7 Quick Takes (3/9/12)

— 1 —

Hands down, the most delightful story I read this week was in the Science Tuesday section of the NYT.  As a child, actor Alan Alda asked a teacher what caused a flame and was confused by the answer “oxidation.”

The old question about the flame came back when the journal Science asked Mr. Alda to write an editorial about communicating science. His article began with the anecdote.

Then he thought, why not also create a contest where anyone — including scientists — could offer an explanation of a flame, and recruit 11-year-olds to judge which one is the best?

That is what he and Stony Brook did, setting up a Web site, http://flamechallenge.org, to collect entries, which can be video, graphics or just words.

Having the explanations judged by an 11 year old seems to be a particularly brilliant touch.  And this story is as good a reason as any to remind you that I keep a link to dy/dan, an excellent blog run by a math teacher in my sidebar.

— 2 —

My general geekery means my “Get Excited and Make Things” t-shirt generally gets worn every single laundry cycle.  So I was interested in this quite short film that explains the origins of the original “Keep Calm and Carry On” design.

YouTube Preview Image

— 3 —

And speaking of made things to get excited about, I really enjoyed the explanation TYWKIWDBI found of how shot used to be made:

Shot towers harness the effects of surface tension on liquids in free-fall, a technique developed in 1782. Molten lead can be poured through a strainer at the top of a tower or shaft. The droplets become spherical as they fall and cool in this shape during their descent. The pellets are caught in a water basin to break their fall and finish cooling.

In 1830 a businessman from Green Bay, Wisconsin named Daniel Whitney was traveling along the Wisconsin River and recognized a sharp bluff near the town of Helena as a promising location for a shot tower. Lead deposits had recently been discovered in several locations around Iowa County. From the top of the bluff there was a 60-foot (18 m) sheer drop, below which the sandstone cliff sloped down to the riverbank, 180 feet (55 m) below the clifftop.

— 4 —

I abjure the new Lorax movie and reject it in all it’s forms, but I’ll admit there was one positive knock-on effect.  Apparently, people have been tweeting Shakespearean plots in the style of Seuss (the tag is #SeussSpeare).  Noah Millman has listed some of the best.  Among my favorites:

“Peaseblossom and Mustardseed, bring me some brew!” said the Ass on the Grass to Thing One and Thing Two.

I will not kill him with a sword. I will not kill my Scottish lord. I will not stab him in the back. I do not want to, Lady Mac.

Would you, could you, while at prayer? Kill him! Kill him! He is there!

— 5 —

Speaking of updates on literary classics, I was intrigued by Michael Saler’s take on why Sherlock Holmes continues to fascinate:

The solution to the case is one that is neither impossible nor even improbable: Holmes made reason enchanting. In the modern age, reason is often seen to be the panacea for our ills, but it can also be the source of them. Rationality seems to “disenchant” the world, removing the elements of wonder, surprise, and purpose that allegedly characterized the “premodern” world. “The disenchantment of the world” was a much-discussed issue in the late nineteenth century, one that vexed Conan Doyle. His detective, however, re-enchanted modernity through the distinctive use of reason.

Unlike many contemporary scientists and logicians who disdained the imagination, Holmes brought reason and the imagination, logic and intuition, together in a new synthesis that he called “the scientific use of the imagination.” He made critical thinking into a romantic adventure. Through his discerning eye, every detail of modern life, from newspaper advertisements to the footsteps of a giant hound, became charged with meaning, possibility, and wonder.

 

— 6 —

And if you’re looking for an enchanting mystery, check out this NPR story about Scottish librarians trying to discover who was leaving intricate book sculptures on their shelves.   The story’s too good to excerpt, so I’ll just pull a description of one of the pieces:

Next came a movie theater, one of Edinburgh’s local art film houses. It got, out of nowhere, a book carved so that a bunch of warriors seemed to be leaping (or in some cases galloping) off a movie screen straight into a startled audience. One of the audience members, if you looked closely, was wearing a tiny photo of the face of mystery writer Ian Rankin. The mystery deepened.

— 7 —

Finally, just a reminder that you can vote once per day for the About.com Atheism Awards.  I’m one of five nominees for Best Atheist Blog.  More details here.

 

For more Quick Takes, visit Conversion Diary!

About Leah Libresco

Leah Anthony Libresco graduated from Yale in 2011. She works as a statistician for a school in Washington D.C. by day, and by night writes for Patheos about theology, philosophy, and math at www.patheos.com/blogs/unequallyyoked. She was received into the Catholic Church in November 2012."

  • deiseach

    “The solution to the case is one that is neither impossible nor even improbable: Holmes made reason enchanting.”

    I would humbly suggest one minor amendment to that: Watson made reason (in the person of Holmes) enchanting. Anyone who wishes to quibble, may I refer you to the “The Thinking Machine” stories of the splendidly named Jacques Futrelle, starring “the distinguished scientist and logician, Professor Augustus S. F. X. Van Dusen, Ph. D., LL. D., F. R. S., M. D., etc., etc., etc.”

    Here is reason unalloyed by any sympathetic flatmate or Boswell (Hutchinson Hatch, the reporter who writes up the adventures of Professor Dr. etc. isn’t even a colleague so much as an authorial plot device) and if you can point me to a more querulous, whey-faced, irritating know-it-all who deserves to be shoved off a waterfall, then I will thank you to keep such a prodigy to yourself. Without Watson, Holmes could have shrivelled up into a self-centred, conceited ball of unlikeableness; with Watson, he becomes more humane and more appealing.

    • http://thinkinggrounds.blogspot.com Christian H

      Good call.

  • http://knowledgehungry.wordpress.com Jeanne G.

    Great links, Leah! Very interesting.

  • http://thecornerwithaview.blogspot.com Julie Robison

    LOVE the #SuessSpeare! And the book art. Hooray for culture!

  • http://diapeepees.blogspot.com Diapeepees

    Wow, interesting blog…had to read your background story and figure out how you were connecting to Jen F. …maybe she’s shedding some light on the whole Christian thing…I read Simcha Fisher’s post yesterday, and I guess beauty might have to be where you find Catholicism…http://www.ncregister.com/blog/simcha-fisher/good-for-you-vs.-just-plain-good/
    Looks like you have a science mind, a literary one, too (Sherlock)…so look there for faith too. Thanks for those science links. Looking forward to reading on. And, I’ve been watching all the new Sherlock on Masterpiece. Take Care!

  • Pingback: Trackback

  • Pingback: Trackback


CLOSE | X

HIDE | X