I’m reading John R. Coats’ Original Sinners: Why Genesis Still Matters, (which seems to be the softcover of his “Original Sinners: A New Interpretation of Genesis”). Coats has a light touch with biblical interpretation. He isn’t delving into textual criticism or grappling with the cultural context of ancient Israel.
One of the advantages of this is that he can talk about the characters without letting them get buried under etymological arguments or turning them into etiological symbols. The characters stand on their own … such as they are.
The ancient myths were not afraid of portraying their characters as very flawed or unsavory human beings. Think of Jacob, the trickster, conniving his brother’s inheritance away. Or Abraham: “Really she’s my sister!”
The same holds true across ancient cultures. Consider the Epic of Gilgamesh, where we see that the eponymous monarch is too forceful and arrogant for the citizens to deal with. We find that Gilgamesh has been demanding Droit de seigneur from brides-to-be, as he “does not leave a girl to her mother.”
In Greek legends, Hercules is the indefatigable savior of humanity, and also a violent buffoon always on the look out for his next bowl of lentil soup. We see both sides in Eurpides’ play Alcestis, in which Hercules becomes a drunken pest at a home in mourning. He makes amends by defeating Death and bringing the deceased back from Hades.
At some point, this tolerance for flawed characters came to an end. The myths were dragged, kicking and screaming, into a different era. Where they had been stories of how things came to be, now they were morality tales. I think you can start to see it in Chronicles, where the flaws of David and Solomon are largely omitted in the retelling.
Jews developed ways to find cryptic meanings in the text, allowing them to craft interpretations that erased the moral ambiguity. Greeks developed allegorical interpretations to do much the same thing, and passed those techniques down to Christians. It worked, in fact it worked extremely well for some stories.
But it doesn’t change what the stories actually say, or what the characters actually do. When Fundamentalists insist that the Bible should be read in the “plain sense,” they’re abandoning over 2000 years worth of experience in finding safe and pleasant interpretations.
Yet they still wish the stories to be morality tales rather that myth. You can almost pity them.

You may know of Dr. James McGrath, a professor of religion at Butler University. He’s the author of two excellent books on the history of Christianity, The Burial of Jesus and The Only True God. He’s also a blogger at
A lucky charm I made in college: card laminated with a 4-leaf clover
John Henry Fuseli’s 1781 painting “The Nightmare” is now seen as a classic account of sleep paralysis accredited to a demon

Follow Patheos
Atheist: