Richard Carrier has yet another rebuttal to Bart Ehrman posted. More of the same. Solid, substantive, with air-tight arguments. Typical Carrier.
Also, it links to all of Ehrman’s replies so that readers can easily go there and make sure Ehrman says what Carriers says he says. I recently received a comment from JesseW saying that Ehrman has not returned the courtesy.
One oddity about Ehrman’s blog post making the reply is that he neglected to actually link to the original review he was replying to. And when I added a comment with such a link, it was rejected (all comments are moderated before posting, similarly to this blog).
I’ve now attempted to post it again, along with a link to this reply. We’ll see if it goes through.
Here’s a screenshot as proof that I did submit the comment: http://imgur.com/2vGBg
I checked to confirm and sure enough, JesseW was right. This seems like very odd behavior on Ehrman’s part.