Conflicted About Religion

I’m pretty conflicted about religion. On the one hand, I’m a huge fan of abortion. I like performing them, getting them, watching them, you name it. Then again, I think Communion wafers are delicious.

Matt Tobey

Comments

  1. Melissa says:

    Are the wafers only delicious if they’ve been blessed?

  2. Roger says:

    Communion wafers are kinda tasty; but then again, my tastes do run towards the bland.

  3. Brian says:

    LMAO!

    I just recently started drinking red wine and the first time I took a sip, the first thing it reminded me of was communion. Unless my taste memory sucks, that blood tastes just like wine!

  4. Revyloution says:

    Has anyone ever heard an argument against abortion that wasn’t religiously based?

    I found a blog on the intertubes awhile back with a guy who claimed to be an atheist and anti-choice. I tried to nail him down on why he held the position, but he was really evasive. The blog is down now.

    The reason I ask has to do with the US constitution. If a law were ever passed conferring person hood upon a fetus, I think a good case could be made that it was a violation of the Establishment Clause. If the basis for claiming someone is a person is rooted in religion, then you can’t make that into codified law.

    • Elemenope says:

      Sure, there are non-theistic arguments against abortion; they generally center around making a philosophical argument about that status of a fetus as a person in which inheres some right to continue existing. Personally I find them unconvincing, but they certainly do exist and are argued for seriously.

      • Revyloution says:

        I should have qualified that with ‘convincing’ argument. I’ve heard people use the statistics of depression and guilt after abortion. I think that’s clearly a societal issue, not a biological issue. Hypothetically, if we treated abortion with the same social stigma as taking antibiotics for a bacterial infection, I doubt there would be many emotional issues following abortion. I think that all of the negative effects (other than the real trauma of the occasional botched abortion) would be non-existent.

        • elizabethdamaro says:

          well, yes, social stigma is a factor. There is a hell of a lot of wiring in the female brain to reproduce and to carry to term though, based on such stigmas… and actually, you’re dealing with chemistry and hormonal changes in the woman’s body regardless. any loss of a pregnancy comes with a side effect. The emotional side effects of abortion (while some argue are religious) are also based on the some of the same emotional struggles a female has if she isn’t wired with that maternal instinct so to speak.

          That being said, termination of a pregnancy can occur early enough that not too much of that would be relevant. Many women lose pregnancies and aren’t even aware of it. A lot of the impact goes to the knowledge and of course, timing.

          • beyonddeities says:

            Well yes, we are animals. But we’re overpopulated.

          • wintermute says:

            The emotional side effects of abortion (while some argue are religious) are also based on the some of the same emotional struggles a female has if she isn’t wired with that maternal instinct so to speak.

            In societies where there isn’t a massive political and social movement opposed to abortion, negative emotional effects following abortion are almost unheard of. Even in places like America, they are far less common than anti-abortion activists claim.

            The obvious (but not sole) interpretation is that such negative effects are overwhelmingly caused by social pressure.

            • LRA says:

              Exactly. Fundies love to play up the “sin” of a person and then offer them the Jesus pill to solve it. There are no scientific studies that conclusively show that the trauma experienced by a *SMALL* number of women is anything but religion induced guilt. Therefore, it is not actually the abortion that traumatized the women, but the reaction of people around them. Women free from such guilt are fine.

            • Elemenope says:

              I don’t think that well explains women’s testimony from cultures that do not have much religious social pressure re: Abortion.

            • LRA says:

              What women’s testimonies? Do you have a link?

            • LRA says:

              Perhaps you’re referring to the Chinese?

            • Elemenope says:

              They would be one example, though that is complicated in a different direction by state pressure.

            • Elemenope says:

              And I should hasten to add that the psychological effect, whatever it may be, clearly doesn’t rise to the level of “trauma” causative of PTSD or anything similar. That *is* pure propaganda, with no medical basis.

            • LRA says:

              Well, that is what I’m referring to. Some (politically motivated) doctors have tried to get post-abortion trauma to be a recognized disorder on the level of PTSD.

              So perhaps we are in “violent” agreement here. LOL!!!

    • elizabethdamaro says:

      “Has anyone ever heard an argument against abortion that wasn’t religiously based?”

      My argument against abortion is not based on theism at all. But, it also is not an argument against the law. However, I could certainly argue my position AND include the law as well.

      And it would have zero to do with theism, personhood, or whatnot.

      And it is solid.

  5. wazza says:

    if only Jesus had been able to work cheese into it somewhere…

  6. cranium says:

    Try spreading a bit of fetus on the wafer – extra yummy!

    The difference between communion wine and the wine you buy to drink is that the church has enough time to get a cat to balance on top of the bottle.

  7. Stupid Idea says:

    The church I went to used Hawaiian Bread. Mmmmm…. So tasty.

  8. elizabethdamaro says:

    Matzah is yummy.

  9. nazani14 says:

    A great Colbert moment.
    [raises hand] “-so help me, Jay and Silent Bob.”

  10. Janet Greene says:

    When I was a kid, we had one of the church women make tiny tea biscuits as communion wafers. They were DELICIOUS. After church, I would go to the back and help myself (I was always hungry after church – my dad was a pastor and would spend a long time talking to people, even though his family was hungry & it was lunchtime).

    Anyway, I felt so guilty because i knew I was eating jesus body, and enjoying it for the flavour and not for the spiritual aspect. (I must have been about 6 or 7 years old). I thought for sure I would go to hell for this. I finally fessed up to my dad, who kind of chuckled at my consternation. I was suprised by this, because he had repeatedly said that it was a serious sin not to take communion seriously.

  11. Janet Greene says:

    Oh, and I have never had the pleasure of watching an abortion so I am unable to comment on that.

Leave a Comment

*