Bridging the (Persian) gulf<\/div>\n
<\/p><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n
Change often occurs at a faster pace than people can comprehend. That is certainly the case with the quickly-shifting political realities in Washington on Iran. In less than 50 days, America will be led by a president who made dialogue with Tehran a campaign promise \u2013 and yet he won. Perhaps even more surprising, one of the most powerful lobbies in Washington failed \u2013 in the middle of an election year \u2013 to convince the US Congress to pass a resolution calling for a naval blockade of Iran, even though the resolution had more than 250 co-sponsors.<\/p>\n
The debate in Washington is no longer whether to negotiate with Iran, but how, when and in what sequence such negotiations should take place. This, however, does not mean that talks will occur or that they will succeed. This is partly due to an unchanging feature of the political landscape in Washington \u2013 the reliance on economic sanctions to look tough and to gain leverage.<\/p>\n
President-elect Barack Obama, who told the American Israel Public Affairs Committee earlier this year that he stood firm on his call for negotiations with Iran and his promise to do away with \u201cself-defeating preconditions\u201d, has sought to balance his pro-dialogue position by adopting a strong appetite for additional economic sanctions against Iran. While a senator, he was the original co-sponsor of the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability and Divestment Act of 2008, which would have intensified existing sanctions and paved the way for additional divestment. Obama argued at the time that sanctions were an integral part of any diplomatic strategy. \u201cIn addition to an aggressive, direct, and principled diplomatic effort, we must continue to increase economic pressure on Iran\u201d, he said in a statement. Some of Obama\u2019s advisors have taken this a step further and argued that sticks \u2013 meaning sanctions \u2013 would have to come first in any carrot-and-stick approach to Iran.<\/p>\n
Obama is, of course, absolutely correct that any successful approach to Iran must include a combination of incentives and disincentives. And sanctions can theoretically provide the United States with additional leverage over Iran. The problem with this line of thinking, however, is that it fails to recognise that existing sanctions already provide the United States with significant leverage. <\/p>\n
But this leverage can only be utilised in the context of a negotiation. Sanctions can play a critical function in a US negotiation with Iran if, that is, Washington is willing to do away with them in return for significant Iranian behavioural change. That willingness has thus far not existed in Washington. The definition of leverage in the Bush administration was one\u2019s ability to get something for nothing. That approach has clearly failed; it does not characterise negotiations, but rather ultimatums and threats. In negotiations, you can only get something by giving something. Indeed, it\u2019s not the threat or imposition of new sanctions that will change Iranian behaviour, but rather the offer to lift existing sanctions. Herein lies America\u2019s as yet untapped reservoir of leverage over Iran. <\/p>\n
The crux, of course, is that this leverage only can be actualised if Washington and Tehran find their way to the negotiation table. And that is why the inclination to impose new sanctions prior to the commencement of talks can be so devastating to Obama\u2019s agenda: imposing new sanctions on Iran \u2013 whether they be congressional sanctions or executive orders \u2013 will only reduce the prospects for diplomacy by poisoning the atmosphere and further increasing mistrust between the two capitals, which in turn defeats America\u2019s ability to tap into its reservoir of leverage over Iran in the first place. The same is, of course, true for Iran: any effort by Tehran to intensify its efforts to undermine Washington\u2019s policies in the region as a means to gain leverage prior to negotiations will only render such talks less likely.<\/p>\n
To succeed with his pro-diplomacy agenda, Obama must not only avoid the fallacy that Washington doesn\u2019t have leverage over Iran and recognise the value of offering to lift existing sanctions in return for Iranian policy changes. He must also resist the temptation to undermine the path to negotiations by imposing new sanctions before talks have begun \u2013 including resisting pressure from domestic constituencies whose motivation for sanctions historically has precisely been to prevent a US-Iranian diplomatic breakthrough to begin with.<\/p>\n
The combination of incentives and disincentives that will succeed in advancing US interests vis-\u00e0-vis Iran is one in which diplomacy is at the centre and sanctions are in the periphery \u2013 not the other way around.<\/p>\n
Trita Parsi is the author of Treacherous Alliance \u2013 The Secret Dealings of Israel, Iran and the US<\/i> and a silver medal recipient of the Council on Foreign Relations\u2019 Arthur Ross Book Award. This article is distributed by the Common Ground News Service (CGNews) with permission from Bitterlemons<\/a>.<\/i><\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The definition of leverage in the Bush administration was one’s ability to get something for nothing. That approach has clearly failed; it does not characterise negotiations, but rather ultimatums and threats.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2895","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary"],"yoast_head":"\n
Foreign Policy: Why diplomacy and sanctions don’t mix<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The definition of leverage in the Bush administration was one's ability to get something for nothing. That approach has clearly failed; it does not characterise negotiations, but rather ultimatums and threats.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/altmuslim\/2008\/12\/why_diplomacy_and_sanctions_dont_mix\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Foreign Policy: Why diplomacy and sanctions don’t mix\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The definition of leverage in the Bush administration was one's ability to get something for nothing. That approach has clearly failed; it does not characterise negotiations, but rather ultimatums and threats.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/altmuslim\/2008\/12\/why_diplomacy_and_sanctions_dont_mix\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"altmuslim\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-12-18T00:25:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/www.altmuslim.com\/ee_images\/us-iran_flag.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Guest Contributor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Guest Contributor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/altmuslim\/2008\/12\/why_diplomacy_and_sanctions_dont_mix\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/altmuslim\/2008\/12\/why_diplomacy_and_sanctions_dont_mix\/\",\"name\":\"Foreign Policy: Why diplomacy and sanctions don’t mix\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/altmuslim\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-12-18T00:25:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2008-12-18T00:25:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/altmuslim\/#\/schema\/person\/2869b699bf0e57982cb1f212243705f2\"},\"description\":\"The definition of leverage in the Bush administration was one's ability to get something for nothing. That approach has clearly failed; it does not characterise negotiations, but rather ultimatums and threats.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/altmuslim\/2008\/12\/why_diplomacy_and_sanctions_dont_mix\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/altmuslim\/2008\/12\/why_diplomacy_and_sanctions_dont_mix\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/altmuslim\/2008\/12\/why_diplomacy_and_sanctions_dont_mix\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/altmuslim\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Foreign Policy: Why diplomacy and sanctions don’t mix\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/altmuslim\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/altmuslim\/\",\"name\":\"altmuslim\",\"description\":\"Global perspectives on Muslim life, politics & culture\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/altmuslim\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/altmuslim\/#\/schema\/person\/2869b699bf0e57982cb1f212243705f2\",\"name\":\"Guest Contributor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/altmuslim\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5010a3cc274cdb37811bf24de46dc280?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5010a3cc274cdb37811bf24de46dc280?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Guest Contributor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/altmuslim\/author\/admin\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Foreign Policy: Why diplomacy and sanctions don’t mix","description":"The definition of leverage in the Bush administration was one's ability to get something for nothing. That approach has clearly failed; it does not characterise negotiations, but rather ultimatums and threats.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/altmuslim\/2008\/12\/why_diplomacy_and_sanctions_dont_mix\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Foreign Policy: Why diplomacy and sanctions don’t mix","og_description":"The definition of leverage in the Bush administration was one's ability to get something for nothing. That approach has clearly failed; it does not characterise negotiations, but rather ultimatums and threats.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/altmuslim\/2008\/12\/why_diplomacy_and_sanctions_dont_mix\/","og_site_name":"altmuslim","article_published_time":"2008-12-18T00:25:00+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/www.altmuslim.com\/ee_images\/us-iran_flag.jpg"}],"author":"Guest Contributor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Guest Contributor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/altmuslim\/2008\/12\/why_diplomacy_and_sanctions_dont_mix\/","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/altmuslim\/2008\/12\/why_diplomacy_and_sanctions_dont_mix\/","name":"Foreign Policy: Why diplomacy and sanctions don’t mix","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/altmuslim\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-12-18T00:25:00+00:00","dateModified":"2008-12-18T00:25:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/altmuslim\/#\/schema\/person\/2869b699bf0e57982cb1f212243705f2"},"description":"The definition of leverage in the Bush administration was one's ability to get something for nothing. That approach has clearly failed; it does not characterise negotiations, but rather ultimatums and threats.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/altmuslim\/2008\/12\/why_diplomacy_and_sanctions_dont_mix\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/altmuslim\/2008\/12\/why_diplomacy_and_sanctions_dont_mix\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/altmuslim\/2008\/12\/why_diplomacy_and_sanctions_dont_mix\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/altmuslim\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Foreign Policy: Why diplomacy and sanctions don’t mix"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/altmuslim\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/altmuslim\/","name":"altmuslim","description":"Global perspectives on Muslim life, politics & culture","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/altmuslim\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/altmuslim\/#\/schema\/person\/2869b699bf0e57982cb1f212243705f2","name":"Guest Contributor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/altmuslim\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5010a3cc274cdb37811bf24de46dc280?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5010a3cc274cdb37811bf24de46dc280?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Guest Contributor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/altmuslim\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/altmuslim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2895","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/altmuslim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/altmuslim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/altmuslim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/altmuslim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2895"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/altmuslim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2895\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/altmuslim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2895"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/altmuslim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2895"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/altmuslim\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2895"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
![](\"https:\/\/www.altmuslim.com\/ee_images\/us-iran_flag.jpg\")
<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n