Don’t do this at home.

Magic tricks are real, though… ;)
A reasonable blog on atheism, religion, science and skepticism
Don’t do this at home.

Magic tricks are real, though… ;)
From Derren Brown’s site:
With the cameras in hot pursuit, Derren faces his toughest project yet, going in search of an unsuspecting member of the British public prepared to adopt the guise of a pastor and miracle worker.
His chosen one then has six months to learn the trade and flourish across the pond as a convincing pastor.
The final phase of the volunteer’s extraordinary challenge sees them attempt to perform faith healing miracles live in Texas, but will Derren’s new recruit be accepted as a faith healer or cast away as fake healer?
(via Faith Palm)
As we get closer to Halloween, I’m seeing more of the usual evangelical hand-wringing about the “occult.” My problem is there seems to be multiple occults in this world.
The first is the one that’s been written about lightly by historians, but is nevertheless well documented. It’s full of secret societies – most derived from or influenced by Freemasonry. There are numerous occult religions – mostly derived from 19th century romantic notions of primitive religion. There’s magic of a sort, based on grimoires that have been passed down, rewritten and adapted for a thousand years.
The thing that strikes me about the occult is how normal and human it is. For all the mystic trappings of the fraternal secret societies, the basic motivation for joining seems to be getting away from the wife and getting drunk. The elaborate histories of the groups turn out to be tall tales used to impress new members. Many “nature religions” seem to be a product of that desire the affluent have for an elusive thing called “authenticity.” Magic is constantly changing because it doesn’t work, and the practitioners never accept that.
Then there’s the occult I keep reading about from Evangelicals.This second occult seems to have very little to do with the first. Wicca, early European polytheism and the stereotype of satanic witchcraft have very little to do with each other. This second occult is darker and less human than the first.
The second occult is exhaustively described but poorly documented. There are literally tens of thousands of books about the Freemasons, yet only a handful follow the historical method. There’s an enormous edifice of synthetic scholarship that can explain every single major event in western history in terms of your favorite shadowy conspiracy. This pile is one of the reasons that the first type of occult is so infrequently studied. Who wants to wade through all that? Who wants to be associated with that?
And there’s a third occult – call it the “faux-cult” – which is derivative from the second. These are the people who participate in the Christian fantasies for a variety of reasons. At least since the band Black Sabbath donned black, certain groups have used the occult look to sell records. Other people play to the occult stereotype just to get attention or get a horror thrill.
The first occult gets ignored by most people who aren’t directly involved. The second and third have a symbiotic relationship. When someone who has grown up reading Chick tracts and hearing about evil witches and demons wants to rebel a bit, what do they do? Maybe they break out the Ouija Board and scare themselves with the ideomotor effect. Maybe they go hardcore, pull out the heavy metal records and draw pentagrams on the floor. Maybe one or two even try out the weird blood ritual they read about in a feverish book written by a fundamentalist at 3am.
And then they grow up a bit, get born again and again, and tell their church that there really is a satanic conspiracy out there. They were part of it, after all.

Something that Christine O’Donnell said during talks about “witchcraft” caught my attention. At one point, she apparently told someone that the “pentagram” was a symbol of satanism and not a symbol of nature or Wicca the way some practitioners suggest.
The pentagram is one of those symbols that has been used by just about everyone at some point. Taoism has used it to represent the five elements, for example. All three Abrahamic faiths have used it, and Christians used to see it as symbolizing the five wounds of Christ. Granted, there’s the notion that the upwards-pointing star is holy while the downwards-pointed star is occult, but this seems to be a 19th century idea.
Where did the pentagram (or pentacle, pentalpha or pentangle) get the reputation for being a symbol of demonic powers? That seems to date back to a really interesting book of magic called the Testament of Solomon.
Pullquote: “And he answered: ”I am able to remove mountains, to overthrow the oaths of kings. I wither trees and make their leaves to fall off.” And I said to him: “Canst thou raise this stone, and lay it for the beginning of this corner which exists in the fair plan of the Temple?”
The Testament is seems to be either a Christian work or a Jewish work later modified by Christians. Although it claims to be written by Solomon in the first person, it’s loosely dated to the third century A.D.. Like a lot of magic books, possessing this would have gotten you arrested and probably burned during parts of the middle ages. Now it’s available for free on the internet.
The Testament is both a story and a magical guide. The story is simple enough: King Solomon is having trouble with the building of his Temple, because a demon is harassing the child of one his chief workmen. Solomon prays for help, and is given a ring by the archangel Michael. The ring would allow Solomon to bind the demons that were tormenting his workman’s child.
The ring had an engraved stone upon it, and different versions have different descriptions of the engraving. Probably the most common is the pentagram. The F. C. Conybeare translation from 1898 states this specifically:
“Take, O Solomon, king, son of David, the gift which the Lord God has sent thee, the highest Sabaoth. With it thou shalt lock up all demons of the earth, male and female; and with their help thou shalt build up Jerusalem. [But] thou [must] wear this seal of God. And this engraving of the seal of the ring sent thee is a Pentalpha.” (All quotes from the F. C. Conybeare translation, available online at the Esoteric Archives)
Solomon gives the ring to the workman’s child, who hurls it at the demon and captures him. Solomon interrogates the demon, then forces the demon to bring him other demons. Solomon interrogates each and forces them to help build his Temple. Today I believe that would be against union regulations.
Pullquote: “The twenty-ninth said: “I am called Anostêr. I engender uterine mania and pains in the bladder. If one powder into pure oil three seeds of laurel and smear it on, saying: ‘I exorcise thee, Anostêr. Stop by Marmaraô,’ at once I retreat.”
The bulk of the Testament are these interrogations, and it is this that makes the story a work of magic. Solomon forces each demon to state the sort of evil he or she performs, and how they can be repulsed. Here’s a good one:
And I at once bade another demon to be led unto me; and instantly there approached me the demon Asmodeus, bound, and I asked him: “Who art thou?” But he shot on me a glance of anger and rage, and said: “And who art thou?” And I said to him: “Thus punished as thou art, answerest thou me?” But he, with rage, said to me: “But how shall I answer thee, for thou art a son of man; whereas I was born an angel’s seed by a daughter of man, so that no word of our heavenly kind addressed to the earth-born can be overweening. [...]
And I Solomon, on hearing this, bound him more carefully, and ordered him to be flogged with thongs of ox-hide, and to tell me humbly what was his name and what his business. And he answered me thus: “I am called Asmodeus among mortals, and my business is to plot against the newly wedded, so that they may not know one another. And I sever them utterly by many calamities, and I waste away the beauty of virgin women, and estrange their hearts.”
[...]
And I adjured him by the name of the Lord Sabaôth, saying: “Fear God, Asmodeus, and tell me by what angel thou art frustrated.” But he said: “By Raphael, the archangel that stands before the throne of God. But the liver and gall of a fish put me to flight, when smoked over ashes of the tamarisk.” I again asked him, and said: “Hide not aught from me. For I am Solomon, son of David, King of Israel. Tell me the name of the fish which thou reverest.” And he answered: “It is the Glanos by name, and is found in the rivers of Assyria; wherefore it is that I roam about in those parts.”
Pullquote: “I then, wretch that I am, followed her advice, and the glory of God quite departed from me; and my spirit was darkened, and I became the sport of idols and demons. Wherefore I wrote out this Testament, that ye who get possession of it may pity, and attend to the last things, and not to the first.”
You can start to see how the book was intended to be used. Various demons are associated with various social problems and medical afflictions, and each provides a means of chasing them off. Of course, humans being as they are, a lot of attention fell on the ring itself. Protection is nice, but wouldn’t it be cool to command the demons instead?
According to the story, Solomon began worshiping Moloch in order to please his wife and the “spirit of God departed” him. No word on what happened to the ring. But this work started a whole genre of similar works, all hearkening back to Solomon and his demons. Later versions gave Solomon multiple rings, probably so that more symbols could be crammed in.
Derren Brown explains how he predicted the lottery (sound is off-sync but it’s the best I can find):
So, in conclusion, he says he used a “wisdom of the crowds” method where people guessed random numbers, then he averaged them together, to get the result. I think we all know that’s bullshit with random numerical systems. At the end he gives another option that he could have had an insider working at the lottery and fixed the machines, but he says that would be illegal and he wouldn’t admit to that if he did it.
Personally I don’t think either are what really happened and the explanation is a much simpler trick — I’m a bit disappointed that Darren said he was going to reveal how he did it, but didn’t.
Or did he? What do you think?

Copyright 2008-2012, Patheos. All rights reserved. Terms of Service | Patheos Privacy Policy

Follow Patheos
Atheist: