A modern Pagan perspectivePosts RSS Comments RSS

Does Eclectic Spirituality Make You Crazy?

Australian papers are reporting on the work of PhD candidate Dr. Rosemary Aird, who has done a study on the effects of “non-traditional” religious views on young adults.

“A UQ study has found that young adults with a belief in a spiritual or higher power other than God were at more risk of poorer mental health and deviant social behaviour than those who rejected these beliefs. Young men who held non-traditional religious views were at twice the risk of being more anxious and depressed than those with traditional beliefs. The study was based on surveys of 3705 21-year-olds in Brisbane under the Mater-University of Queensland Study of Pregnancy.”

While Dr. Aird admits that the only common thread in all those surveyed is a sense of “individualism”, and that the correlation between mental health and those who hold “non-traditional” religious views deserves “further study”, that hasn’t stopped the Brisbane Times from making some sweeping conclusions.

“DIY religions cause more harm than good: Meditation, crystal therapy, self-help books – think they’re making you happier? Think again. A Brisbane academic has found a strong link between new-age spirituality and poor mental health in young people.”

As for Dr. Aird, while she portrays those without a traditional religious home as “cast adrift” and in danger of experiencing “real confusion”, she is forced to admit that gathering conclusive data on this topic would be almost impossible.

“While the study suggests a need for further research into the extent that religious change is linked to population mental health, she admits such a task would be enormous. “Research used to look only at traditional religion and used things like church attendance as a measurement. “These people don’t go to church – they’re meditating, they’re reading books, they might be part of a group or just attend courses. “There’s no way of measuring all of those different types of things.’”

In other words, there is no hard evidence that young adults who engage in “DIY” religions, or religions that hold “a belief in a spiritual or higher power other than God”, are in any greater risk for mental illness or “deviant” social behavior than those who hold to a “traditional” form of faith. This study made no attempt to differentiate between different forms of “non-traditional” forms of belief, and frankly, proves little except the personal biases of Dr. Aird.

“People who are into the new-age spirituality tend to shop around and will often borrow from all sorts of old beliefs, like Wicca, witchcraft or Native American religions. It’s a whole mish-mash and changes all the time, where they’ll do something for a while before doing something else … Religion and belief has kind of become mixed up with popular culture. Look at television and the kinds of shows that we’ve got, like Supernatural, Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Medium. They promote witchcraft, special powers and spirituality and the general population and young people especially are exposed to these things and could see them as very attractive.”

Kids these days! With their “Buffy” and their mish-mash psuedo-Wiccan style! They are all crazy I tell ya, I have scientific proof!

9 responses so far

  • Innocent Dave

    Of course “non-traditional religions” cause deviant behavior and mental health issues.”Deviant Behaviour” is a lovely catch-all term for people who just Aren’t Like Us, and Pagans are fulfilling many definitions of deviant behaviour just by being pagans.”Insanity” is another widely abused, judgemental term often used to denounce people acting outside society’s boundaries. A useful paralel can be drawn here with the soviet union’s treatment of it’s detractors – ‘The Soviet Union is a perfect heaven on earth for the masses. This is plain for everyone to see. Therefore, anyone working against us is trying to destroy a utopia, and must logically be evil or insane.’Everyone knows christianity is the way forwards. It’s in the bible! Anyone who doesn’t believe must be insane or illiterate.This all stinks of pseudoscience – the researcher’s got all the data together and then largely ingored it in favour of saying what they expected to find in the first place.Also, since when is paganism non-traditional? I was under the impression that it drew on a vast pool of traditions stretching back further than recorded history, let alone some upstart religion that’s barely 2000yrs old.

  • Robin Edgar

    Well said Dave. The whole post but this part in particular -”Insanity” is another widely abused, judgemental term often used to denounce people acting outside society’s boundaries.No kidding. . .

  • Mattexian

    From my own observations, the mental problems come first, usually followed with disaffection/disillusionment/ejection from a Xian church, then comes a seeking that leads to some variety(s) of paganism. Sounds more like the “researchers” have their theory and conclusion backwards.

  • Barbara

    I’m someone who is spiritual but refuses to put a label on my faith. I take something profound from many different belief systems, and even come up with some on my own.As such, I find that the biggest problem I have is with finding spiritual community. So it doesn’t surprise me if people who are eclectic in their beliefs have more mental health issues. Humans are a social species, and if there’s one thing we like to feel at home with and able to communicate freely about, it’s our beliefs. At the same time, we don’t teach kids to be very resilient as lone wolfs. Those who are naturally introverted (as I am) are called loners or mavericks as if there’s something wrong with being different or not fitting into a social structured or setting. Still I feel a need for community.Perhaps we need to stop grouping people by what belief sets they belong to, and start building communities based on tolerance toward each person’s individual experience of life.

  • Paula

    “Perhaps we need to stop grouping people by what belief sets they belong to, and start building communities based on tolerance toward each person’s individual experience of life.”Well said, Barbara. It’s a pity that this seems to be easier said then done.

  • h sofia

    You know, – and this is going to sound really, really harsh – to my mind this is roughly equivalent to a group of slaveowners doing a “study” of black slaves in early 19th century US and then declaring that being a black person put one at greater risk for “mental problems.” That article is irresponsible and the study is not scientific.

  • Aquila ka Hecate

    Just a technical point – since when is she actually Dr Aird?I see she’s listed (as you noted, Jason) as a PhD candidate, and holds a BSc.She’s apparently not entitled, yet, to the honorific of Dr.Love,Terri in Joburg

  • Bill. Rune

    I do not think it really matters what labeled group of people you look at, be they of separate faiths, ideals, nationality, hair colour, eye colour… you get my drift;-) you will always find a percentage with an imbalance of some kind or another. Reading the article, and this is just my opinion that Rosemary Aird, does come off somewhat bias. I guess that is her prerogative and her opinion which she is entitled to just as we all have our own views.Makes no difference what religion you follow, they all have their bad eggs. You only need to pick up a paper or turn the news on to hear yet again another case of abuse within the more traditional religions… Do not throw stones if you dwell in a glass house ;-)

  • Luke

    There is also the matter of the glaring logical problems of the argument. Cum hoc ergo propter hoc.