<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Theological Necessity of Goats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patheos.com/blogs/wildhunt/2008/03/theological-necessity-of-goats.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/wildhunt/2008/03/theological-necessity-of-goats.html</link>
	<description>A modern Pagan perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carly</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/wildhunt/2008/03/theological-necessity-of-goats.html#comment-1792</link>
		<dc:creator>Carly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 19:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patheos.com/blogs/wildhunt/2008/03/the-theological-necessity-of-goats.html#comment-1792</guid>
		<description>Personally, I will probably never sacrifice animals as part of ritual, since I am one of those who is generally squeamish about any sort of blood, guts, etc. However, just because I am uncomfortable with the act does not mean that I have the right to limit other peoples&#039; right to do it. That is the idea that these religious rightists need to figure out. Their rights only go so far, and stop when they begin limiting other peoples&#039; rights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I will probably never sacrifice animals as part of ritual, since I am one of those who is generally squeamish about any sort of blood, guts, etc. However, just because I am uncomfortable with the act does not mean that I have the right to limit other peoples&#8217; right to do it. That is the idea that these religious rightists need to figure out. Their rights only go so far, and stop when they begin limiting other peoples&#8217; rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yvonne</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/wildhunt/2008/03/theological-necessity-of-goats.html#comment-1791</link>
		<dc:creator>Yvonne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 09:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patheos.com/blogs/wildhunt/2008/03/the-theological-necessity-of-goats.html#comment-1791</guid>
		<description>I think the general squeamishness about animal sacrifice stems from two things: 1. misapprehension about what it involves (in the Bible it is sometimes described as the total destruction of the animal); and 2.  a general inability to face up to the fact that meat comes from dead animals.I have no problem with a humanely killed animal being dedicated and shared as a communal meal.I do have a problem with ideas of substitutionary sacrifice for propitiation or expiation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the general squeamishness about animal sacrifice stems from two things: 1. misapprehension about what it involves (in the Bible it is sometimes described as the total destruction of the animal); and 2.  a general inability to face up to the fact that meat comes from dead animals.I have no problem with a humanely killed animal being dedicated and shared as a communal meal.I do have a problem with ideas of substitutionary sacrifice for propitiation or expiation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Pitzl-Waters</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/wildhunt/2008/03/theological-necessity-of-goats.html#comment-1790</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Pitzl-Waters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 03:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patheos.com/blogs/wildhunt/2008/03/the-theological-necessity-of-goats.html#comment-1790</guid>
		<description>Keith,&quot;killing animals in a sacred manner which are then eaten to sustain the community is FAR more ethical than eating a burger churned out by an industrial slaughterhouse. (Frankly, the burger has no claim to the &quot;ethical&quot; label at all.)&quot;I completely agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keith,&#8221;killing animals in a sacred manner which are then eaten to sustain the community is FAR more ethical than eating a burger churned out by an industrial slaughterhouse. (Frankly, the burger has no claim to the &#8220;ethical&#8221; label at all.)&#8221;I completely agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/wildhunt/2008/03/theological-necessity-of-goats.html#comment-1789</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 00:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patheos.com/blogs/wildhunt/2008/03/the-theological-necessity-of-goats.html#comment-1789</guid>
		<description>Thanks for paying attention to stuff like this; I think it&#039;s important. I&#039;m going to quibble with the last sentence of your footnote, though: killing animals in a sacred manner which are then eaten to sustain the community is FAR more ethical than eating a burger churned out by an industrial slaughterhouse. (Frankly, the burger has no claim to the &quot;ethical&quot; label at all.)I have only performed a live animal sacrifice once, but I would venture to say that that was probably the most ethical, respectful, sacred meal I have ever prepared. I will certainly be doing it again. If I lived rurally or communally, I&#039;d do it as often as I could manage it. I feel FAR better about killing the animal myself than I feel about the rotisserie chickens I&#039;m occasionally forced by necessity to bring home from the supermarket. And I don&#039;t see anything in the world wrong with offering the gods Their share, and using every part of the sacrifice as thoroughly as possible, on every level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for paying attention to stuff like this; I think it&#8217;s important. I&#8217;m going to quibble with the last sentence of your footnote, though: killing animals in a sacred manner which are then eaten to sustain the community is FAR more ethical than eating a burger churned out by an industrial slaughterhouse. (Frankly, the burger has no claim to the &#8220;ethical&#8221; label at all.)I have only performed a live animal sacrifice once, but I would venture to say that that was probably the most ethical, respectful, sacred meal I have ever prepared. I will certainly be doing it again. If I lived rurally or communally, I&#8217;d do it as often as I could manage it. I feel FAR better about killing the animal myself than I feel about the rotisserie chickens I&#8217;m occasionally forced by necessity to bring home from the supermarket. And I don&#8217;t see anything in the world wrong with offering the gods Their share, and using every part of the sacrifice as thoroughly as possible, on every level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.024 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 274/282 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.patheos.com @ 2012-02-10 02:12:22 -->
