A reasonable blog on atheism, religion, science and skepticism
Follow Patheos
Atheist:
Subscribe through RSS
Follow Patheos on
Faith Channels
Religion Library
Topics
Resources
Copyright 2008-2012, Patheos. All rights reserved. Terms of Service | Patheos Privacy Policy
The sad part is that this film give a more realistic description of the way science work then anything produced by the discovery institute.
Does the menagerie of birds include the European or African swallow? Because that makes a difference as to whether you drown the wizard, or if you have to consult the Legendary Black Beast of Aaaaarrrrrggggghhhhh.
Just sayin.
Numbers are the Supreme Court of science. However Godel proved that we may not prove everything. There are Physics Foibles!! There is a lot more to learn – keep thinking.
You just said like five unrelated and vague things in a row. Numbers aren’t really the “Supreme Court” of science; that would be observation. But numbers are definitely ubiquitous in its theories and models.
Gödel didn’t prove anything important to science, but he did prove that all systems of logic powerful enough to express basic arithmetic contained statements that were true but could not be proven true (and more specifically, that no consistent system could prove itself to be consistent).
I don’t know what a “Physics Foible” is.
And we definitely have a lot to learn, but if you are referring to “unprovable” things, well, we can’t really “learn” those, can we?
pst, you know how the argument works: Gödel proved that science cannot know everything ergo God exists.
Christian logic striking again.