Weblog Awards – Blogkeeping note

If you are so inclined, you can vote for yours truly in a blog competition (just click the plus sign in the green circle) or nominate this blog in another category.

If you nominate in another category, here is the info to place in the comment section:

Warren Throckmorton – A College Psychology Professor’s Observations About Culture, Mental Health, Sexual Identity, and Religious Issues



There are many other great blogs being nominated as well. Go have a look…

"Its because we get in there and find out what makes ourselves tick. And we ..."

Fact and Fiction in Ravi Zacharias’ ..."
"That comment is old Warren, when I was not yet aware of the extent of ..."

Fact and Fiction in Ravi Zacharias’ ..."
"Most every person I've known who has gone through a 12 step program and took ..."

Fact and Fiction in Ravi Zacharias’ ..."
"And then there is your inability to deal with the facts. Cambridge, Oxford, etc.Facts mean ..."

Fact and Fiction in Ravi Zacharias’ ..."

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment
  • Lynn David

    PSYCHOLOGY: Don’t Get Even, Stay Mad

    By Gilbert Chin

    Declarations of unintentionality (“I didn’t mean to hurt you”) often suffice to defuse tense situations and to reduce or eliminate vengeful responses to a harmful act. But does the reining in of aggressive behavior reflect deliberate and effortful control of those impulses, or does the claim of a lack of purpose serve to dissolve one’s anger? Using a social evaluation setting, Krieglmeyer et al. obtain evidence linking the attribution of intention to a conscious overriding of impulsive aggression. They presented students with positive or negative ratings (from an unseen partner) of their ideas for naming a new energy drink; half of the students who had received negative feedback were then told that their partner had mistaken the high-low direction of the rating scale and had in fact intended to assign them positive marks. When assessed specifically for anger using an implicit measure and for behavior by means of the same rating scale, this set of students displayed a lower level of aggression as compared to the students whose negative assessments had been intentional (although they still exhibited a higher level of hostility than the students who had received positive ratings initially). In contrast, learning that the negative ratings had been delivered in error and that the actual intent had been to send positive feedback had no effect on the levels of implicit anger. — GJC

    J. Exp. Soc. Psych. 44, 10.1016/j/jesp.2008.10.003 (2008).

    Looking for a way to ameliorate your anger? Evidently, it won’t work!

  • Lynn David

    Whoops…. sorry, I meant to put that under your new Ayer’s post.

    See! I rated you wrong! LOL!


  • Evan

    I voted for this blog. Keep up the good balanced work!

  • Thanks Evan – Glad to have you aboard!