Footnotes Missing from Fellow Blogger Mark Driscoll’s Latest Post

After my post yesterday about Fellow Patheos Blogger Pastor Mark Driscoll’s citation issues, reader and college prof Aaron New sent along an example of another problem in Driscoll’s most recent Patheos blog post.

The post, “What is the Bible? Answering 4 Common Questions About the Bible: Part 1,” largely comes from his book with Gerry Breshears, Doctrine: What Christians Should Believe. To his credit, Driscoll alerted readers to that fact at the end of the post.

More troubling is the lack of quotes and citation for the following section. From yesterday’s post:

Driscoll Blog Post 100417

Now take a look at a book first published in 1997 (2nd edition in 2009) written by Aubrey Malphurs and titled, Ministry Nuts and Bolts: What They Don’t Teach Pastors in Seminary.  On page 190 of that book, Malphurs provides the following description of the Bible. The portion of interest begins in the third full sentence of the paragraph below.

Malphus book 1997 2009

The passages are nearly identical. Even though the facts are commonly known, the order, wording, and presentation of those facts are nearly the same in both places. The Driscoll and Breshears book has a 2010 copyright date; Malphurs’ book shows two copyright dates, 1997 and 2009. Most of the Malphurs’ material is also in the Doctrine book, but a couple of the copied sentences are only in the Patheos blog post.

Readers, I will leave it to you to draw your own conclusions. I report, you decide. Just to make it clear, below is the Patheos blog post passage with the identical material underlined. What is not underlined is only slightly reworded. Only a very few additional words were added.

Driscoll compared to Malphurs

There may be more instances like this. I only examined two paragraphs in the Patheos blog. I think some explanation should be forthcoming for why the water that was under the bridge is now gushing forth in this new season.

""Have you not been following the news lately? It does not appear that heterosexual men ..."

New Studies Point to Biological Basis ..."
"How can you say there is zero evidence? The Bible says so. That is evidence ..."

New Studies Point to Biological Basis ..."
"It has been explained to you by others why those are not comparable in their ..."

New Studies Point to Biological Basis ..."
"Paul is primarily talking about sexual behaviour, and would not have used romantic feelings to ..."

My Journey Away from Reparative Therapy

Browse Our Archives

Follow Us!


What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment