From this perspective, religion is not innate, but rather a cultural development that we might call “cognitive-emotional cheesecake”. I adapt this metaphor from Steven Pinker’s claim that music is not innate, but rather amounts to “auditory cheesecake”. A preference for cheesecake is not innate, since cheesecake did not exist during the early stages of human development. But preferences for sugar and fat are innate, and cheesecake cleverly combines them in an appealing way. Similarly, I conjecture, religion is appealing because it combines the psychological needs for explanations and emotional reassurance.
Paul Thagard, Professor of Philosophy at the University of Waterloo.
There’s just something about the phrase “cognitive-emotional cheesecake” …
Yup.
I don’t like Cheesecake. That could explain a thing or two.
“Similarly, I conjecture, religion is appealing because it combines the psychological needs for explanations and emotional reassurance.”
Although I’m not sure this is 100% true (ie, a more complex explanation is needed), it is very well put in describing religion’s appeal. The comfort of believing that you are always loved and taken care of and that there is a “perfect life” waiting for you can be incredibly alluring.
The power of placebo! ^_^
(I love cheesecake, but have abstained for years for vanity reasons)
I agree entirely, although I think there are many people for whom that is pretty much an adequate explanation of their religious motives.
Funny, I used to love cheesecake and now I’m lactose intolerant.
Likewise, I used to be a pastor and now I’m religion intolerant.
The metaphor works on so many levels!