Squee! GetReligion is coming to Patheos

get religion

Oh, you had better believe that I am capering.GetReligion is a blog run by religion journalists that calls out a lot of religion news stories for omissions, ignorance, and general sloppiness.  The articles they fisk don't usually err out of malice, but they can really skew the discussion of religion issues.  GetReligion's watchdogging is so good that my friends and I say, as a matter of course, "Is there a GetReligion post on this, yet?"There is only one expression of joy pure enough to s … [Read more...]

Q&A with Steve Dawson (Part 2)

Welcome to part two of my Q&A with Steve Dawson of the St. Paul Street Evangelization project.  You can read part one here.What are some of the most common questions/responses you get?It's really not the norm that we're getting people with really tough questions. We get apologetic questions, such as "Why do you worship Mary," or all these real Protestant issues. More often, if people are presenting a challenge to us, it's about a moral issue, or some sort of scandal.People bring u … [Read more...]

Q&A with Steve Dawson (Part 1)

A little while ago, I mentioned the St. Paul Street Evangelization project on the blog.  SPSE is trying put a Catholic presence in the public square that opens the door to dialogue.  They're currently doing a fundraiser on IndieGoGo.Since apologetics and arguments are basically catnip to me, I contacted Steve Dawson to ask some questions about the project.  I've divvied the Q&A up into two parts: the first is focused on a big picture view of the project, the second has more to do the sp … [Read more...]

Ending with a clinch, not a child [Sondheim]

This post is part of a symposium on Stephen Sondheim's Company.I really enjoyed Gilbert's post on the absence of children in a musical about marriage.  This isn't a problem unique to Company, but I think it's more noticable these because Company seems like it's intended to say more about marriage.In most romances, the catharsis comes with a clinch, not a child.  The couple run at each other in slow motion, the music swells, and the pair lock lips.  Sometimes the camera will swoop out, … [Read more...]

“Maybe we just weren’t meant to have children” [Sondheim]

I want to kick off the Sondheim Symposium this week with a guest post by Gilbert of The Last Conformer.  He originally wrote it as a comment on the original post, but I like starting off the conversation by discussing something omitted, plus I want to reply to it tomorrow.  I'm in italics, everything that follows is his.  Oh, and I'm to blame for the stealing the post title from a different musical, I couldn't let Eve Tushnet have all the fun.  Take it away, Gilbert!As an entry point … [Read more...]

I’m speaking in Maryland tomorrow

Just a quick housekeeping note.  If you're in the DC/Maryland area, I'm going to be chatting at an Ellicott City Theology on Tap tomorrow night.  You can find the logistical details at the facebook event page.I should note that this speaking engagement has already been a learning experience, as I've found out that, when asked for a title, I shouldn't say "I don't know.  I like puns and math."  Because now I think part of the discussion is going to have to be on epistemology and why I think "M … [Read more...]

“Didn’t you ever break on the floor?”

debate rostrum

This post is a follow-up to a reflection on how going to rationality camp made me really grateful for my college debate experience.  "Break on the floor" is, I'm pretty sure, part of the Yale Political Union vernacular, so a definition is probably in order.  Our debates operated by Robert's Rules of order, but our parliamentary debate style bears little resemblance to the gatling-gun style of debate you may be used to from high school and college.  In some forms of competitive debate, you can … [Read more...]


CLOSE | X

HIDE | X