LA Times board weighs in on Greece v. Galloway.

Paul Fidalgo pinged out a piece by the LA Times editorial board, which had a great quote about the Greece v. Galloway case:

Ideally, the court would … recognize that, in an America in which an increasing number of citizens identify with no religion, even nonsectarian, lowest-common-denominator prayers can exclude and marginalize nonbelievers. Obviously a Jew who goes to a town meeting to petition for a permit will be made uncomfortable when he is urged to join in a prayer to “our Lord Jesus.” But an atheist in the same position will be equally offended by a request that he join in a prayer to a generic God.

Of course, it is not the government’s job to avert offense, as pretty much anything it does will offend some of the people it represents.  No, the role of our government is to maximize the quality of life for as many Americans as possible.  Part of this is making sure that it represents all citizens equally while not, say, giving preference to Christians over anybody else.

Were Christians the minority, they would worry about a majority taking over that may not represent them equally with everybody else.  Sadly, there doesn’t seem to be enough empathy in some to see the situation from any vantage point but that of the majority, greedy for the government to serve them.

"It does come off as shady, doesn't it."

I’ll be doing a debate in ..."
"so you are against the mentally challenged as well, huh, "Ed"? Seems you have no ..."

Frank Turek fears me. Also he ..."
"sure, Ed, sure....again, when you can't make an argument, and like most new atheists, start ..."

Frank Turek fears me. Also he ..."
"ah yes...when you have no evidence nor scholarly authoritative knowledge, make the usual ad-hominem attacks...well ..."

Frank Turek fears me. Also he ..."

Browse Our Archives

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment