Pope Blames Environmental Problems on Atheists

Pope MohawkThe Pope recently blamed atheists for the world’s environmental problems:

Is it not true that inconsiderate use of creation begins where God is marginalized or also where is existence is denied? If the human creature’s relationship with the Creator weakens, matter is reduced to egoistic possession, man becomes the “final authority,” and the objective of existence is reduced to a feverish race to possess the most possible.

Most of the people I’ve met who don’t care about the earth have been Christians. I’m sure my experience is biased, but I also haven’t met an atheist that isn’t concerned about our environment — though I’m sure there are some. Most Christians who don’t care about the environment do so on the basis that God has things under control and he’ll eventually torch the earth anyway. Atheists, on the other hand, believe this is the only home we have and we need to take care of it.

There are Christians who care about the environment, but that’s been a fairly recent bandwagon for them. The evangelical green movement has been gaining momentum, and I’m pleased with that.

But it’s just stupid to think that our environmental problems stem from atheism, when everyone knows it stems from denying the Flying Spaghetti Monster, bless His Holy Noodle.

(via)

The Not-So-Green Skies

“The U.S. airline industry discards enough aluminum cans every year to build nearly 58 Boeing 747s and enough paper to fill a football field–size hole 230 feet deep—that’s 4,250 tons of aluminum and 72,250 tons of paper. The 30 largest airports in the country, with the help of the airlines, create enough waste to equal the trash produced by cities the size of Miami or Minneapolis.”

Airlines & Recycling: The Not-So-Green Skies

How Did This Guy Get Elected?

Rep. John Shimkus, an IL representative, knows that global warming is a hoax because “God’s Word” says that God will be the one to destroy the earth, not man. There’s no need to worry about global flooding, because God promised he wouldn’t do that anymore:

The earth will end only when God declares it’s time to be over. Man will not destroy this earth. This earth will not be destroyed by a flood…. We can get into the theological discourse of that position, but I do believe God’s word is infallible, unchanging, perfect.

I find it disturbing someone who thinks like this is leading our country.

Here’s the video:

YouTube Preview Image

Clean Coal Clean

I thought this was pretty good:

YouTube Preview Image

It’s directed by the Coen Brothers.

But it's not natural!

Every advance in civilization has been denounced as unnatural while it was recent.

(Bertrand Russell, “An Outline of Intellectual Rubbish” (1943) in The Portable Atheist, p. 199)

I often laugh when I hear unnatural used synonymously for bad. What does natural even mean? That it comes about without our interference? But aren’t we part of nature? If we are, aren’t silicon and satellites just as natural as saliva and snapdragons?

Or if we’re not included in nature, then what business can we label domesticated vegetables, fruits, and animals as natural?

I also laugh when natural is used synonymously for good. Natural as in disease, disasters, dirt, death, and diarrhea?

Just because something is considered natural doesn’t mean it’s good, and just because it’s considered unnatural doesn’t mean it’s bad.

It used to be the counterculture that was confused about this, but now it has seeped into consumer culture. Thus almost every bag of food now says “all natural ingredients,” which means nothing.