the last time I gave one.

    It’s ugly. Like a divorce. And the field, forgive me for saying it, is a ghastly mess.


CLOSE | X

HIDE | X