Comments on: The Cross is Secular (Except When it Isn't)

By: The Wild Hunt » The Dangers of Secularizing the Cross

The Wild Hunt » The Dangers of Secularizing the Cross — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:38:48 +0000

[...] by time and history. This has resulted in some rather insulting assumptions by cross-defenders and involves a good bit of historical revisionism. Now with before the Supreme Court of the United States hearing arguments in the case of Salazar v. [...]

By: Robin Edgar

Robin Edgar — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:30:11 +0000

It isn't

Looks like there were some HTML issues

By: David M

David M — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:30:09 +0000

Oops! I meant to say "the crucifix was NOT part of church iconography before the tenth century".

By: Lori

Lori — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:30:09 +0000

The cross is an "Easter Cross"? Since When is Easter a Secular thing? Easter is Totally Christian. An angel would be more secular.

By: Tracie the Red

Tracie the Red — Sat, 17 Jan 2009 19:31:08 +0000

Got a point there about it not being secular.

If I'm a bit delirious, put it down to the fever I'm trying to fight off.