Let's go!" Sue meaning of jiyang pity on her smooth forehead gently, took her hand to the sweet floor  Look at the departures were red me, mom finally Heat Jerseys Cheap came up with a good idea

Hangzhou, but it turns out, it is not huge, just a few cup, face get red, eyes also became blurred Chaff "this is the first, I call you daddy beat the rest of the chaff head Heat Jerseys crushed, so eat up, wouldn't have choked throat

He opened his eyes, WuQiaoQiao tightening up http://www.fansfavor.com/nba-mens-jerseys-miami-heat-jerseys-c-1_19.html your hand, and a face of surprise: "black polish, you didn't die, you wake up?!" Looking at her dirty white clothes, Xu Chenyang subconsciously to swing open, arms and head there was  a sharp pain, he couldn't help but frown All blame yourself strong,  thought he was everything, but when he met the grinch, he didn't know that Heat Jerseys For Sale what is called someone outside the person, behind, in particular, this is only 18 years old girl, three years ago, let him take orally the loss, so had to HanHen sweeping the The NBA announced the team this year, Chris Paul, kobe Bryant, lebron James, Kevin durant and Tim Duncan was elected to the first team.

The second squad is: Tony parker, Russell, brooke, carmelo Anthony, Blake griffin and mark - gasol.

The third lineup: James harden, dwyane wade, Paul, George and David lee and Dwight Howard.

In 119 people voted, James is the only player got all first votes. This season he led 66-16, is the only NBA in scoring (26.8 points per game), rebounds (8.0 RPG) and assists (7.3 assists) three data led a team player. In addition, he also in this season for the second consecutive year won the MVP trophy.

Kobe Bryant to play 78 games this season, averaging 38.6 minutes, 27.3 points and 5.6 rebounds 6.0 assists. This is the 11th time in kobe Bryant's career, he tied the Karl Malone, become the most selected a number of players in NBA history.

Duncan, 37, also became the second player in NBA history in a burst of, second only to 85-86 season kareem abdul-jabbar, kareem abdul-jabbar is 38 years old at that time.

It Kevin durant is the fourth time in a while, he is averaging 28.1 points this season, and joined the "50/40/90 club", he is after larry bird, the second in scored 28 points and also selected the club's player. floor now, become the world's most handsome the most to fetch and carry the younger brother I'm depressed, have no carefully hide, see the maple took my skirt, temper somehow, a hard CH20130524TMH to pull back to skirt, and the HSS to 1, the hem of the dress was torn

Almost missed your post in amongst all the others ... do you not whittle your pole then?

p.s. WTF has happened to this site ... a forum which is a spam trap and a blog where the latest Recent Comments section seems some what sub-optimal in its execution. Then we have signing in to Disqus to post with the added benefit of vote up and down buttons - that will come in handy!

Jabster, I feel dumb. I just got the intended/unintended: pole wittling and being given a hand.

Bad bump bump.

@Sunny D

yes indeedey ... anyway I'm whittling away at my pole as we speak and I'm hoping to get it erected at the weekend - my better half says they'll will give me hand if need be.

That wooshing sound you heard was, nevermind Obliviousness is another of her superpowers.

I'm impressed, Sunny, you actually learned something. Good job, keep it up. ^_^

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Totem
"A totem is a being, object, or symbol representing an animal or plant that serves as an emblem of a group of people, such as a family, clan, group, lineage, or tribe, reminding them of their ancestry (or mythic past).[1] In kinship and descent, if the apical ancestor of a clan is nonhuman, it is called a totem. Normally this belief is accompanied by a totemic myth. They have been around for many years.
...
In modern times, some single individuals, not otherwise involved in the practice of a tribal religion, have chosen to adopt a personal spirit animal helper, which has special meaning to them, and may refer to this as a totem. This non-traditional usage of the term is prevalent in the New Age movement and the mythopoetic men's movement."

Kessy is of course free demonstrate her amazing superpower of being ignorant of a subject yet somehow knowing if someone else is wrong about it.

@Jabster due to my Native American heritage it wouldn't feel right to me to use a Totem Pole, you could prolly get away with it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Totem_pole
"Poles illustrate stories that commemorate historic persons, represent shamanic powers, or provide objects of public ridicule."

Consider putting the face of a wolf on each side of the pole to represent your connection to Gemini. With a crow hanging droopingly from one of it's mouths?

@Sunny D

Excellent ... looks like you've got your stalker back which gives me sometime to concentrate on receiving wisdom from the master himself:

http://www.wisdomofchopra.com/

... and working out how to make the best of my animal totem - a wolf apparently. Not sure how this stacks up with being a Gemini though. Any ideas?

p.s. Now maybe Kessy will start refering to Sunny Day & co in every other post.

Aaaaaaand you apparently don't know what "New Age" means, either. Honestly, do you *ever* think? And it's not my fault that your faith doesn't stand up to critical analysis.

Given your amusing preoccupation with new agey malarkey its easy to be confused which definition of totem you want to use. Still, I take your meaning with the same seriousness as if you claimed to be a member of House Hufflepuff.

"And just because you agree with a poster's argument doesn't make it the superior one. Show me that I'm wrong and I'll change my opinion."

HA HA HA HA.

(facepalm) You don't actually know what the word "totem" means, do you?

Noun

totem (plural totems)

Any natural object or living creature that serves as an emblem of a tribe, clan or family.

Honest, it's a completely mundane term, nothing mystical about it at all.

And just because you agree with a poster's argument doesn't make it the superior one. Show me that I'm wrong and I'll change my opinion. But just saying, "Well, it's *obviously* woo," isn't showing anything other then your prejudice.

Totem animal, totem spirit, pfft as if one category of woo is any different to me than the other.

I haven't promised you FA. But the heaping plates presented to you buy other posters in the multiple threads you've blown up you've thoroughly demonstrated your steadfast refusal.

@Sunny: LOL, you keep promising me a meal of crow, but all you've served up so far is a bunch of empty plates.

And I said totem animal, not totem spirit. Totem as in mascot. You're probably thinking of a spirit guide, which is something different. Don't read more into what I say then is actually there.

Custy, I really don't see why you're pushing this. I think you know you're only going to make yourself more upset. But since you insist...

I do change my opinion, all the time. Just in the discussion of acupuncture, I started out just thinking that I vaguely remembered hearing somewhere that there was some research supporting it. Then I looked it up, found what the NIH, NHS, and WHO had to say, and thought that made it seem really quite solid. In fact, at one point I was going to use acupuncture as an example of evidence based medicine that's not Western. I'm glad I didn't, because what Noelle had to say changed my opinion and now I'd say that the evidence for acupuncture isn't nearly as solid as I had been thinking.

The problem is that changing my opinion isn't what you want. You want me to simply agree with you. A while ago, I said to you that if I hadn't convinced you of my position, that's my fault because it's my responsibility to present a convincing argument. It works the other way, too. If you want me to accept your position, you have to present a convincing argument. Convincing to me, not to you. Reasonable people can look at the same facts and come to very different conclusions. That's something that everyone needs to accept and respect.

For example, it's entirely reasonable to look at the evidence we've examined about acupuncture and conclude that the evidence isn't very strong, and it seems pretty unlikely that there's anything to it. On the other hand, it's also entirely reasonable to look at it and conclude that there's enough positive evidence there that there may well be something there and it's well worth pursing further. The evidence we currently have simply isn't conclusive either way. There's certainly not the evidence to support a conclusion that acupuncture is unequivocally nothing but a placebo and there's no controversy about it. Considering that the NIH, WHO, and NHS are disagreeing with you, claiming that there's no controversy seems especially absurd.

Just look at the facts? You know it's not that simple, and there's always interpretation involved. I don't know if you're qualified to look at the raw data of dozens of clinical trials and draw conclusions from them, but I know I'm not. Interpreting evidence well requires skill and experience, so the collective judgement of groups of professionals (such as at NIH, NHS, and WHO) is what should be given the greatest weight. That doesn't mean they can't be wrong, but it does mean they're much more likely to be right then me.

"ALL THAT YOU DO can be summed up by one phrase: "Teach the controversy!""

As you may have noticed, I love a good mystery. I'm drawn to anything enigmatic or uncertain. That's just how I am, so it's only natural that the conversations I get most involved in concern things that are in some way mysterious or controversial. I entirely understand if you don't care for that sort of thing, if you want to deal with things that are more certain and well defined. But if that's the case, you should simply avoid conversations that stray into such topics, not attack me for being interested in them.

And it's worth noting that there's a big difference between an intellectual question, "Does Bigfoot exist?" and a political issue, "What should education policy be?" Policy issues typically require us to make a definite decision in the near term, intellectual issues typically do not. And as far as I can tell, we seem to mostly agree on policy.

Hey what happened to Kessy's post about her totem spirit being a crow? I was so going to reply to it but now its kind of contextless. Oh well here it goes anyway.

"Actually the Crow thing would make sense considering your steadfast refusal to eat it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eating_crow"

[Got caught in the spam purge. Fixed. Thanks for the notice. - Vorjack]

Well, that was a massive barrage of straw-men!

" Are you so afraid of giving "them" a victory that you can't even agree to disagree? "

Are you fucking serious? You massive MASSIVE hypocrite! I've seen you proved wrong in threads on this site again and again and again and again and again, and you have not budged an inch. You have repeatedly ignored evidence you didn't like, deflected, complained, diverted and - just like now - built up straw-men to argue against.

So let me answer your question: I care that people don't get conned by charlatans who pretend to be able to do things THEY CANNOT DO and to cure things THEY CANNOT CURE. I care about people claiming that placebo effect and regression to mean is some kind of magical woo-woo proof for their UTTER bullshit.

" Are you really going to abandon your own principles and resort to the sort of sophistry we see from fundies? "

OMIGODTHEHYPOCRISYITBUUUUUURNS!!!!! ALL THAT YOU DO can be summed up by one phrase: "Teach the controversy!" - But just like creationism versus evolution, THERE IS NO CONTROVERSY!

"Are you really going to give more credence to a site that can only charitably be called an advocacy site with an agenda then you are to the NIH, NHS, and WHO because it tells you what you want to hear?"

Advocacy site?! LOLOLOLOLOLOL! Ye Gods, you're so deluded! And anyway, no. What I did was to go to the primary sources - the ACTUAL evidence. The data. The FACTS that do not rely on subjective opinion. I suggest you follow the links on that site and actually educate yourself.

Just ONCE it would be fucking amazing to see you actually attempt to assimilate actual facts and alter your opinion. You are TOTALLY unable to do that. You have this closed-minded, intractable, unmoveable position. And you're not even honest about it! Masking "I believe in woo-woo" behind "I just think you need to look at the evidence!" - Well I HAVE looked at the evidence, and it does NOT support the woo-woo.

LOL for once I agree with you, Sunny. Although I'm not sure I should be a bear. My totem animal has always been much more the crow. And besides, I wouldn't want to infringe on Ursa's turf. ;)

~_~ You just can't let it go, can you, Custy? Are you really so caught up in this us versus them attitude that you can't give a single millimeter? Are you so afraid of giving "them" a victory that you can't even agree to disagree? Are you really going to abandon your own principles and resort to the sort of sophistry we see from fundies? Are you really going to give more credence to a site that can only charitably be called an advocacy site with an agenda then you are to the NIH, NHS, and WHO because it tells you what you want to hear? Is that really the road you want to walk? Is that really the person you want to be?

I'll be very sad if that's the path you choose, Custy. Because I won't go down it again - it leads to very dark and terrible places. And because you're better then that.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Don%27t_poke_the_bear

Acupuncture. Eviscerated.

http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/a-very-special-issue-of-medical-acupuncture/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

"But let’s look at the rest of what Dr. Hobbes wrote. Truly, it could very well have qualified for Kimball Atwood’s much missed feature, the Weekly Waluation of the Weasel Words of Woo. I particularly like the part where he contrasts the “traditional paradigms that many of us use every day in treating patients” versus the “views that are informed by those subjects we studied in medical school.” Notice how he refers to his beliefs about “acupuncture” as “paradigms” and what he was taught in medical school about the science that says that acupuncture is pseudoscience as “views.” It’s a simultaneously subtle (if you’re not familiar with CAM weasel words) and not-so-subtle (if you are) denigration of scientific medicine. I also like how he uses what I consider to be the racist distinction between “Western” medicine (i.e., evidence- and science-based medicine) and “Oriental” medicine (i.e., traditional Chinese medicine). Seriously, does he even realize the implication he’s making, namely that “Western” medicine is scientific and “Oriental medicine” is touchy-feeling and “holistic”? Doesn’t he realize that there are some damned good “Oriental scientists,” every bit on par with “Western” scientists, and that they have come to the same conclusion, namely that acupuncture is placebo?"

Not entirely sure which one you're referring to.

Maybe one of these?

A summary of why the most commonly cited evidence for the historicity of Jesus isn't evidence.

A summary of why despite the lack of actual evidence, some historical Jesus is the most likely explanation for the origin of christianity (and why that doesn't really tell us anything).

I am following a discussion about the historicity of Jesus.
I remember that Vorjack/Nox posted in the forum some pretty comprehensive commentary, but I could not find anything beside Nox's Wall of Text, which is not very focused on the topic.
Help? =)

@Noelle: I completely agree with everything you said about looking for causal mechanisms. You're absolutely right that this is an essential part of the scientific process and a major avenue to further discoveries. What I've been saying is that it's not appropriate to refuse to even look to see if there's an effect in the first place because there's no established causal mechanism. Like you said, looking for the how and why is the next step after establishing that there is an effect. It's not a precondition.

I thought it was very obvious reading those sources that they weren't exactly declaring acupuncture to be a miracle cure. Which was never the point to begin with. As I said in the OP, "I think it's a mistake to simply dismiss everything in the field as woo out of hand. A lot of things included in CAM have had far too little research done to reach any firm conclusions one way or the other. And for those that have had research done, the results are not as universally negative as some people seem to think." I am essentially arguing against the notion that there are the things "proven" by science, and then there's complete and utter woo, and absolutely nothing in between.

For those interested in the Prince Charles aspect for the NHS advice here's a short article in the Guardian from last week.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2013/feb/13/prince-charity-lobbied-government-homeopathy

@FO: Then I owe you an apology. If I'd realized that what you were turning around comments that'd been made to you with what you said about the death of curiosity, I'd never have tried to turn it around again.

While I obviously can't speak to the behavior of the people you've dealt with, I certainly understand the frustration of dealing with people who simply pigeonhole you and don't really listen to what you're saying. However, is it a good idea to judge an entire field of inquiry based on the obnoxious behavior of some of the people who are interested in it? Would it be fair to judge conventional science by the behavior of woo warriors like Jabster & Co? I'm just guessing, but do you think that might be exactly what the people you've dealt with were doing?

Although it's in no way an excuse for bad behavior, and certainly does not apply to everyone interested in CAM, I do think it's important to keep in mind where a lot of those folks are coming from. Generally, people who speak primarily in terms like "cosmic intelligence" and "tree of life" have little or no background in hard science. A lot of them are completely unfamiliar with the idea of scientific rigor, and are speaking in very general metaphorical terms. And remember that in this context, "energy" is being used in pretty much the same sense as in, "I have no energy in the morning until I've had my coffee."

The NHS link is interesting, too. Originally the NHS' online advice about homeopathy, acupuncture, etc. basically amounted to "It's a load of bollocks, save your money", but Prince Charles is a massive CAM enthusiast and he exerted a lot of political sway to get that changed. It's quite the scandal amongst British doctors and sceptics, and many of us who are employed by the NHS have been shouting very loudly and waving Cochrane Systematic Reviews at people over it for a while.

@Kessy: because I hear long and wide that I have no curiosity, that I have no imagination, that I am intellectually rigid and stiff because I don't buy into woo.

This by people who could not care less about evidence unless it's to validate their pet ideas and that refuse to understand reality outside of human-sized ideas ("memory", "cosmic intelligence", "tree of life", "spirit", "energy", "love").

This said, you definitely got my point.

Godsdamnit, Yoav, what the hell is worng with you people? Honestly, I try to show just a little concern about someone I like and respect and I'm being condescending?? Yeah, just like how if I try worrying about someone's emotional well being here it's suddenly an attack! But no, all you lot care about is showing the world hoe much Righter you are then everyone else, because that makes you ever so special and superior. Being right doesn't matter, because guess what? In the end, we're all wrong. deal with it. Things don't matter, people do. And ideas are very definiately things. Get your fraking priorities straight. And if all you want to do is sit at your computer and stroke your ego about how much smarter you are then all those idots in the world who don't think like you do, you can shove it up your ass. Because you know what the measure of being a good person is? It's not believing the right ideas. It's not saying the right thing. It's not hanging out with the right crowd. It's what you do, and how you treat other people.

We're finally having a residents only parking zone put in! No more inability to park due to soccer parents on school runs! No more eight car family over the road taking up the whole street with their cars! I'm so happy!

Wow Kessy, that was some condescending shit even by your standards. The altmed proponents are not just disinterested in testing their claim, they spent a lot of money lobbying all over the world so they can sell their magic potions without having to submit to the kind of testing required for actual medicine, if they really cared they would have spent the money on proving their stuff actually work and then we wouldn't had to have this discussion.