Rick Santorum weighs in on a historical debate:
Rick Santorum launched into a scathing attack on the left, charging during an appearance in South Carolina that the history of the Crusades has been corrupted by “the American left who hates Christendom.”
“The idea that the Crusades and the fight of Christendom against Islam is somehow an aggression on our part is absolutely anti-historical,” Santorum said in Spartanburg on Tuesday. “And that is what the perception is by the American left who hates Christendom.”
Other folks can deal with the politics, I’m more interested in the history.
I think Santorum is about half right. I’m not a big fan of the argument that the Latin crusaders were only in it to grab loot and land, nor am I going to argue that they were motivated by a drive to exterminate Islam. There was a bit of each of these, but not enough to explain the sudden appearance of the Crusades.
But you also can’t ignore the fact that the Franks (to use the catch-all term used by the Muslims) did pack up and go down to the Holy Land, at tremendous expense. The idea that Rome was suddenly responding to the Muslim conquest of Jerusalem 400 years before just doesn’t hold water. And while the Seljuk Turks were putting pressure on Byzantium, that looks like one more battle in a long struggle between competing powers.
The Seljuks didn’t pose a major threat to the west, so it wasn’t a defensive war. Nor would it explain their headlong rush to Jerusalem, which at the time was in the hands of the Egyptian Fatimid rulers, the enemies of the Seljuks. Islam was probably more fragmented at this time than ever before (which explains why the First Crusade was so successful.)
Pope Urban II did play many of these cards when he ignited the First Crusade, but he was doing so for his own political reasons. He was looking to increase his own influence, and by creating a kind of holy war he succeeded. The knights who marched off were seeking a new type of armed pilgrimage by which to ease the burden of their sin.
In the end, it has to be seen as a type of religious aggression, just not a straightforward kind.
The Busybody has a good Top Ten list of recent works on the Crusades. I highly recommend Thomas Asbridge. I hear good things about Christopher Tyerman, but I found God’s War to be impenetrable.






Follow Patheos
Atheist: