A modern Pagan perspectivePosts RSS Comments RSS

Witch-Hunts Then and Now

Johann Hari at Slate.com, heartbroken by witnessing the ongoing brutal persecution of women and children as “witches” throughout Africa, reads through two recently released books, “The Enemy Within: 2,000 Years of Witch-hunting in the Western World”, and “The Last Witch of Langenburg: Murder in a German Village”, for insight.What he finds are some haunting commonalities as European, American, and African people from different eras find the “other” within their own ranks. Scarred communities responding to collective trauma by lashing out at the primal giver of life.

“Yet this doesn’t explain why witch hunting keeps taking the same form every time, with only mild variations. Why, in particular, is it almost always targeted at women? … Demos [author of "The Enemy Within"] believes there is a primal reason for this. “A mother—a woman—is the primal Other, the nonself from which the self is progressively distinguished; further, she disposes a kind of absolute power to meet, or reject, infantile need,” he writes. “As such, she retains forever afterward an aura of what a discerning psychologist has called ‘magically formidable’ qualities.” So when we begin to suspect all-powerful dark forces, we suspect women first—because our mothers once held all-encompassing powers over us.”

So perhaps the two sides arguing over who exactly were killed during the European witch-hunts are both (to differing extents) right. There most likely wasn’t a surviving witch-cult dating to before the advent of Christianity, but perhaps women were especially targeted because on some level they became representatives of the primal mother. A communal subconscious rebellion against a dark Creatrix who they blamed for their suffering and torment. So the Mother (and her young offspring) must be cleansed and destroyed. Of course Hari points out a far simpler reason for why women were targeted, they were easy prey.

“I think this misses a starker and simpler explanation. Women are generally weaker than men. They are less able to defend themselves from braying mobs. They are easier to pin down and turn into a screaming, denying receptacle of evil. The mobs usually choose the weakest women of all—old women and little girls.”

Hari’s article ends with the “Satanic Panic” and “Satanic Ritual Abuse” madness of the 1980s (a madness we are still feeling the ramifications of) as proof that it can still happen in advanced and “rational” America. Indeed, Hari references former VP candidate Sarah Palin’s interactions with self-proclaimed “witch-hunter” Thomas Muthee as proof that this madness never fully goes away (it can be of little coincidence that Palin’s Third-Wave pals, with their anti-goddess rhetoric get along so well with a man who lies/brags about terrorizing women). That example, and the (so-far) isolated cases of witch-related abuse here on our own shores, should keep us ever vigilant (especially when it is very dangerous to be a “witch” in a recession). We must, as Hari writes, in times of hysteria and panic demand hard evidence and settle for nothing less.

“…the hysteria will happen again. We don’t know yet who the victims are, but they are out there, oblivious. There is an enemy within—dormant in our own fragile minds and emerging with paranoid intensity at times of stress. Our only antidote is to insist on evidence. Whenever there are charges against a person or group, we must ask insistently: How do we know? Show me the proof. Show me three times. Show me 10.”

A reoccurring question at The Wild Hunt has been: “why should Pagans care about witch-hunts in Africa or the Middle-East”? While I have argued (somewhat pragmatically) that as modern Pagans and Witches spread around the globe, we will have no choice but become a factor in places that are persecuting “witches” (as is already happening in India and South Africa), there is another possible answer emerging. That all witch-hunts are connected by a common thread of fear and hatred, and if they aren’t addressed and stopped by the forces of tolerance and rationality, they become like a virus spreading beyond the “host” community.

I certainly don’t agree with everything Starhawk says, but she does have a point that modern Pagan Witches have chosen to reclaim the label “witch” for themselves. It is folly to think the African or Middle-East witch-hunts will forever stay safely away from the “real” Witches in America, Europe, or Australia, or that when it is exported it will be forever contained in immigrant communities. Someday, if we continue to insist that women and children being killed as “witches” if faraway lands isn’t a “Pagan” problem, we might wake up to find our own communities poisoned by a need to find “the other” within their own ranks. What better place for the panicked and hysterical to look than the increasingly public and “out” community of self-proclaimed “Witches”?

26 responses so far

  • http://ecoyogini.blogspot.com EcoY

    Although thought provoking, still yet there seems to be another option for 'why women?' All societies mentioned above where/when witch hunts occurred had appalling women's rights. Women in the original 'witch hunts' in North America and Europe had virtually no rights as human beings at that time. They were easily targeted because legally there was no true recourse. Also, in order to be successful with decreasing women's rights, patriarchal machinations worked long and hard to portray women as deserving of this lower class, both 'scientifically' and religiously. Thus, blaming women, already having little to no rights/values in social constructs, was not such a stretch. Unfortunately, in many societies today women have minimal rights and are viewed as second class citizens (if they are considered 'human' at all). Often women are the 'property' of men, and only have value through this connection. It would surprise me if these cultures who are currently participating in 'witch' hunts are egalitarian in social construct and religion.

  • http://www.paganrightsalliance.org Damon Leff

    Thank you saying no to modern Witch-hunts.

    Self-defined Witches in South Africa have chosen to reclaim the terms. We also seek to bring an end to actual Witch-hunts (against non-Witches) in South Africa. We will not ignore the silent voices of those who were killed after being falsely accused of being or practicing Witchcraft in our country.

    http://touchstoneadvocacy.ning.com/

  • http://www.paganrightsalliance.org Damon Leff

    Thank you saying no to modern Witch-hunts.

    Self-defined Witches in South Africa have chosen to reclaim the terms. We also seek to bring an end to actual Witch-hunts (against non-Witches) in South Africa. We will not ignore the silent voices of those who were killed after being falsely accused of being or practicing Witchcraft in our country.

    http://touchstoneadvocacy.ning.com/

  • http://www.paganrightsalliance.org Damon Leff

    Thank you saying no to modern Witch-hunts.

    Self-defined Witches in South Africa have chosen to reclaim the terms. We also seek to bring an end to actual Witch-hunts (against non-Witches) in South Africa. We will not ignore the silent voices of those who were killed after being falsely accused of being or practicing Witchcraft in our country.

    http://touchstoneadvocacy.ning.com/

  • FredOak

    Have to agree with EcoY, in that the "hunts" seem to have historically always been centered around a matter of control in patriarchal societies.
    I once attended a re-enacted witch trial that happened in Virgina and was selected to play one of the town elders. Myself and the other elders were allowed to question witnesses guided by the town magistrate (who had the historical knowledge and help direct things).
    After we were finished we were to render a verdict and our reasoning. We found her not guilty, because the only reason she was accused was so the local church leader (with help from the poor woman's neighbor) could acquire her land if she were found guilty.
    We found out afterwards that our verdict apparently agreed with the historical one.
    But I think this illustrates that it was a power move by men over a supposed weaker woman.

  • http://www.robinartisson.com Robin Artisson

    Why should we care about witch hunts in Africa or Asia? Because an injustice which is allowed to thrive or persist anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. The ancients knew that we were all connected to one another and every other form in creation- without this connection, there would be no ability to communicate with each other or with the Gods; the seen and the unseen could never overlap or communicate without this subtle connection. All are connected; what people do anywhere absolutely affects us, even if the affects are not blatant and easy to point out.

    We watched 9/11 happen- and it was based partly on things our government had done overseas. The roots of that tragedy went back to wars between Soviets and Afghanistani that happened quite a long time ago, and even to wars and political decisions made before that. It's all part of an inter-linked and inter-locked chain of events. The wise people of this world have to care, in a special way, about every single movement and event within the sacred populations of life. If you choose to ignore everything except what you can see and feel with your eyes and hands, then you will be very surprised one day as you or yours plunge to death unexpectedly, or find yourself suffering the deeds of others you never met.

    Look at Christianity. A strange Hebraic religious reformer/prophet/madman who may or may not have existed is walking around the distant end of the Mediterranean sea, preaching and causing trouble in a completely insignificant, backwater Roman province, and within 400 years of his supposed death, the world's greatest empire is run by a man who calls this executed, bizzare man "God". Within another 600 years, all of Europe's native faiths are crushed underfoot, people have died, temples and countless art and literary treasures and cultural treasures have been consigned to a trash-heap, and a new dark age has begun. And we are all affected- strongly- by it today.

    A few nutcases believing that a crucified man was "God" trickled out into a massive and ancient Pagan world, and within a handful of centuries, had managed to change the world forever. The events in distant Judea are events that we might not have cared to pay much attention to if we had lived back then, but maybe we should have…

  • http://egregores.blogspot.com/ Apuleius Platonicus

    As horrific as the modern day witch-hunting in some parts of Africa is, it is a very different kind of phenomenon from what occurred in Europe. The difference is that European witch-hunting was merely one aspect of an overall pattern that R.I. Moore has called "The Persecuting Society". This "persecuting society", according to Moore, came into being during the 10th and 11th centuries. The important thing is that there was really nothing aberrant about the witch-hunts in Europe – it was just another manifestation of a systemic tendency to persecution that is peculiar to European society and is not a general feature all human societies. In fact, at some point in history even European society was not a persecuting society. Moore places the threshold somewhere in the 10th or 11th centuries, but I think that needs to be pushed back further – all the way to 381, in fact.

  • http://www.robinartisson.com Robin Artisson

    Honestly, I can't say that I agree that only European societies have some feature towards persecution of members. I think "persecution" has many shapes and forms and many motivations, and you'll find it in any society you look in close enough. Islamic society had and still has many layers of it. Of course, the author you are reading may have a very specific definition of "persecution", in which case a conversation on this will be difficult to have until I've read him- or you've explained!

  • http://egregores.blogspot.com/ Apuleius Platonicus

    It is unfortunately all too true that all human societies "have some features towards persecution of members." However, the question is to what extent persecution is a systemic feature of a given society (or for any group of people). This is a tricky issue but one that is unavoidable. When persecution occurs it is vitally important to be able to distinguish between the aberrant actions of isolated individuals, on the one hand, and the collective actions of a whole society (or significant sections of a society), on the other hand. If a lone nutjob acting on his own burns a cross that is one thing; if he is a member of wider organized movement that is another thing; and if he is the local sheriff who enjoys the enthusiastic support of his racist constituency, that is still another thing.

    R.I. Moore's approach is based on looking at the simultaneous persecutions of lepers, Jews, gay people, and heretics (from the years 950-1250) and asking "whether the explanation was to be sought not among the victims, but among the persecutors". Moore concluded that by the 12th century western Europeans had developed a "habit" of persecution, but that prior to the 11th century whatever persecutions occurred were not of the "habitual" variety. Moore also somberly concluded that this habit continued "thereafter for the rest of its [western European] history at least until the middle of the 20th century." And, as I already mentioned, Moore explicitly concluded that "persecution societies", that is, societies with a systemic penchant for habitual persecution, are the exception rather than the rule in human societies. This is no way amounts to a claim that any human sociiety is ever free of all persecution whatsoever.

    Moore does not use any special definition of persecution. All of the specific examples of persecution that he discusses (lepers, Jews, gays, and heretics) are well known and completely uncontroversial in terms of historical facts. What is controversial is Moore's analysis of, as he puts it, "the persecutor", ie, of western European society.

    Moore is not some crank, btw, nor is his book in any way obscure. Anyone interested in the subject of religious persecution, especially of the history of persecution in Europe, can hardly afford to be unaware of his work. He is the general editor of the Blackwell History of the World series:
    http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-380075.h…

    Here is a link to the book itself:
    http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productC…

  • http://www.paganrightsalliance.org Damon Leff

    People in Africa find many variant reasons to accuse others of Witchcraft. During the 1990's the expelling and killing of suspected Witches occurred frequently in several provinces in South Africa. The findings of a Commission of Inquiry into Witchcraft Violence and Ritual Murder in the Northern Province chaired by Professor N. V. Ralushai in 1995 showed that witch-hunts were the result of many different causes, including on the one hand simple jealousy, and on the other, politically motivated violence by African National Congress cadres.

    'Stepping Stones Nigeria' has identified as major causes of child witchcraft, abandonment and killing:
    * Religious profiteering
    * Extreme poverty
    * Disintegration of the extended family structure
    * Ignorance and superstitious beliefs
    * Broken marriages
    http://www.steppingstonesnigeria.org/node/18

    I personally don't think Europeans are more likely to persecute than Asians or Africans. I simply don't think one can reduce Witch-hunts globally to a need for persecution without examining the driving fears and anxieties behind the acts of Witchcraft-related violence.

    Since the 1990's Witch-hunts in South Africa have been random and sporadic, but they have continued to occur at an alarming rate. These incidences have targeted an equal number of men and women of all ages, including children. In every instance the accused has been innocent of the accusations.

    Many of these witch-hunts do not occur in rural out-of-the-way places – they occur in urban and semi-urban cities and towns across 9 provinces.

    I agree with the statement made by Jason… "That all witch-hunts are connected by a common thread of fear and hatred, and if they aren’t addressed and stopped by the forces of tolerance and rationality, they become like a virus spreading beyond the “host” community."

    In South Africa we have attempted to identify what we have called 'Ideologies of Conflict' – beliefs held by both traditional African and modern South African cultures and religions that are used to a) justify fear of Witchcraft, and b) justify action taken to end the perceived threat of Witchcraft. These may not always be the conscious motivation for Witch-sniffing (a local term) or accusations of bewitchment, but they are systemically institutionalized in every sphere of South African society.

  • http://apaganheart.blogspot.com embreis

    Given that both Christianity and Islam teach that the universe was created by an entity who routinely condemns those who displease him to eternal torment, it is hardly surprising that persecutions frequently occur in cultures that are dominated by those faiths.
    Does that have anything to do with African and Asian witchhunts? I don't know. Clearly, both Christianity and Islam have penetrated Africa and South Asia heavily over the centuries. Is there any evidence that witch hunting predates monotheism in either of these place? I admit I don't know, but it seems to be a reasonable question to ask.
    This is not to say that polytheistic cultures are immune to the habit of persecutions. The Romans certainly were not above it, and I'm not just talking about their treatment of the early Christians. But persecutions seem rarely to have been endemic.

  • http://stroppyrabbit.blogspot.com Yewtree

    Whether or not the witch-persecution in Africa is the same or different from European witch-hunts, it has been influenced by pre-modern ideas about witches from Europe. And we should care because these are fellow human beings who are being persecuted, tortured, and killed.

    However, we MUST be careful not to compound the persecution they are experiencing by our own use of the witch label. I can just imagine some fundamentalist saying that witchcraft is a decadent Western phenomenon, imported from the West, and therefore being doubly keen to persecute "witches" in Africa and elsewhere.

  • http://www.hellenistai.com Ruadhán

    How is legal powerlessness not a weakness?

  • http://www.paganrightsalliance.org Damon Leff

    The words 'Witch' and 'Witchcraft are already criminalized in legislation as well as cultural and religious belief in South Africa. Choosing not to use the words to self-define for fear of upsetting Witch-hunters and fundamentalists who encourage such hunts will not stop Witch-hunts – it will simply remove any voice of opposition against the Witch-hunters.

    We S.A. Witches don't care for the anti-reclamation position. It's the position of a coward unwilling to stand up against injustice and human rights abuses in Africa!

    Cultural and religious beliefs that promote prejudice against Witchcraft should be opposed and challenged.

  • http://www.paganrightsalliance.org Damon Leff

    Yes, Christianity has and does play a role in the suppression of Witchcraft and in promoting action against perceived Witchcraft in South Africa. Islam to a much lesser extent here.

    Yes Witch-hunting in Africa did occur prior to European Christian colonization of Africa.

  • http://stroppyrabbit.blogspot.com Yewtree

    Hi Damon,
    I am not against reclaiming the word witch – I use it to describe myself. Of course you are "on the ground" in SA so are more likely to know whether it will help or harm those accused of "witchcraft" if we use the label. I am just warning that we should be careful, as we want to help those accused, not make their situation worse.

    I have also taken active steps to support "witch children" by donating to the charity Stepping Stones Nigeria, which helps them. I also supported their work by setting up a group on Facebook. And I publicised the petition for Fawza Falih as widely as possible.

  • http://www.paganrightsalliance.org Damon Leff

    I apologize for causing offense if I have Yewtree. Well done to you for doing the right thing.

    I don't think the situation in South Africa could be worse than it is. Every week people who do not self-define as Witches are murdered. Our politicians won't champion their cause because it would amount to political suicide in a nation in which most people still believe no good can come from Witches. Our government remains silent and the ruling ANC refuses to discuss this issue with white-skinned South African Witches because an erroneous cultural legend leads them to believe that white -skinned people don't practice "real Witchcraft".

    This in a country that has a constitution founded on the principles of dignity and equality.

    The only people challenging Witch-hunts and prejudice against Witchcraft in South Africa are self-defined Witches (who just happen to be white).

  • http://stroppyrabbit.blogspot.com Yewtree

    Hi Damon, in that case I can understand why you feel so strongly about the issue.

    I was thinking of the case of Fawza Falih, where the people who were organising the petition on her behalf cautioned against using the W-word in the letters in her defence.

  • http://www.paganrightsalliance.org Damon Leff

    I understand yes. In central and northern Africa, where movements and individuals have voiced opposition to Witch-hunts, the general position taken has been one of skepticism – Witchcraft is viewed solely as a superstition. Can one presume there are no self-defined Witches in these countries to contradict the rational approach of skepticism?

    It should be noted that the prejudicial stereotype generally promoted to characterize Witches in Africa (and elsewhere), automatically criminalizes and demonizes any person who may choose to self-define as a Witch. This kind of institutionalized scapegoating contradicts the letter and spirit of human rights law.

    One might be forgiven for presuming that the Umthakathi in Africa is a flesh-devouring beast who travels on a hyiena and flies in a magic aeroplane to bring drought, famine and every manner of misfortune. It is a lie.

    In the South African context real self-defined Witches do exist. We don't intend to hide or become victims of Witch-hunts. We cannot and will not accept human rights violations where Witchcraft is imputed.

    We take the position that the prejudicial stereotypes which motivate fear of Witchcraft in Africa can and must be reformed. What better way to do that than by showing that real Witches do exist?!

  • http://www.paganrightsalliance.org Damon Leff

    I understand yes. In central and northern Africa, where movements and individuals have voiced opposition to Witch-hunts, the general position taken has been one of skepticism – Witchcraft is viewed solely as a superstition. Can one presume there are no self-defined Witches in these countries to contradict the rational approach of skepticism?

    It should be noted that the prejudicial stereotype generally promoted to characterize Witches in Africa (and elsewhere), automatically criminalizes and demonizes any person who may choose to self-define as a Witch. This kind of institutionalized scapegoating contradicts the letter and spirit of human rights law.

    One might be forgiven for presuming that the Umthakathi in Africa is a flesh-devouring beast who travels on a hyiena and flies in a magic aeroplane to bring drought, famine and every manner of misfortune. It is a lie.

    In the South African context real self-defined Witches do exist. We don't intend to hide or become victims of Witch-hunts. We cannot and will not accept human rights violations where Witchcraft is imputed.

    We take the position that the prejudicial stereotypes which motivate fear of Witchcraft in Africa can and must be reformed. What better way to do that than by showing that real Witches do exist?!

  • Awena

    Damon has it. Human rights are important to all humans. Pagans have not only the stewardship of the Earth to be concerned with, but the humans along with the rest of nature to protect. So how can anyone think that witch-hunts in far-away lands aren't our problem? Even if I wasn't Pagan I'd still consider it my problem!

  • Ananta Androscoggin

    Both of those monotheisms preach that their all-knowing, all-seeing, omnipresent, omnipotent deity will personally do unto what they call "sinners" when he's ready to.

    But they have little to no faith, or they're tyring to grease the wheels to better their own eventual positions in the afterlife, and usurp his authority to do their own killing and punishing of "sinners."

    Gives me little faith in the possibility of the possession of simple humanity by far too many monotheists.

  • Curious44

    I find your conversiation very interesting and since i am researching on witch hunt globally and do not want to potray it in my research as an African problem only, please could you highlight witch hunting in Asia? or anyother place apart from Africa

  • Jason Pitzl-Waters

    India: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/4pwb5b” target=”_blank”>http://tinyurl.com/4pwb5b and Saudi Arabia: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/2do4zu” target=”_blank”>http://tinyurl.com/2do4zu to start with.

  • Curious44

    Thank you. Do you think witch hunting has to do with colonialism and the search for a real identity. Most African justify this hunts as a part of thier cultural and traditional heritage. They think that by so doing, the west would feel guilty to interfer. On the other side you have countries like the USA, Britain and Germany who could swear not to have any form of witch hunting in this 21st century. Does or has anyone heard of recent cases in these countries?

  • http://www.paganrightsalliance.org Damon Leff

    In answer to the first part of your question…

    I don't think one can say that witch hunting is a direct result of colonialism or the search for a real identity no. Certainly Christian colonial attitudes towards Witchcraft influenced how indigenous religions were perceived by observers and continue to influence current attitudes to and beliefs about Witchcraft in Africa.

    I am of the opinion that justifying Witch-hunts on the basis of cultural or traditional heritage must be condemned. We aught never to condone human rights abuses on the basis of what we believe.