I actually agree with what you’ve just said – And yet, according to you, the king of over-analysis, cartoon strips contain important information out-of-shot that the author is negligent for not including. Not very internally consistent, are you?
In other words, you were wrong on the last thread I wrote, you know damned well you were wrong, but you’re too small of a person to admit it. And now you’re a hypocrite too – I’m the troll looking to pick fights, and yet you’re the one who’s just called me a spittoon. I haven’t had to make any ad-hominem attacks like that on you, all I’ve had to do is point out where you’re being picky / over-analysing / inconsistent. That should tell you something.
Oh, and this is the second time you’ve said you’re not going to reply to me. I guess we can add “fickle” to your list of faults, eh?
No, hands up: I deleted his post. And I’m not apologising for that. It was a 300 word stream of personal insults directed at me with no actual content, discussion or contribution. I understand that you might disagree with my decision to do that, and you can condemn me for it if you feel that way, but I really felt like enough was enough with this guy. It was only going to develop further into even more of an eternal bitch-fest, and enough was enough.
Aw, shucks! I missed my chance to show off my erudition. As a matter of fact, I do happen to know the historical development of the words “gay” and “maggot” over the past four centuries.
I did read some of the comments concerning two bunnies and a jigsaw puzzle and all I could think was WTF it’s just making a point and only an idiot would analyse it any further than that … well would you believe it an idiot turned up.
LOL!!!
that made me laugh
Abstinence didn’t work either
Abstinence didn’t work as a form of birth control either
Fictional literary characters can’t ‘decide’ to *do* anything since they are constructs and not sentient beings.
An author can write a story about the character and have the character ‘do’ things, but the character itself can’t make decisions.
I actually agree with what you’ve just said – And yet, according to you, the king of over-analysis, cartoon strips contain important information out-of-shot that the author is negligent for not including. Not very internally consistent, are you?
Look, Cuspidor, you’re a troll, just looking to pick fights…I get that.
You insult people and provide no insight…because you have none to give.
You provide heat but no illumination.
Don’t reply to my posts if you can’t be civil and I’ll do likewise.
This is my last reply directly to you.
Truth hurts, doesn’t it?
I sure hope so!
In other words, you were wrong on the last thread I wrote, you know damned well you were wrong, but you’re too small of a person to admit it. And now you’re a hypocrite too – I’m the troll looking to pick fights, and yet you’re the one who’s just called me a spittoon. I haven’t had to make any ad-hominem attacks like that on you, all I’ve had to do is point out where you’re being picky / over-analysing / inconsistent. That should tell you something.
Oh, and this is the second time you’ve said you’re not going to reply to me. I guess we can add “fickle” to your list of faults, eh?
Do you really not see what you’re saying?
Sorry, after three solid days I’ve had enough immature ad-hominems and trolling. He’s going back under the bridge.
Unless you mean he tripped up the spam filter and you are tired of approving his comments.
If you are intentional blocking him, I’m inclined to think you are doing something wrong here.
No, hands up: I deleted his post. And I’m not apologising for that. It was a 300 word stream of personal insults directed at me with no actual content, discussion or contribution. I understand that you might disagree with my decision to do that, and you can condemn me for it if you feel that way, but I really felt like enough was enough with this guy. It was only going to develop further into even more of an eternal bitch-fest, and enough was enough.
Edit: Just to clarify, I haven’t blocked the guy.
Aw, shucks! I missed my chance to show off my erudition. As a matter of fact, I do happen to know the historical development of the words “gay” and “maggot” over the past four centuries.
Maggot?!
“Maggot”, yes. In other words, a mathom. A whimsical gift.
Researching the historical development of the word “gay” is left as an exercise for the reader.
That’s… deep. ;)
You know, jumping up and down screaming, “I’m so very smart, PAY ATTENTION TO ME!” is probably less dignified, but it would be functionally the same.
Is pedantry the new trolling? There seems to be a lot of it on the blog comments lately.
“Is pedantry the new trolling?”
I did read some of the comments concerning two bunnies and a jigsaw puzzle and all I could think was WTF it’s just making a point and only an idiot would analyse it any further than that … well would you believe it an idiot turned up.
I think you misspelled derp.
:)
If she didn’t we wouldn’t have some of the most wonderful music ever composed to listen to this time of the year.