Is The Religious Left Really The Fuzzy Middle?
Pagan writer and elder Isaac Bonewits weighs in on the “religious left” and their ongoing lack of influence on the political sphere. Bonewits claims that the typical Christian/Jewish “left” (expounded on by people like Jim Wallis) isn’t the “left” at all, but instead typify a sort of theological mushy middle.
“I deeply suspect that monotheism, with the almost inevitible dualism that usually accompanies it, is part of the problem, not part of a solution. The culture wars are between dualists and pluralists, with liberal monotheists stuck uncomfortably in the fuzzy area between. This may be an an area where liberal Neopagans, Hindus, Voodooists, and Native religionists of many lands may have a role to play in the coming years. We know that the universe can count higher than two, so we’re not necessarily stuck in the mainstream Western culture’s dualist worldview.”
For Bonewits, liberal monotheists have to overcome their fear of confronting conservative extremists to be effective.
“When will the liberal monotheists have the courage to loudly, publically, and repeatedly state that people who believe their scriptures literally, and who believe those scriptures give them the right to kill other people, are insane rather than “misguided”? Because that seems to me to be the meme they should be spreading. When will they (liberal religionists) understand that tolerating bigots is not only intellectually and spiritually bankrupt, but also suicidal?”
While I find Bonewits’ writing to be as entertaining as always, I have to say I have grown increasingly uncomfortable with this take on monotheism (a take I have often adopted in the past). As the Republican party slowly implodes, the power of the “conservative” religious factions seems increasingly artificial. There is a growing sense among conservative-leaning evangelicals that they were being used to reap short-term political benefits instead of joining a (conservative) social revolution. The monotheist faiths are hardly monolithic, and terms like “liberal” and “conservative” apply less and less when it comes to matters of faith (this is true for Pagan religions as well). I don’t think the answer is the replacement of “dualistic” faith with “pluralistic” faith because I don’t think that any belief system is immune from corruption or selfish impulses.
2 responses so far