An email from Jason.

Holy crap the news is slow today.  Hey, good job, world!  Way to not have a whole lot of shitty things going on for 24 hours. So let’s hit up the inbox.  Here’s one from Jason: I love you more than anyone alive does. God is real and exists. Jesus loved you so much that [Read More...]

Bored tonight at 10pm Eastern? Watch the RDF’s Stephanie Guttormson debate VenomFang X on Age of Reason.

My friend Stephanie Guttormson, the Operations Director for the Richard Dawkins Foundation, will be on the show Age of Reason tonight debating VenomFang X over the reliability of the bible.  Should be fun.  If 10pm Eastern rolls around and you want some entertainment, just click here.  :) Stephanie is worthy of much greater opponents, but he’ll [Read More...]

FAITH & DEBATE: Matt Dillahunty gives us an exhaustive video on morality.

This is complete and as perfect as I think it could be. Matt has been producing a long series of excellent videos.  If you’d like to support his Patreon you can do so here. [Read more...]

Debate (Do the findings of science entail that Christianity is false?): John’s second rebuttal.

Here is John’s second rebuttal.  Closing rounds up next. My opening. John’s opening. My first rebuttal. John’s first rebuttal. My second rebuttal. JT says ‘This is how things “can be proven false” in terms of scientific falsifiability and John does nothing to explain why false, by scientific standards, should work any other way.’    I’m not offering any [Read More...]

Debate (Do the findings of science entail that Christianity is false?): my second rebuttal.

Here is my second rebuttal. My opening. John’s opening. My first rebuttal. John’s first rebuttal. On Lepp’s opening salvo about the burden of proof, his first premise in his argument is “‘Falsifiable’ means ‘can be proven false.’”  I showed precisely what I meant in my first rebuttal: If you calculate that a rock dropped from 10′ [Read More...]

Debate (Do the findings of science entail that Christianity is false?): John Lepp’s first rebuttal.

Here is John Lepp’s first rebuttal. My opening. John’s opening. My first rebuttal Let’s go over some basics on who has the burden of proof:  The debate topic is “Do the findings of science entail that Christianity is false?”  Whoever is making an assertion of fact has the burden of proof.  The assertion is “Science [Read More...]

Debate (Do the findings of science entail that Christianity is false?): my first rebuttal.

This is the next entry in my debate with John Lepp over “Do the findings of science entail that Christianity is false?”  While we agreed to rounds of 1,500 words, I had a beast of a time trimming down my post so that it adequately hit all of John’s arguments.  It simply takes longer to [Read More...]

Debate (Do the findings of science entail that Christianity is false?): John Lepp’s opening.

Here’s my opening.  Below is John’s opening: Let me start this by thanking JT for the opportunity to have a lively discussion, on his blog “WWJTD?” (aka What would JT do?), about whether or not Science refutes Christianity.  I will argue that Science does not refute Christianity. This is my very first debate.  I suspect [Read More...]

Debate with John Lepp: Do the findings of science entail that Christianity is false?

A while back John Lepp emailed me about doing an online debate.  I agreed.  Since then, as many of you know, I have been sick and dealing with rapid weight loss, etc.  He has been very patient.  Today, it finally begins.  We’re doing four rounds, each gets an opening, rebuttal 1, rebuttal 2, then closing. [Read More...]

David Silverman kicks wholesale ass in debate with Frank Turek.

Frank Turek is a particularly bad apologist with whom I have almost tangled in the past (he fears me).  But he got into a debate with David Silverman earlier this year and positively got his ass handed to him.  Enjoy. [Read more...]


CLOSE | X

HIDE | X