I’m sure there’s a Democrat version, too…
(via)
Recent Comments
- kholdom0790: What a champ. I have admired this guy for years, but now it’s at... on Attenborough on The Almighty
- grumpygirl: Back in those days, there were the traditional but liberal... on Mr. Conservative on religion and politics
- grumpygirl: They’d be calling him a RINO. Back from the days when... on Mr. Conservative on religion and politics
- Josh Stewart: My favorite question to ask proponents of the freel defense:... on John Piper and Divine Command
- Ryan: I agree, and definitely a guard against our own dogmatic tendencies is... on Appealing to Scientific Values
- Ruthie: I’ve read about stuff like this before. 10 years ago there was a story about a... on Kidnapped for Christ
Funny $&#!@ From 9 Laughs
I'm one of the contributors to 9 Laughs:
Subscribe by Email
Archives
LOL.
Genius!
Ha!
Hilarious! Now let’s see the Democratic version!
There isn’t a D version. The Rs epically fail when it comes to a sense of humor and any sort of creativity.
Brilliant. I am agog thinking of the folks who voted for these lunatics.
Is there one supports slavery?
Actually, the main opponents of slavery in the US were Republican. Although the party platforms have remained more or less the same, what is considered “conservative” and what is considered “liberal” has flip-flopped at least once, I think more times, but I am relatively unfamiliar with US history.
(Slavery is “un-Christian”, but really it’s quite Christian but “un-19th-century-worldview”. Morality obviously changes independent of Holy Text and therefore can’t be its source.)
* Slavery is supposedly “un-Christian”…