<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Unreasonable Faith&#187; Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unreasonablefaith/category/links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unreasonablefaith</link>
	<description>A reasonable blog on atheism, religion, science and skepticism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 09:00:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Million Dollar Horse? Say It Ain&#039;t So!</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unreasonablefaith/2010/07/million-dollar-horse-say-it-aint-so/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unreasonablefaith/2010/07/million-dollar-horse-say-it-aint-so/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 23:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>edman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conspiracy Theories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oh the Stupidity!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=12239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While perhaps not quite as insane as TimeCube, the Million Dollar Horse website has developed its own special brand of crazy. (or, maybe, it&#8217;s just a clever Poe&#8230;) I wonder though, what&#8217;s their deal with Jews? Do crazy conspiracy nuts tend toward antisemitism as a default? If so, what does that mean for Jewish conspiracy nuts?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While perhaps not quite as insane as <a href="http://www.timecube.com/">TimeCube</a>, the <a href="http://www.milliondollarhorse.com/">Million Dollar Horse</a> website has developed its own special brand of crazy. (or, maybe, it&#8217;s just a clever Poe&#8230;)</p>
<p>I wonder though, what&#8217;s their deal with Jews? Do crazy conspiracy nuts tend toward antisemitism as a default? If so, what does that mean for Jewish conspiracy nuts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unreasonablefaith/2010/07/million-dollar-horse-say-it-aint-so/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Makeup Misconception</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unreasonablefaith/2010/06/the-makeup-misconception/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unreasonablefaith/2010/06/the-makeup-misconception/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 15:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Florien</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=11746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Misconception: Makeup is used by women to reduce the appearance of blemishes and aging. The Truth: Makeup enhances the contrast of the human face, allowing for faster recognition of gender. Read more at You Are Not So Smart, one of my new favorite blogs.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Misconception: </strong>Makeup is used by women to reduce the appearance of blemishes and aging.</p>
<p><strong>The Truth:</strong> Makeup enhances the contrast of the human face, allowing for faster recognition of gender.</p>
<p><a href="http://youarenotsosmart.com/2010/06/11/makeup/">Read more</a> at <a href="http://youarenotsosmart.com/">You Are Not So Smart</a>, one of my new favorite blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unreasonablefaith/2010/06/the-makeup-misconception/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Free Evolution Book Excerpts</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unreasonablefaith/2010/06/free-evolution-book-excerpts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unreasonablefaith/2010/06/free-evolution-book-excerpts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 15:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Florien</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Creationism / ID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=11716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NCSE has put up a number of evolution book excerpts on their website: Charles Darwin&#8217;s On the Origin Of Species: A Graphic Adaptation by Michael Keller The Tangled Bank by Carl Zimmer Evolution, Second Edition By Douglas J. Futuyma Evidence of Evolution by Susan Middleton and Mary Ellen Hannibal Evolution: The story of life [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NCSE has put up a number of evolution book excerpts on their website:</p>
<p><a href="http://ncse.com/files/pub/evolution/Illustrated Origin--Darwin--small--credit.pdf">Charles Darwin&#8217;s On the Origin Of Species: A Graphic Adaptation</a><br />
by Michael Keller</p>
<p><a href="http://ncse.com/files/pub/evolution/Zimmer--Tangled Bank--chapter 10--with notice---FB.pdf">The Tangled Bank</a><br />
by Carl Zimmer</p>
<p><a href="http://ncse.com/files/pub/evolution/Evolution--Futuyma--chap11--fb.pdf">Evolution, Second Edition</a><br />
By Douglas J. Futuyma</p>
<p><a href="http://ncse.com/files/pub/evolution/Evidence_combined--fb.pdf">Evidence of Evolution</a><br />
by Susan Middleton and Mary Ellen Hannibal</p>
<p><a href="http://ncse.com/files/pub/evolution/Evolution--StoryofLife--fb.pdf">Evolution: The story of life</a><br />
by Douglas Palmer</p>
<p><a href="http://ncse.com/files/pub/evolution/Evolution--KidsCanPress--FB.pdf">Evolution: How We and All Living Things Came to Be</a><br />
by Daniel Loxton</p>
<p><a href="http://ncse.com/files/pub/evolution/Excerpt--formatted--footnotes--FB.pdf">Rapture Ready!</a><br />
by Daniel Radosh</p>
<p><a href="http://bit.ly/bmtqJd">Evolution vs. Creationism, 2nd edition</a><br />
by Eugenie C. Scott</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unreasonablefaith/2010/06/free-evolution-book-excerpts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are Killer Whales Splitting Into Two Species?</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unreasonablefaith/2010/01/are-killer-whales-splitting-into-two-species/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unreasonablefaith/2010/01/are-killer-whales-splitting-into-two-species/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Florien</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=8944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are killer whales splitting into two species? It looks like it: Scientists have revealed that there is not one but two types of killer whale living in UK waters. Each differs in its appearance and diet, with males of one type being almost two metres longer than the other. The killer whales could be at an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are killer whales splitting into two species? <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/earth/hi/earth_news/newsid_8440000/8440002.stm">It looks like it</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Scientists have revealed that there is not one but two types of killer whale living in UK waters. Each differs in its appearance and diet, with males of one type being almost two metres longer than the other.</p>
<p>The killer whales could be at an early stage of becoming two separate species, the researchers say. The international group of scientists has published its results in the journal Molecular Ecology.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s exciting to think about two very different types of killer whale in the waters around Britain,&#8221; says Dr Andy Foote from the University of Aberdeen, UK, who undertook the study.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unreasonablefaith/2010/01/are-killer-whales-splitting-into-two-species/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stereotyping People By Their Favorite Author</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unreasonablefaith/2009/12/stereotyping-people-by-their-favorite-author/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unreasonablefaith/2009/12/stereotyping-people-by-their-favorite-author/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Florien</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=8741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lauren Leto (creator and co-founder of the popular Texts From Last Night) wrote a hilarious post on stereotyping people by their favorite author. Here are some of my favorites: J.D. Salinger Kids who don’t fit in (duh). Stephenie Meyer People who type like this: OMG. Mah fAvvv &#60;3 &#60;3. Lauren Weisberger Girls who can’t read. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lauren Leto (creator and co-founder of the popular <a href="http://textsfromlastnight.com/">Texts From Last Night</a>) wrote a hilarious post on <a href="http://laurenleto.wordpress.com/readers-by-author/">stereotyping people by their favorite author</a>. Here are some of my favorites:</p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-weight: bold">J.D. Salinger</span></p>
<p>Kids who don’t fit in (duh).</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold">Stephenie Meyer</span></p>
<p>People who type like this: OMG. Mah fAvvv &lt;3 &lt;3.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold">Lauren Weisberger</span></p>
<p>Girls who can’t read. Or think.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold">Christopher Hitchens</span></p>
<p>People I would love to hang out with.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold">Leo Tolstoy</span></p>
<p>Guys I want to date.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold">Fyodor Dostoevsky</span></p>
<p>Guys I want to sleep with. (The difference between the two Russian authors lies in the fact that I think the Underground Man is sexier than Pierre Buzukhov).</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold">Ayn Rand</span></p>
<p>Workaholics seeking validation.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold">Jane Austen (or Bronte Sisters)</span></p>
<p>Girls who made out with other girls in college when they were going through a “phase”.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold">Charles Dickens</span></p>
<p>Ninth graders who think they’re going to be authors someday but end up in marketing.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold">William Shakespeare</span></p>
<p>People who like bondage.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold">Mark Twain</span></p>
<p>Liars.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold">Thomas Aquinas</span></p>
<p>Premature ejaculators.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold">H.P. Lovecraft</span><span style="font-style: italic"> </span></p>
<p>People who can quote the Comic Book Guy from Simpsons.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold">C.S. Lewis</span></p>
<p>Youth group leaders who picked their nose in the 4th grade.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold">Gabriel Garcia Marquez</span></p>
<p>Men who can’t lie but will instead be silent if they know you don’t want to hear the truth.</p>
<p><strong>Richard Dawkins</strong></p>
<p>People who have their significant other grab them under the table in order to shut them up whenever someone else at a dinner says something absolutely ridiculous and wrong.</p></blockquote>
<p>She missed an obvious one, though — people who say their favorite author is <em>God&#8230;</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unreasonablefaith/2009/12/stereotyping-people-by-their-favorite-author/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>At the Hour of Our Death</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unreasonablefaith/2009/12/at-the-hour-of-our-death/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unreasonablefaith/2009/12/at-the-hour-of-our-death/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Florien</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=8520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s been quite a bit of discussion going on about near death experiences (NDEs), so here&#8217;s another article to add into the mix. &#8220;At the Hour Of Our Death&#8221; talks about some of the research going on with NDEs. My question is: how do people know if NDE&#8217;s actually occurred at the time the brain was shut [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s been <a href="http://unreasonablefaith.com/2009/12/03/dsouza-says-he-can-prove-live-after-death/">quite a bit of discussion</a> going on about near death experiences (NDEs), so here&#8217;s another article to add into the mix. &#8220;<a href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1657919,00.html">At the Hour Of Our Death</a>&#8221; talks about some of the research going on with NDEs.</p>
<p>My question is: how do people know if NDE&#8217;s actually occurred at the time the brain was shut down? Couldn&#8217;t it have happened right before or after? In those few seconds the entire NDE could have happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unreasonablefaith/2009/12/at-the-hour-of-our-death/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beyond Belief Videos</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unreasonablefaith/2009/11/beyond-belief-videos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unreasonablefaith/2009/11/beyond-belief-videos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Florien</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=8350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Science Network has a ton of videos available from speakers like Sam Harris, Michael Shermer, Lawrence Krauss, Neil deGrasse Tyson, and more from the &#8220;Beyond Belief&#8221; conferences: Beyond Belief: Science, Reason, Religion &#38; Survival (2006) Beyond Belief: Enlightenment 2.0 (2007) Beyond Belief: Candles in the Dark (2008) Lots of good stuff in there, be sure to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://thesciencenetwork.org/">The Science Network</a> has a ton of videos available from speakers like Sam Harris, Michael Shermer, Lawrence Krauss, Neil deGrasse Tyson, and more from the &#8220;Beyond Belief&#8221; conferences:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://thesciencenetwork.org/programs/beyond-belief-science-religion-reason-and-survival">Beyond Belief: Science, Reason, Religion &amp; Survival</a> (2006)</li>
<li><a href="http://thesciencenetwork.org/programs/beyond-belief-enlightenment-2-0">Beyond Belief: Enlightenment 2.0</a> (2007)</li>
<li><a href="http://thesciencenetwork.org/programs/beyond-belief-candles-in-the-dark">Beyond Belief: Candles in the Dark</a> (2008)</li>
</ul>
<p>Lots of good stuff in there, be sure to check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unreasonablefaith/2009/11/beyond-belief-videos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 Steps to Eternity</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unreasonablefaith/2009/10/5-steps-to-eternity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unreasonablefaith/2009/10/5-steps-to-eternity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 09:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Florien</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=7328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may be interested in Harrison Saunders&#8217; essay &#8220;5 Steps to Eternity,&#8221; who believes &#8220;we may now be able to provide an entirely scientific and rational answer&#8221; to the question of why there is something rather than nothing: In the ongoing battle between science and religion, the forces of rationalism have been hampered by an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-2095" src="http://wp.patheos.com/blogs/unreasonablefaith/files/2009/01/space.jpg" alt="space" width="196" height="142" align="right" />You may be interested in Harrison Saunders&#8217; essay &#8220;<a href="http://www.earthletter.org/">5 Steps to Eternity</a>,&#8221; who believes &#8220;we may now be able to provide an entirely scientific and rational answer&#8221; to the question of why there is something rather than nothing:</p>
<blockquote><p>In the ongoing battle between science and religion, the forces of rationalism have been hampered by an 800-lb gorilla firmly planted in its corner. The question of why the universe exists <em>at all</em> has variously been called “the first of all questions” and the “Primordial Existential Question.” It has been phrased by both Leibniz and Heidegger as “Why is there something rather than nothing?” while Steven Hawking wonders, “Why does the Universe bother to exist?” Religion triumphantly proclaims the answer: because God the Prime Creator made it all. Unable to come up with a counter argument, Rationalists have just shrugged and meekly suggested that the answer may be outside the realm of science.</p>
<p>As long as theism provides the only solution, it will continue to dominate debate and sway the public mind on the question of “creation.” However, I believe we may now be able to provide an entirely scientific and rational answer to this most profound of questions. The article below exposes how the “God answer” falls short and provides a 5-step analysis of how an eternal universe – with no beginning or end – can be understood through application of contemporary science. This revelation describes a universe that “bothers to exist” on its own terms, effectively eliminating the need for God as Prime Creator.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unreasonablefaith/2009/10/5-steps-to-eternity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Future of our World</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unreasonablefaith/2009/09/the-future-of-our-world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unreasonablefaith/2009/09/the-future-of-our-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 12:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Florien</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=6962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[YTMND presents The Future of our World.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YTMND presents <a href="http://thefutureofourworld.ytmnd.com/">The Future of our World</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unreasonablefaith/2009/09/the-future-of-our-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;If you&#039;re not a Christian, you&#039;re going to die.&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unreasonablefaith/2009/03/if-youre-not-a-christian-youre-going-to-die/</link>
		<comments>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unreasonablefaith/2009/03/if-youre-not-a-christian-youre-going-to-die/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 16:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Florien</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fundamentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Persecution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unreasonablefaith.com/?p=2934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glad I didn&#8217;t work with this wacko, because I might be dead. A gunman came to work with a semiautomatic handgun to kill co-workers who were not Christians: A 24-year-old ski lift operator who fatally shot the general manager of the Eldora ski area was determined to kill co-workers who weren&#8217;t Christian, according to court [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad I didn&#8217;t work with this wacko, because I might be dead. A gunman came to work with a semiautomatic handgun to <a href="http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/18438582/detail.html#-">kill co-workers who were not Christians</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>A 24-year-old ski lift operator who fatally shot the general manager of the Eldora ski area was determined to kill co-workers who weren&#8217;t Christian, according to court records obtained Thursday.</p>
<p>The documents, filed Wednesday in Boulder District Court, said witnesses told authorities that Derik Bonestroo walked into a building at work, fired a gun into the ceiling and said: <strong>&#8220;If you&#8217;re not Christian, you&#8217;re going to die.&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>General manager Brian Mahon was shot and killed Dec. 30 at the ski area west of Nederland, Colo., in Boulder County.</p>
<p>Witnesses said when Bonestroo asked Mahon&#8217;s religion, Mahon said &#8220;Catholic&#8221; and Bonestroo shot him twice: in the chest and head.</p></blockquote>
<p>If I were there, I would have said I was a Christian. I have no problem lying to a madman to save my life. If he didn&#8217;t believe me, I&#8217;d have asked Jesus into my heart right there to prove it. And then if I had a chance, I would have tried to get his gun and shoot him before he hurt anyone else. Psychopath.</p>
<p>Of course, he&#8217;s not a <em>real</em> Christian. Just a poser. He didn&#8217;t <em>really</em> believe. Thought I&#8217;d anticipate that comment in advance.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not like God would ever want someone to do that. I mean, he didn&#8217;t ask Abraham to wrap up and kill his only son, did he? He never told his chosen people to massacre another nation and slaughter all their women, children and animals, right? God is love and would never ask a human being to hurt another!</p>
<p>(<a href="http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/18438582/detail.html#-">via</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unreasonablefaith/2009/03/if-youre-not-a-christian-youre-going-to-die/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>255</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/49 queries in 0.185 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 1862/1968 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.patheos.com @ 2012-05-25 11:21:56 -->
