A modern Pagan perspectivePosts RSS Comments RSS

Return of the “I Believe” Plates

Religion Clause reports that South Carolina Attorney General Henry McMaster has issued a ruling that clears the way for a non-profit group to have the infamous “I Believe” Christian licence plates produced.


The new “I Believe” design.

“Nine months after a federal judge barred the state from making legislatively approved plates with the religious message, Attorney General Henry McMaster says a similar plate designed by a nonprofit group is legal. The plate under review at the Department of Motor Vehicles reads http://www.IBELIEVEsc.net along the top. It features a golden sunrise and on the left, three crosses symbolizing the site where Jesus was crucified .  The nonprofit group applied for the plates in February under state law that allows private groups to create specialty plates, if they pay a $4,000 deposit or collect at least 400 prepaid orders before production. It officially changed its name to the website address, in hopes of meeting new DMV rules that require tags bear the sponsoring group’s name.”

The original “I Believe” plates were ruled unconstitutional due to the fact that they were sponsored by the South Carolina legislature, creating the impression of a state-sponsored religion. The DMV has yet to decide if these new plates are indeed legal.

This entire license plate case has been haunted by modern Paganism. McMaster released a campaign video referencing the famous Great Falls Darla Wynne case, in which a Wiccan won a court battle against sectarian government prayer. In the video McMaster vows to fight for prayers to Jesus, and he further proved his commitment to Christian sectarianism by attending pro-plate Christian rallies. Meanwhile, U.S. District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie, who ruled that the plates were unconstitutional, was also one of the judges to find in Darla Wynne’s favor during her many court battles. In addition, State Sen. Yancey McGill made plain that “any” religion could get a license plate, so long as they weren’t Wiccans.

“In South Carolina, Baptists wanted the tag on cars here and pitched the idea to Republican South Carolina Lt. Gov. Andre Bauer’s chief of staff. State Sen. Yancey McGill, a Kingstree Democrat, got the bill passed in a couple of days without even having a public hearing or debate. “It’s a great idea,” McGill said Tuesday, calling it an opportunity to express beliefs. “People don’t have to buy them. But it affords them that opportunity. I welcome any religion tags.” What about Wicca, commonly referred to as witchcraft? “Well, that’s not what I consider to be a religion,” McGill said.”

Leaving aside the biases of Christian politicians, the question now is if the DMV approves these new “I Believe” plates under the state’s non-profits program, will they then in turn approve other sectarian plates? Hindu plates? Wiccan plates? Any faith so long as they meet the requirements? Are religious plates secular if the sectarian iconography is in the logo?

“The specialty license program has a secular purpose – allowing all nonprofit organizations to identify themselves by a logo or symbol,” McMaster wrote in his Aug. 16 opinion. “It is our opinion that the Establishment Clause would not be violated by approval of the plate. Indeed, it is our opinion that denial would infringe upon the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment.”

We should be paying close attention to what the DMV rules in the instance, and we should be quick in testing the parameters of an approval to see if the law will be applied similarly to all religious non-profits. If Christ’s cross is OK as a logo, then a Wiccan, Druid, Asatru, Hindu, or Buddhist symbol should be as well. If they aren’t, then we may have another court battle on our hands.

24 responses so far

  • Thud

    I thought the homosexual movement already learned this lesson: staying hidden just perpetuates the abuse.

  • Baurch Dreamstalker

    Yes, this is news worthy if only because one official excluded Wiccans from who might be accommodated.

  • http://www.cherryhillseminary.org Holli Emore

    A few additional pieces of information about this story:
    First, all of this must be seen in the context of McMaster’s bid for governor. He lost in the primary to Nikki (Palin) Haley, but has been stumping for a good while now, getting a lot of mileage out of issues like the I Believe tage.
    Second, SC has so many specialty tags that it is ridiculous. There is a tag sponsored by the atheists group, but they tell me that they have a lot of trouble purchasing it when they go to the DMV. Still, it was approved and produced.
    Third, a neocon Christian group with very deep pockets (to call them a nonprofit really feels like an oxymoron!) watched this whole case and within perhaps a day or so of the court ruling, they had paid the fee and applied for permission to do the tag. If all they wanted was to be able to drive with an I Believe tag, why did they wait until the state had gone through a court case and an appeal? A web search on the name Oran Smith will tell more about this group.
    By the way, you may recall that one of the plaintiffs in the case was an evangelical Christian minister who opposed the tag because, as he said, it cheapened his religion, relegating it to the status of an advertisement on an auto.

    Holli Emore
    in Columbia, SC

  • http://www.mindonfire.com xJane

    haha, my sister once said that the purpose of bumper stickers was to amuse those driving behind you in traffic

  • Tea

    As if it's possible to live in this country and NOT know about Christ. I wish!

  • thelettuceman

    New York is back to the Goldenrod and Blue. :P

  • Eran Rathan

    Who?

    just kidding. My favorite response to the "Have you found God?" line is: "No, why, did you lose yours?"

  • EvilFerret

    Ooooh, I want a button (I don't drive) that says that! Commie heathen media establishment!

  • The L

    "Vanity of vanities, says the wise man, vanity of vanities."

    –Ecclesiastes 1:1

    Pretty much sums it up, I think. ;)

  • http://xkcd.com/285/ Eran Rathan

    Was that done pre- or post- Civil War?

  • Crystal7431

    My devotion is without question when I have this snazzy license plate to prove it.

  • Crystal7431

    This is exactly what I was going to say. Thank you, Eran.

  • Kevin Norwood

    I hate to say it but I don’t believe that we will ever see plates for any faith other then that of the Judeo-Christian faith. While I would like to expess my faith is such a way I know this will never happen. Yes I guess at some point it might cheapen someones faith but when do we get to express ours? I’ve lived here in Columbia, SC for seven years now & I believe it’s time to be able to express our faith as well.

  • Kevin Norwood

    Hello Holli see you at the next meet!

  • IMBACK1966

    Ted Kaczynski.

  • IMBACK1966

    Religion is indigenous and connected to a specific culture.

  • IMBACK1966

    Since when have we been a civil society?

  • Bookhousegal

    Err…. What?

  • Bookhousegal

    Religious groups don't constitute 'establishments of religion?'

  • Bookhousegal

    It is, however, a founding principle by which we claim authority to be independent and govern ourselves in the first place.

  • Bookhousegal

    Actually, how bout 'LadyLibertyLeague.org?' :)

  • thelettuceman

    "Or until the Constitution is amended to include sexual orientation as a protected class. " I wish it were that easy. :/

  • Eran Rathan

    It is listed at the beginning of the US Legal Code – I'd say that makes it part of the laws of the land.

  • Nick_Ritter

    I have noticed this as well. I find it's not too good of an idea to get stuck behind cars sporting fish.