<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Unreasonable Faith Forum &#187; Topic: new zealand churchs puts up &quot;god hard act to follow&quot; sign, Joseph &amp; Mary in bed.</title>
		<link>http://forums.patheos.com/forums/unreasonablefaith/topic.php?id=389</link>
		<description>A Reasonable Forum on Religion, Science, Skepticism, and Atheism</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.1</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://forums.patheos.com/forums/unreasonablefaith/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://forums.patheos.com/forums/unreasonablefaith/rss.php?topic=389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>Ty on "new zealand churchs puts up &quot;god hard act to follow&quot; sign, Joseph &amp; Mary in bed."</title>
			<link>http://forums.patheos.com/forums/unreasonablefaith/topic.php?id=389#post-6073</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Ty</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">6073@http://forums.patheos.com/forums/unreasonablefaith/</guid>
			<description><p>I call that a forfeit.  Now I'm going to hit on his girlfriend, and break into his locker and steal all his shit.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>PuntyBunny on "new zealand churchs puts up &quot;god hard act to follow&quot; sign, Joseph &amp; Mary in bed."</title>
			<link>http://forums.patheos.com/forums/unreasonablefaith/topic.php?id=389#post-6072</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>PuntyBunny</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">6072@http://forums.patheos.com/forums/unreasonablefaith/</guid>
			<description><p>ty - he did show. But your pathetic lack of faith clouded your sight. Try more tithing. They say that helps.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ty on "new zealand churchs puts up &quot;god hard act to follow&quot; sign, Joseph &amp; Mary in bed."</title>
			<link>http://forums.patheos.com/forums/unreasonablefaith/topic.php?id=389#post-6069</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 18:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Ty</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">6069@http://forums.patheos.com/forums/unreasonablefaith/</guid>
			<description><p>I will happily meet the Lord out by the bike racks after school to settle it once and for all.</p>
<p>I'm guessing he won't show.  Chickenshit.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>PuntyBunny on "new zealand churchs puts up &quot;god hard act to follow&quot; sign, Joseph &amp; Mary in bed."</title>
			<link>http://forums.patheos.com/forums/unreasonablefaith/topic.php?id=389#post-6063</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 01:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>PuntyBunny</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">6063@http://forums.patheos.com/forums/unreasonablefaith/</guid>
			<description><p>Thou shall not MOCK the lord! (Especially his private man parts.)
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ty on "new zealand churchs puts up &quot;god hard act to follow&quot; sign, Joseph &amp; Mary in bed."</title>
			<link>http://forums.patheos.com/forums/unreasonablefaith/topic.php?id=389#post-6062</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Ty</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">6062@http://forums.patheos.com/forums/unreasonablefaith/</guid>
			<description><p>"yeah, man. god's dick must be fuckin' epic. "</p>
<p>I dunno man, he strikes me as someone who spends a lot of time compensating.</p>
<p>Just sayin'...
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>PuntyBunny on "new zealand churchs puts up &quot;god hard act to follow&quot; sign, Joseph &amp; Mary in bed."</title>
			<link>http://forums.patheos.com/forums/unreasonablefaith/topic.php?id=389#post-6061</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 22:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>PuntyBunny</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">6061@http://forums.patheos.com/forums/unreasonablefaith/</guid>
			<description><p>I thought....weren't Mary &#38; Joseph supposed to have had other kids? Or is that beleive some places but not Catholicism therefore she can be a virgin forever?
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Joe B on "new zealand churchs puts up &quot;god hard act to follow&quot; sign, Joseph &amp; Mary in bed."</title>
			<link>http://forums.patheos.com/forums/unreasonablefaith/topic.php?id=389#post-6060</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 22:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Joe B</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">6060@http://forums.patheos.com/forums/unreasonablefaith/</guid>
			<description><blockquote cite><p>Rufus: The nature of God and the Virgin Mary, those are leaps of faith. But to believe a married couple never got down? Well, that's just plain gullibility. </p></blockquote>
<p>Really it's only blasphemy for Catholics who have it from Papal authority that Mary remained a virgin. As far as I know protestants are fine with the idea of Mary and Joseph having gotten it on after Jesus was born.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>420 on "new zealand churchs puts up &quot;god hard act to follow&quot; sign, Joseph &amp; Mary in bed."</title>
			<link>http://forums.patheos.com/forums/unreasonablefaith/topic.php?id=389#post-6059</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 21:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>420</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">6059@http://forums.patheos.com/forums/unreasonablefaith/</guid>
			<description><p>yeah, man. god's dick must be fuckin' epic.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jeremy on "new zealand churchs puts up &quot;god hard act to follow&quot; sign, Joseph &amp; Mary in bed."</title>
			<link>http://forums.patheos.com/forums/unreasonablefaith/topic.php?id=389#post-6058</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">6058@http://forums.patheos.com/forums/unreasonablefaith/</guid>
			<description><p>My mom-in-law attends a similar church (United Church of Canada).  They rarely take the bible seriously and never think that anybody is going to hell.</p>
<p>Which is a good step I guess.  But why the facade?  She's fairly up-front and unapologetic about the church being a social gathering and a forum for discussing political issues and social activism.  The sense of community and desire for social activism are good things (it's a left-leaning church, thankfully), and I don't want to discourage that, but why wrap it in the cloak of a silly religion you mostly don't believe in the first place? </p>
<p>The optimist in me believes churches like this, or the one in the news story, are evidence of the beginning of the end for Christianity.  A lot of them know it's all baloney, they're just going through the motions because it's tradition and carries a sense of community.  But that'll die out soon when they realize those things can be found elsewhere.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>PuntyBunny on "new zealand churchs puts up &quot;god hard act to follow&quot; sign, Joseph &amp; Mary in bed."</title>
			<link>http://forums.patheos.com/forums/unreasonablefaith/topic.php?id=389#post-6057</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>PuntyBunny</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">6057@http://forums.patheos.com/forums/unreasonablefaith/</guid>
			<description><p>Yeah, I had similar thoughts. Like, wait...you're saying a virgin birth is crazy talk, yet you HAVE A CHURCH. Wha...? This seems more something to get attention than to really advance any actual debate or thought.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jeremy on "new zealand churchs puts up &quot;god hard act to follow&quot; sign, Joseph &amp; Mary in bed."</title>
			<link>http://forums.patheos.com/forums/unreasonablefaith/topic.php?id=389#post-6056</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 17:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">6056@http://forums.patheos.com/forums/unreasonablefaith/</guid>
			<description><p>It's lame.  I kinda wonder what goes through the minds of believers like that though.  They're clearly the more "liberal" kind.  They just want to "get people talking" considering their plummeting attendance, and don't care too much about any possible blasphemy.  Surely they must realize deep down that it's all just a fairy tale anyway.
</p></description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>PuntyBunny on "new zealand churchs puts up &quot;god hard act to follow&quot; sign, Joseph &amp; Mary in bed."</title>
			<link>http://forums.patheos.com/forums/unreasonablefaith/topic.php?id=389#post-6055</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 17:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>PuntyBunny</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">6055@http://forums.patheos.com/forums/unreasonablefaith/</guid>
			<description><p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/17/joseph-mary-billboard-god-is-a-hard-act-to-follow_n_395343.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/17/joseph-mary-billboard-god-is-a-hard-act-to-follow_n_395343.html</a>
</p></description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
